Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Notwithstanding G1161 it pleased G1380 Silas G4609 to abide G1961 there G847 still G1961.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Not present in the manuscripts this translation follows.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Not present in the manuscripts this translation follows.
Ask
American Standard Version
Not present in the manuscripts this translation follows.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Not present in the manuscripts this translation follows.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Notwithstanding Silas thought good to abide there still.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and it seemed good to Silas to remain there still.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
Acts 11:27-30, Acts 15:22-35, Acts 15:36-40
Acts 11:27-30, Acts 15:22-35, Acts 15:36-40 View full PDF
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1)
Paul's Second Missionary Journey (Part 1) View full PDF
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean)
All Acts Sites (Eastern Mediterranean) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 27,477 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Acts 15:34, though a textual variant present in the King James Version and some other manuscripts, offers a concise yet profoundly significant narrative detail: Silas's decision to remain in Antioch. This verse provides a crucial bridge between the Jerusalem Council's decree and the subsequent missionary endeavors, highlighting the personal choices of early Christian leaders that providentially shaped the nascent church's expansion and the formation of critical ministry partnerships.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is situated immediately after the momentous Jerusalem Council, detailed in Acts 15:1-29. The council had definitively addressed the contentious issue of Gentile salvation, affirming that circumcision and adherence to the Mosaic Law were not prerequisites. To officially communicate this decision, Paul and Barnabas were accompanied back to Antioch by Judas Barsabas and Silas, who were sent from Jerusalem to provide a personal, authoritative confirmation of the council's letter. Acts 15:33 states that Judas and Silas, having fulfilled their mission, were "let go in peace from the brethren unto the apostles." Acts 15:34, then, serves as an explanatory note, clarifying that while Judas returned, Silas chose to "abide there still," setting the stage for his continued involvement in the narrative, particularly his partnership with Paul.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The city of Antioch was a vital hub for early Christianity, serving as the launching pad for the first missionary journey and a significant center for Gentile believers. Its strategic location made it a melting pot of diverse cultures and a crucial point for the spread of the Gospel beyond Judea. The decision of the Jerusalem Council had immense implications for the cultural integration of Jewish and Gentile believers, requiring careful communication and leadership. Silas's presence in Antioch, a city where the church was thriving and facing new challenges, positioned him uniquely for future ministry. Travel in the ancient world was arduous and often required significant planning, making the decision to "abide there still" a deliberate and impactful one, likely involving considerations of lodging, community, and ongoing ministry needs.
  • Key Themes: Silas's choice to remain in Antioch contributes to several overarching themes within the book of Acts. Firstly, it underscores Divine Providence and Preparation, illustrating how God orchestrates seemingly personal decisions to fulfill His broader redemptive purposes. Silas's availability in Antioch directly facilitates his subsequent partnership with Paul on the second missionary journey, a critical phase in the expansion of the Gospel. Secondly, it highlights the Flexibility and Adaptability in Ministry characteristic of early Christian leaders. Silas's willingness to adjust his plans and remain where he felt called or useful demonstrates a spirit of selfless service essential for the rapid spread of the Gospel. Finally, for readers of the King James Version, this verse implicitly introduces the theme of Textual Nuance and Manuscript Tradition. While many modern translations omit this verse due to its absence in some older Greek manuscripts, its inclusion in the Textus Receptus (the Greek text underlying the KJV) draws attention to the historical process of biblical transmission and the various textual traditions that have shaped different versions of the Bible.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Notwithstanding (Greek, dé', G1161): This particle serves as a conjunction, often translated as "but," "and," or "moreover." In this context, it functions adversatively, indicating a contrast or a qualification to the preceding statement in Acts 15:33. While Judas returned, Silas's action was different, hence "notwithstanding" or "but." It signals a pivot in the narrative focus to Silas's individual decision.
  • pleased (Greek, dokéō', G1380): Derived from a verb meaning "to think" or "to seem," dokéō here conveys the idea of a personal decision, a choice that "seemed good" to Silas, or one that he "thought fit." It implies a volitional act on his part, suggesting personal inclination or divine leading that resonated with his own judgment, rather than a command or external compulsion.
  • to abide (Greek, epiménō', G1961): This compound verb, formed from epi (upon, in addition) and menō (to remain, to stay), means "to stay over" or "to continue in." It emphasizes the act of remaining in a place or persevering in a state. Here, it specifically denotes Silas's decision to prolong his stay in Antioch, indicating a settled intention to remain rather than to depart with Judas.

Verse Breakdown

  • "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas": This opening clause introduces a qualification to the previous verse, indicating a divergence in action between Judas and Silas. The phrase "it pleased Silas" highlights Silas's personal agency and volition in the matter. It was his decision, his preference, or what seemed good to him, possibly implying a sense of divine leading or a perceived need for his continued presence in Antioch.
  • "to abide there still": This phrase specifies Silas's chosen action: to remain in Antioch. The adverb "still" (implied by the repetition of the verb epiménō in the KJV's source text) emphasizes the continuation of his presence. This seemingly simple choice carries significant narrative weight, as it providentially positions Silas for his subsequent pivotal role alongside Paul in the second missionary journey.

Literary Devices

Acts 15:34, despite its brevity, employs several subtle literary devices. It functions as a Narrative Detail, providing specific information about the movements of a key character, Silas, which is crucial for understanding the subsequent unfolding of events in Acts. This detail also serves as a form of Foreshadowing, subtly hinting at Silas's future prominence. His decision to remain in Antioch, presented as a personal preference, providentially positions him to become Paul's new missionary partner in Acts 15:40, a significant turning point in the early church's outreach. Furthermore, for those aware of its textual history, the verse itself represents a Textual Variant, a feature that highlights the dynamic nature of biblical transmission and the meticulous work of textual criticism in establishing the most reliable ancient texts.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Acts 15:34, though a textual variant, carries profound theological implications regarding divine sovereignty and human agency in the unfolding of God's redemptive plan. Silas's personal decision to remain in Antioch, presented as something that "pleased" him, is not merely a random choice but is implicitly understood within the broader narrative of Acts as a step orchestrated by God. It demonstrates how God can use individual inclinations and seemingly small, personal choices to prepare His servants for greater assignments and to advance His kingdom. This highlights the beautiful synergy between God's overarching will and the responsive obedience of His people, where personal desires, when submitted to Him, can align perfectly with His providential leading, setting the stage for significant ministry.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The seemingly minor detail of Silas choosing to remain in Antioch offers a powerful lesson for believers today. It reminds us that God often works through the ordinary, personal decisions we make, guiding our steps in ways we may not immediately comprehend. Silas's willingness to be flexible and responsive to what "pleased" him, perhaps a divine prompting, positioned him for a pivotal role in the expansion of the Gospel. This encourages us to cultivate a spirit of availability and discernment, trusting that our personal inclinations, when surrendered to God, can align with His larger redemptive purposes. It challenges us to consider how our own "small" choices—where we live, whom we connect with, how we spend our time—might be part of God's preparation for future service or a strategic placement for His kingdom work. Our readiness to "abide" where God calls, even if it deviates from our initial plans, can lead to unforeseen opportunities for impact and partnership in His mission.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of your life might God be calling you to "abide still" or to adjust your plans, even if it seems like a small decision?
  • How can you cultivate a greater sensitivity to God's leading in your personal choices and inclinations?
  • Can you identify instances in your past where a seemingly minor decision led to significant spiritual growth or ministry opportunities?
  • What does Silas's example teach us about the importance of flexibility and availability in Christian service?

FAQ

Why is Acts 15:34 missing from many modern Bible translations?

Answer: Acts 15:34 is a well-known textual variant. It is included in the King James Version (KJV) because the KJV translators primarily relied on the Textus Receptus, a Greek New Testament text tradition that included this verse. However, many modern translations (like the ESV, NIV, NASB) are based on older and more numerous Greek manuscripts (such as the Alexandrian text-type) that do not contain this verse. Textual critics, weighing the evidence of manuscript age, geographical distribution, and textual consistency, generally conclude that the verse was likely a later scribal addition, possibly inserted to smooth the narrative transition between Acts 15:33 (where Judas and Silas are "let go") and Acts 15:40 (where Silas is with Paul). While its absence doesn't alter core theology, it highlights the ongoing work of biblical scholarship in establishing the most accurate text.

What happened to Silas after this verse?

Answer: Silas's decision to remain in Antioch, as noted in the KJV, proved to be providentially significant. Shortly after this, a sharp disagreement arose between Paul and Barnabas over John Mark, leading to their separation (Acts 15:36-39). Consequently, Paul chose Silas to accompany him on his second missionary journey, as recorded in Acts 15:40. Silas became a faithful and instrumental companion to Paul, enduring imprisonment with him in Philippi (Acts 16:19-40), helping to establish churches, and co-authoring several New Testament letters (e.g., 1 and 2 Thessalonians, 1 Peter, where he is called Silvanus).

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While Acts 15:34 focuses on Silas's personal decision, it beautifully illustrates a principle central to the Christ-centered life: the alignment of human will with divine purpose, mirroring the ultimate submission of Christ Himself. Just as Silas's "pleasure" to remain in Antioch providentially positioned him for crucial service alongside Paul, so too the entire ministry of the church is a continuation of Christ's mission, empowered by His Spirit. Jesus, the ultimate example of perfect obedience, consistently sought to do the Father's will, declaring, "I seek not my own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me" and "My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work". Silas's availability and willingness to be used, even in a seemingly small choice, reflects the call for all believers to be living sacrifices, ready to be deployed by the Head of the Church for His redemptive purposes. Our individual acts of obedience, guided by the Spirit, contribute to the larger narrative of God's plan to reconcile the world to Himself through Christ, ultimately building up the body of Christ and extending His kingdom until "the knowledge of the glory of the LORD shall cover the earth, as the waters cover the sea".

Copy as

Commentary on Acts 15 verses 22–35

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here the result of the consultation that was held at Jerusalem about the imposing of the ceremonial law upon the Gentiles. Much more, it is likely, was said about it than is here recorded; but at length it was brought to a head, and the advice which James gave was universally approved and agreed to nemine contradicente - unanimously; and letters were accordingly sent by messengers of their own to the Gentile converts, acquainting them with their sentiments in this matter, which would be a great confirmation to them against the false teachers. Now observe here,

I. The choice of the delegates that were to be sent with Paul and Barnabas on this errand; not as if they had any suspicion of the fidelity of these great men, and could not trust them with their letters, nor as if they thought that those to whom they sent them would suspect them to have altered any thing in their letter; no, their charity thought no such evil concerning men of such tried integrity; but,

1.They thought fit to send men of their own company to Antioch, with Paul and Barnabas, Act 15:22. This was agreed to by the apostles and elders, with the whole church, who, it is likely, undertook to bear their charges, Co1 9:7. They sent these messengers, (1.) To show their respect to the church at Antioch, as a sister-church, though a younger sister, and that they looked upon it as upon the same level with them; as also that they were desirous further to know their state. (2.) To encourage Paul and Barnabas, and to make their journey home the more pleasant (for it is likely they travelled on foot) by sending such excellent men to bear them company; amicus pro vehiculo - a friend instead of a carriage. (3.) To put a reputation upon the letters they carried, that it might appear a solemn embassy, and so much the more regard might be paid to the message, which was likely to meet with opposition from some. (4.) To keep up the communion of the saints, and cultivate an acquaintance between churches and ministers that were at a distance from each other, and to show that, though they were many, yet they were one.

2.Those they sent were not inferior persons, who might serve to carry the letters, and attest the receipt of them from the apostles; but they were chosen men, and chief men among the brethren, men of eminent gifts, graces, and usefulness; for these are the things which denominate men chief among the brethren, and qualify them to be the messengers of the churches. They are here named: Judas, who was called Barsabas (probably the brother of that Joseph who was called Barsabas, that was a candidate for the apostleship, Act 1:23), and Silas. The character which these men had in the church at Jerusalem would have some influence upon those that came from Judea, as those false teachers did, and engage them to pay the more deference to the message that was sent by them.

II. The drawing up of the letters, circular letters, that were to be sent to the churches, to notify the sense of the synod in this matter.

1.Here is a very condescending obliging preamble to this decree, Act 15:23. There is nothing in it haughty or assuming, but, (1.) That which intimates the humility of the apostles, that they join the elders and brethren in commission with them, the ministers, the ordinary Christians, whom they had advised with in this case, as they used to do in other cases. Though never men were so qualified as they were for a monarchical power and authority in the church, nor had such a commission as they had, yet their decrees run not, "We, the apostles, Christ's vicars upon earth, and pastors of all the pastors of the churches" (as the pope styles himself), "and sole judges in all matters of faith;" but the apostles, and elders, and brethren, agree in their orders. Herein they remembered the instructions their Master gave them (Mat 23:8): Be not you called Rabbi; for you are all brethren. (2.) That which bespeaks their respect to the churches they wrote to; they send to them greeting, wish them health and happiness and joy, and call them brethren of the Gentiles, thereby owning their admission into the church, and giving them the right hand of fellowship: "You are our brethren, though Gentiles; for we meet in Christ, the first born among many brethren, in God our common Father." Now that the Gentiles are fellow-heirs and of the same body, they are to be countenanced and encouraged, and called brethren.

2.Here is a just and severe rebuke to the judaizing teachers (Act 15:24): "We have heard that certain who went out from us have troubled you with words, and we are very much concerned to hear it; now this is to let them know that those who preached this doctrine were false teachers, both as they produced a false commission and as they taught a false doctrine." (1.) They did a great deal of wrong to the apostles and ministers at Jerusalem, in pretending that they had instructions from them to impose the ceremonial law upon the Gentiles, when there was no colour for such a pretension. "They went out from us indeed - they were such as belonged to our church, of which, when they had a mind to travel, we gave them perhaps a testimonial; but, as for their urging the law of Moses upon you, we gave them no such commandment, nor had we ever thought of such a thing, nor given them the least occasion to use our names in it." It is no new thing for apostolical authority to be pleaded in defence of those doctrines and practices for which yet the apostles gave neither command nor encouragement. (2.) They did a great deal of wrong to the Gentile converts, in saying, You must be circumcised, and must keep the law. [1.] It perplexed them: "They have troubled you with words, have occasioned disturbance and disquietment to you. You depended upon those who told you, If you believe in the Lord Jesus Christ you shall be saved; and now you are startled by those that tell you you must keep the law of Moses or you cannot be saved, by which you see yourselves drawn into a snare. They trouble you with words - words, and nothing else - mere words - sound, but no substance." How has the church been troubled with words, by the pride of men that loved to hear themselves talk! [2.] It endangered them; they subverted their souls, put them into disorder, and pulled down that which had been built up. They took them off from pursuing pure Christianity, and minding the business of that, by filling their heads with the necessity of circumcision, and the law of Moses, which were nothing to the purpose.

3.Here is an honourable testimony given of the messengers by whom these letters were sent.

(1.)Of Paul and Barnabas, whom these judaizing teachers had opposed and censured as having done their work by the halves, because they had brought the Gentile converts to Christianity only, and not to Judaism. Let them say what they will of these men, [1.] "They are men that are dear to us; they are our beloved Barnabas and Paul - men whom we have a value for, a kindness for, a concern for." Sometimes it is good for those that are of eminence to express their esteem, not only for the despised truth of Christ, but for the despised preachers and defenders of that truth, to encourage them, and weaken the hands of their opposers. [2.] "They are men that have signalized themselves in the service of Christ, and therefore have deserved well of all the churches: they are men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ (Act 15:26), and therefore are worthy of double honour, and cannot be suspected of having sought any secular advantage to themselves; for they have ventured their all for Christ, have engaged in the most dangerous services, as good soldiers of Christ, and not only in laborious services." It is not likely that such faithful confessors should be unfaithful preachers. Those that urged circumcision did it to avoid persecution (Gal 6:12, Gal 6:13); those that opposed it knew they thereby exposed themselves to persecution; and which of these were most likely to be in the right?

(2.)Of Judas and Silas: "They are chosen men (Act 15:25), and they are men that have heard our debates, and are perfectly apprized of the matter, and will tell you the same things by mouth," Act 15:27. What is of use to us it is good to have both in writing and by word of mouth, that we may have the advantage both of reading and of hearing it. The apostles refer them to the bearers for a further account of their judgment and their reasons, and the bearers will refer them to their letters for the certainty of the determination.

4.Here is the direction given what to require from the Gentile converts, where observe,

(1.)The matter of the injunction, which is according to the advice given by James, that, to avoid giving offence to the Jews, [1.] They should never eat any thing that they knew had been offered in sacrifice to an idol, but look upon it as, though clean in itself, yet thereby polluted to them. This prohibition was afterwards in part taken off, for they were allowed to eat whatever was sold in the shambles, or set before them at their friend's table, though it had been offered to idols, except when there was danger of giving offence by it, that is, of giving occasion either to a weak Christian to think the worse of our Christianity, or to a wicked heathen to think the better of his idolatry; and in these cases it is good to forbear, Co1 10:25, etc. This to us is an antiquated case. [2.] That they should not eat blood, nor drink it; but avoid every thing that looked cruel and barbarous in that ceremony which had been of so long standing. [3.] That they should not eat any thing that was strangled, or died of itself, or had not the blood let out. [4.] That they should be very strict in censuring those that were guilty of fornication, or marrying within the degrees prohibited by the Levitical law, which, some think, is principally intended here. See Co1 5:1. Dr. Hammond states this matter thus: The judaizing teachers would have the Gentile converts submit to all that those submitted to whom they called the proselytes of righteousness, to be circumcised and keep the whole law; but the apostles required no more of them than what was required of the proselytes of the gate, which was to observe the seven precepts of the sons of Noah, which, he thinks, are here referred to. But the only ground of this decree being in complaisance to the rigid Jews that had embraced the Christian faith, and, except in that one case of scandal, all meats being pronounced free and indifferent to all Christians as soon as the reason of the decree ceased, which, at furthest, was after the destruction of Jerusalem, the obligation of it ceased likewise. "These things are in a particular manner offensive to the Jews, and therefore do not disoblige them herein for the present; in a little time the Jews will incorporate with the Gentiles, and then the danger is over."

(2.)The manner in which it is worded. [1.] They express themselves with something of authority, that what they wrote might be received with respect, and deference paid to it: It seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, that is, to us under the guidance of the Holy Ghost, and by direction from him: not only the apostles, but others, were endued with spiritual gifts extraordinary, and knew more of the mind of God than any since those gifts ceased can pretend to; their infallibility gave an incontestable authority to their decrees, and they would not order any thing because it seemed good to them, but that they knew it first seemed good to the Holy Ghost. Or it refers to what the Holy Ghost had determined in this matter formerly. When the Holy Ghost descended upon the apostles, he endued them with the gift of tongues, in order to their preaching the gospel to the Gentiles, which was a plain indication of God's purpose to call them in. When the Holy Ghost descended upon Cornelius and his friends, upon Peter's preaching, it was plain that Christ designed the taking down of the Jewish pale, within which they fancied the spirit had been enclosed. [2.] They express themselves with abundance of tenderness and fatherly concern. First, They are afraid of burdening them: We will lay upon you no greater burden. So far were they from delighting to impose upon them that they dreaded nothing so much as imposing too far upon them, so as to discourage them at their setting out. Secondly, They impose upon them no other than necessary things. "The avoiding of fornication is necessary to all Christians at all times; the avoiding of things strangled, and of blood, and of things offered to idols, is necessary at this time, for the keeping up of a good understanding between you and the Jews, and the preventing of offence;" and as long as it continues necessary for that end, and no longer, it is enjoined. Note, Church-rulers should impose only necessary things, things which Christ has made our duty, which have a real tendency to the edification of the church, and, as here, to the uniting of good Christians. If they impose things only to show their own authority, and to try people's obedience, they forget that they have not authority to make new laws, but only to see that the laws of Christ be duly executed, and to enforce the observance of them. Thirdly, They enforce their order with a commendation of those that shall comply with it, rather than with the condemnation of those that shall transgress it. They do not conclude, "From which if you do not keep yourselves, you shall be an anathema, you shall be cast out of the church, and accursed," according to the style of after-councils, and particularly that of Trent; but "From which if you keep yourselves, as we do not question but you will, you will do well; it will be for the glory of God, the furtherance of the gospel, the strengthening of the hands of your brethren, and your own credit and comfort." It is all sweetness and love and good humour, such as became the followers of him who, when he called us to take his yoke upon us, assured us we should find him meek and lowly in heart. The difference of the style of the true apostles from that of the false is very observable. Those that were for imposing the ceremonial laws were positive and imperious: Except you keep it, you cannot be saved (Act 15:1), you are excommunicated ipso facto - at once, and delivered to Satan. The apostles of Christ, who only recommend necessary things, are mild and gentle: "From which if you keep yourselves, you will do well, and as becomes you. Fare ye well; we are hearty well-wishers to your honour and peace."

III. The delivering of the letters, and how the messengers disposed of themselves.

1.When they were dismissed, had had their audience of leave of the apostles (it is probable that they were dismissed with prayer, and a solemn blessing in the name of the Lord, and with instructions and encouragements in their work), They then came to Antioch; they staid no longer at Jerusalem than till their business was done, and then came back, and perhaps were met at their return by those that brought them on their way at their setting out; for those that have taken pains in public service ought to be countenanced and encouraged.

2.As soon as they came to Antioch, they gathered the multitude together, and delivered the epistle to them (Act 15:30, Act 15:31), that they might all know what it was that was forbidden them, and might observe these orders, which would be no difficulty for them to do, most of them having been, before their conversion to Christ, proselytes of the gate, who had laid themselves under these restrictions already. But this was not all; it was that they might know that no more than this was forbidden them, that it was no longer a sin to eat swine's flesh, no longer a pollution to touch a grave or a dead body.

3.The people were wonderfully pleased with the orders that came from Jerusalem (Act 15:31): They rejoiced for the consolation; and a great consolation it was to the multitude, (1.) That they were confirmed in their freedom from the yoke of the ceremonial law, and were not burdened with that, as those upstart teachers would have had them to be. It was a comfort to them to hear that the carnal ordinances were no longer imposed on them, which perplexed the conscience, but could not purify nor pacify it. (2.) That those who troubled their minds with an attempt to force circumcision upon them were hereby for the present silenced and put to confusion, the fraud of their pretensions to an apostolical warrant being now discovered. (3.) That the Gentiles were hereby encouraged to receive the gospel, and those that had received it to adhere to it. (4.) That the peace of the church was hereby restored, and that removed which threatened a division. All this was consolation which they rejoiced in, and blessed God for.

4.They got the strange ministers that came from Jerusalem to give them each a sermon, and more, Act 15:32. Judas and Silas, being prophets also themselves, endued with the Holy Ghost, and called to the work, and being likewise entrusted by the apostles to deliver some things relating to this matter by word of mouth, exhorted the brethren with many words, and confirmed them. Even those that had the constant preaching of Paul and Barnabas, yet were glad of the help of Judas and Silas; the diversity of the gifts of ministers is of use to the church. Observe what is the work of ministers with those that are in Christ. (1.) To confirm them, by bringing them to see more reason both for their faith in Christ and their obedience to him; to confirm their choice of Christ and their resolutions for Christ. (2.) To exhort them to perseverance, and to the particular duties required of them: to quicken them to that which is good, and direct them in it. They comforted the brethren (so it may be rendered), and this would contribute to the confirming of them; for the joy of the Lord will be our strength. They exhorted them with many words; they used a very great copiousness and variety of expression. One word would affect one, and another another; and therefore, though what they had to say might have been summed up in a few words, yet it was for the edification of the church that they used many words, dia logou pollou - with much speech, much reasoning; precept must be upon precept.

5.The dismission of the Jerusalem ministers, Act 15:33. When they had spent some time among them (so it might be read), poiēsantes chronon - having made some stay, and having made it to good purpose, not having trifled away time, but having filled it up, they were let go in peace from the brethren at Antioch, to the apostles at Jerusalem, with all possible expressions of kindness and respect; they thanked them for their coming and pains, and the good service they had done, wished them their health and a good journey home, and committed them to the custody of the peace of God.

6.The continuance of Silas, notwithstanding, together with Paul and Barnabas, at Antioch. (1.) Silas, when it came to the setting to, would not go back with Judas to Jerusalem, but let him go home by himself, and chose rather to abide still at Antioch, Act 15:34. And we have no reason at all to blame him for it, though we know not the reason that moved him to it. I am apt to think the congregations at Antioch were both more large and more lively than those at Jerusalem, and that this tempted him to stay there, and he did well: so did Judas, who, notwithstanding this, returned to his post of service at Jerusalem. (2.) Paul and Barnabas, though their work lay chiefly among the Gentiles, yet continued for some time in Antioch, being pleased with the society of the ministers and people there, which, it should seem by divers passages, was more than ordinarily inviting. They continued there, not to take their pleasure, but teaching and preaching the word of God. Antioch, being the chief city of Syria, it is probable there was a great resort of Gentiles thither from all parts upon one account or other, as there was of Jews to Jerusalem; so that in preaching there they did in effect preach to many nations, for they preached to those who would carry the report of what they preached to many nations, and thereby prepare them for the apostles' coming in person to preach to them. And thus they were not only not idle at Antioch, but were serving their main intention. (3.) There were many others also there, labouring at the same oar. The multitude of workmen in Christ's vineyard does not give us a writ of ease. Even where there are many others labouring in the word and doctrine, yet there may be opportunity for us; the zeal and usefulness of others should excite us, not lay us asleep.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 22–35. Public domain.
Copy as
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Acts 15:34 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.