Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And when he came, behold, the captains of the host were sitting; and he said, I have an errand to thee, O captain. And Jehu said, Unto which of all us? And he said, To thee, O captain.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And when he came H935, behold, the captains H8269 of the host H2428 were sitting H3427; and he said H559, I have an errand H1697 to thee, O captain H8269. And Jehu H3058 said H559, Unto which of all us? And he said H559, To thee, O captain H8269.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
When he arrived, he found the senior army officers sitting there. He said, "I have a message for you, commander." Yehu asked, "For which one of us?" "For you, commander," he said.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
and when he arrived, the army commanders were sitting there. “I have a message for you, commander,” he said. “For which of us?” asked Jehu. “For you, commander,” he replied.
Ask
American Standard Version
And when he came, behold, the captains of the host were sitting; and he said, I have an errand to thee, O captain. And Jehu said, Unto which of us all? And he said, To thee, O captain.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
When he came, behold, the captains of the army were sitting. Then he said, “I have a message for you, captain.” Jehu said, “To which of us all?” He said, “To you, O captain.”
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And when he came in, behold, the captaines of the armie were sitting. And he sayde, I haue a message to thee, O captaine. And Iehu sayd, Vnto which of all vs? And he answered, To thee, O captaine.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and cometh in, and lo, chiefs of the force are sitting, and he saith, `I have a word unto thee, O chief!' and Jehu saith, `Unto which of all of us?' and he saith, `Unto thee, O chief.'
Ask
See also
See on the biblical-era map
The Coup of Jehu (Part 3)
The Coup of Jehu (Part 3) View full PDF
The Coup of Jehu (Part 1)
The Coup of Jehu (Part 1) View full PDF
The Coup of Jehu (Part 2)
The Coup of Jehu (Part 2) View full PDF

Map © Biblica Open Bible Maps · CC BY-SA 4.0

In the KJVVerse 9,762 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Second Kings 9:5 marks a pivotal moment in Israelite history, capturing the dramatic arrival of a young prophet, dispatched by Elisha, who directly confronts Jehu, a prominent military captain, amidst his peers at Ramoth-Gilead. The prophet's urgent and singular declaration, "I have an errand to thee, O captain," immediately disrupts the military assembly, establishing a tone of divine purpose and mystery. Jehu's natural query, "Unto which of all us?" is met with an unwavering reaffirmation, "To thee, O captain," powerfully underscoring the highly specific and personal nature of the divine commission about to be unveiled, which will initiate a violent purge of the idolatrous Omride dynasty.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse serves as the immediate and dramatic initiation of the divine judgment against the house of Ahab, as prophesied by Elijah and Elisha. It directly follows Elisha's precise instructions to one of the "sons of the prophets" to go to Ramoth-Gilead, find Jehu, anoint him king, and then immediately flee (2 Kings 9:1-3). The prophet's arrival in 2 Kings 9:5, therefore, is the direct fulfillment of this urgent divine mandate, setting in motion the rapid and violent events that dominate the remainder of the chapter. The scene is deliberately set within a military encampment, highlighting the ongoing conflict with Aram (Syria) and emphasizing that God's intervention is not merely spiritual but also deeply intertwined with the political and military leadership of Israel. The prophet's abrupt intrusion into a meeting of high-ranking officers, and his specific address to Jehu amidst others, builds immediate suspense and signals the extraordinary, divinely orchestrated nature of the impending message that will shatter the status quo.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: Ramoth-Gilead was a strategically crucial fortress located on the eastern frontier of Israel, a site frequently contested and fought over by Israel and its Aramean (Syrian) adversaries. At this particular juncture, King Joram of Israel (son of Ahab) was recuperating in Jezreel from wounds sustained during a recent battle against the Arameans at Ramoth-Gilead, leaving the military command in the hands of his captains, including Jehu. The Omride dynasty, established by Omri and continued through Ahab, Jezebel, and Joram, was infamous for its aggressive promotion of Baal worship and other idolatrous practices, which had drawn severe condemnation from prophets like Elijah and Elisha. Divine judgment against the house of Ahab for their apostasy had been prophesied long ago, notably in 1 Kings 21:21-24. The anointing of a new king by a prophet, while a legitimate means of divine intervention in Israelite monarchy, was often a disruptive act, signifying God's sovereign choice and frequently His judgment against a reigning, unfaithful house. The prophet's youth and directness in addressing seasoned military leaders would have been particularly striking and impactful within this context.
  • Key Themes: The events of 2 Kings 9:5 are foundational to several profound theological and narrative themes within the book of Kings. First, it powerfully illustrates Divine Sovereignty and Specificity, demonstrating God's precise control over human affairs and His ability to single out individuals for particular tasks, even amidst a crowd of potential candidates. Jehu's individual calling, emphasized by the prophet's repeated "To thee, O captain," highlights this divine particularity and the intentionality of God's choices. Second, the scene underscores the paramount Authority of the Prophetic Word. Despite the prophet being unnamed and seemingly young, his message carries the full weight of God's command, demanding immediate attention and action from powerful military leaders. This demonstrates that God's word transcends human protocols, hierarchies, and expectations, asserting its inherent power and ultimate efficacy, as seen throughout the prophetic narratives in 1 Kings and 2 Kings. Third, this verse serves as the immediate precursor to the execution of Divine Judgment against Idolatry. The anointing of Jehu is the divinely appointed means to fulfill long-standing prophecies of judgment against the wicked house of Ahab, particularly their egregious promotion of Baal worship, a theme prevalent from 1 Kings 16 through 2 Kings 9. The "errand" is not merely a message but a divine mandate for a violent, cleansing purge.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Errand (Hebrew, dâbâr', H1697): From the root H1697, this word is far more encompassing than a simple message. It signifies "a word," "a matter," "a thing," or "a business." In this context, it denotes an urgent, divinely authorized, and purposeful task or commission. The prophet is not merely delivering news but is an agent of a significant, pre-ordained divine action. The use of this word immediately signals the gravity and importance of the prophet's presence and the profound nature of the communication he brings.
  • Captain (Hebrew, sar', H8269): This term broadly means "prince," "chief," "commander," or "leader." Here, it specifically refers to a military commander, highlighting Jehu's position of authority within the army. The prophet's repeated use of "O captain" to address Jehu, both initially and in response to Jehu's question, emphasizes that the divine message is directed to his person and his office, setting him apart from the other leaders present and underscoring his suitability for the military task ahead.
  • Jehu (Hebrew, Yêhûwʼ', H3058): Meaning "Jehovah (is) He." This name itself carries theological significance, hinting at the divine agency at play. The prophet's specific call to Jehu, by name, highlights the personal and intentional nature of God's choice. Jehu, whose name proclaims God's active presence and identity, is now being called to be the instrument through whom God will demonstrate His sovereignty and execute His will against a rebellious dynasty.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And when he came, behold, the captains of the host [were] sitting": This opening clause meticulously sets the scene. The prophet arrives at Ramoth-Gilead, a strategic military outpost, and finds the high-ranking officers of the Israelite army gathered, likely engaged in a strategic meeting or resting. The interjection "behold" (Hebrew hinneh) serves to immediately draw the reader's attention to the suddenness of the prophet's appearance and the established, perhaps routine, military setting that he is about to dramatically disrupt.
  • "and he said, I have an errand to thee, O captain.": The prophet's direct and unhesitating address is profoundly striking. He bypasses all military protocol and social niceties, not greeting the entire group or seeking permission, but immediately singling out Jehu with a declaration of a specific "errand" or mission. This directness establishes the urgency, the divine authority, and the intensely personal nature of the message, cutting through any collective identity and isolating Jehu for what is to come.
  • "And Jehu said, Unto which of all us?": Jehu's response is a natural, human reaction of surprise, curiosity, and perhaps a touch of apprehension. Surrounded by other high-ranking "captains" of similar status, he seeks clarification. His question reflects the shared rank among the officers and perhaps a premonition that such a direct, private summons from a prophetic figure often portended significant, life-altering news, whether for good or ill. It also masterfully builds suspense for both the characters and the reader.
  • "And he said, To thee, O captain.": The prophet's unwavering and resolute repetition of the specific address removes all ambiguity and firmly establishes the divine specificity of the call. This firm affirmation confirms that Jehu, and no one else among the assembled officers, is the intended recipient of this momentous "errand." It sets him apart for the unique, dangerous, and divinely mandated task God has prepared for him, leaving no room for misunderstanding or evasion.

Literary Devices

The verse effectively employs several literary devices to heighten its dramatic impact and underscore its theological significance. Foreshadowing is prominently featured, as the prophet's specific and urgent summons of Jehu unmistakably hints at the momentous and violent events about to unfold – Jehu's anointing as king and the subsequent brutal purge of the Omride dynasty. There is a strong element of Dramatic Irony, as the other captains are present but remain completely oblivious to the earth-shattering divine commission about to be delivered to their colleague, while the reader is fully aware of the prophet's ultimate purpose from Elisha's preceding instructions (2 Kings 9:1-3). The scene also masterfully builds Tension and Suspense through the prophet's abrupt arrival, his mysterious declaration of an "errand," and Jehu's questioning response, all culminating in the prophet's resolute confirmation of Jehu as the sole recipient. Finally, the potent use of Direct Address ("to thee, O captain") repeatedly emphasizes the personal, undeniable, and divinely ordained nature of the call, cutting through any collective identity and isolating Jehu for his unique and formidable destiny.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

2 Kings 9:5 powerfully illustrates God's sovereign hand actively at work in human history, demonstrating His ability to raise up and specifically commission individuals to fulfill His divine purposes, often in unexpected ways and at critical junctures. The prophet's single-minded focus on Jehu, amidst a group of equally qualified captains, underscores that God's calls are not random but deeply personal and precisely targeted for the specific task at hand. This verse sets the stage for a dramatic display of God's justice, as Jehu is about to become the divinely appointed instrument of judgment against the deeply entrenched idolatry and wickedness of the Omride dynasty. It serves as a potent reminder that God's word, delivered through His chosen messengers, carries intrinsic authority and will always find its intended recipient and accomplish its ultimate purpose, regardless of human resistance or circumstance.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

The scene in 2 Kings 9:5 challenges believers today to consider our own responsiveness to God's call and direction in our lives. Just as Jehu was singled out from a group of peers, God often has specific assignments and unique purposes for individuals within His larger redemptive plan. This verse invites us to cultivate a profound attentiveness to God's voice, even when it comes through unexpected channels, disrupts our established routines, or seems to pull us away from our comfortable surroundings. Are we willing to be pulled aside, to listen intently, and to respond with obedience when God has an "errand" for us? The prophet's unwavering focus on Jehu reminds us that divine calls are often clear, persistent, and require our willingness to set aside distractions and embrace the specific task God has uniquely prepared for us. Furthermore, it highlights the immense weight and seriousness of a divine commission, urging us to approach our unique roles in God's kingdom with a sense of purpose, humility, and unwavering obedience, recognizing that even seemingly small acts of faithfulness can be integral to God's grand, unfolding plan for justice, righteousness, and redemption in the world.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what ways might God be seeking to "pull you aside" for a specific "errand" or task in your life today?
  • How willing are you to be disrupted from your routine or comfortable setting by a clear divine call or prompting?
  • What might it mean to respond with Jehu's initial curiosity, but then with decisive obedience, to a clear divine directive?
  • How does the specificity of God's call to Jehu encourage or challenge your understanding of your own unique purpose and calling within God's kingdom?

FAQ

Why did the prophet need to single out Jehu so explicitly, even after Jehu asked "Unto which of all us?"

Answer: The prophet's explicit and repeated singling out of Jehu served several crucial purposes, emphasizing the unique nature of the divine commission. First, it established the undeniable divine authority behind the message. This was not a general announcement but a highly personal and specific command from God, leaving no room for doubt about its intended recipient. Second, it created immediate intrigue and separation, pulling Jehu away from his peers and setting him apart for a unique, private encounter. This privacy was essential for the anointing that immediately followed, which was a sacred act not meant for public display at that precise moment (as seen in 2 Kings 9:6). Third, Jehu's question, "Unto which of all us?" was a natural human reaction to such an unexpected and direct address in a public setting. The prophet's firm repetition, "To thee, O captain," removed all ambiguity, ensuring Jehu fully understood that he, and no one else, was the intended recipient of this momentous divine "errand." This clarity was vital for Jehu to grasp the immense weight of the coming revelation and the subsequent actions he was divinely mandated to undertake.

What was the significance of Ramoth-Gilead as the setting for this event?

Answer: Ramoth-Gilead was a highly significant and strategic location, making it a fitting backdrop for Jehu's anointing and the initiation of a military coup. Historically, it was a contested city on the eastern frontier of Israel, frequently fought over by Israel and Aram (Syria), symbolizing the ongoing struggle for national security and sovereignty. At this time, King Joram of Israel had been wounded in battle there (as detailed in 2 Kings 8:28-29), indicating it was a place of ongoing conflict and military tension. By anointing Jehu in a military camp at Ramoth-Gilead, God powerfully underscored that the coming judgment on the Omride dynasty would be executed through a military leader and would involve decisive, forceful action. It emphasized that God was intervening directly in the political and military affairs of the nation, using the very context of war to bring about His purposes of judgment and the establishment of a new, more righteous dynasty. The location thus highlights the practical, real-world, and often violent nature of God's sovereign intervention in human history.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 2 Kings 9:5 details a specific, violent commission for judgment in Old Testament Israel, it finds profound Christ-centered fulfillment in the ultimate "errand" of God's Son. Just as Jehu was singled out from a group for a unique mission, Jesus Christ was uniquely chosen and sent by the Father for the supreme divine mission: to redeem humanity and establish God's eternal kingdom. The prophet's direct and unwavering address, "To thee, O captain," echoes the Father's specific commissioning of Jesus, who Himself declared, "For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me" (John 6:38). Jesus is the ultimate "Captain" or "Author" of our salvation (Hebrews 2:10), sent not to execute temporal judgment through violence, but to execute God's righteous judgment against sin through His own self-sacrificial love and to establish a new covenant. Unlike Jehu, whose mission was one of earthly destruction and temporary kingship, Christ's "errand" was one of perfect obedience, culminating in His atoning death and glorious resurrection, bringing about eternal salvation. He is the ultimate Prophet, Priest, and King, fulfilling all the shadows and types of Old Testament figures, including those chosen for specific divine tasks. His coming was the ultimate divine disruption, not of a military council, but of the powers of sin and death, bringing about a spiritual purge and establishing a reign that is eternal, righteous, and universally encompassing (Revelation 19:11-16).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 9 verses 1–10

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

We have here the anointing of Jehu to be king, who was, at this time, a commander (probably commander-in-chief) of the forces employed at Ramoth-Gilead, Kg2 9:14. There he was fighting for the king his master, but received orders from a higher king to fight against him. It does not appear that Jehu aimed at the government, or that he ever thought of it, but the commission given him was a perfect surprise to him. Some think that he had been anointed before by Elijah, whom God ordered to do it, but privately, and with an intimation that he must not act till further orders, as Samuel anointed David long before he was to come to the throne: but that it not at all probable, for then we must suppose Elijah had anointed Hazael too. No, when God bade him do these things he bade him anoint Elisha to be prophet in his room, to do them when he was gone, as God should direct him. Here is,

I. The commission sent.

1.Elisha did not go himself to anoint Jehu, because he was old and unfit for such a journey and so well known that he could not do it privately, could not go and come without observation; therefore he sends one of the sons of the prophets to do it, Kg2 9:1. They not only reverences him as their father (Kg2 2:15), but observed and obeyed him as their father. This service of anointing Jehu, (1.) Had danger in it (Sa1 16:2), and therefore it was not fit that Elisha should expose himself, but one of the sons of the prophets, whose life was of less value, and who could do it with less danger. (2.) It required labour and was therefore fitter for a young man in his full strength. Let youth work and age direct. (3.) Yet it was an honourable piece of service, to anoint a king, and he that did it might hope to be preferred for it afterwards, and therefore, for the encouragement of the young prophets, Elisha employed one of them: he would not engross all the honours to himself, nor grudge the young prophets a share in them.

2.When he sent him, (1.) He put the oil into his hand with which he must anoint Jehu: Take this box of oil Solomon was anointed with oil out of the tabernacle, Kg1 1:39. That could not now be had, but oil from a prophet's hand was equivalent to oil out of God's house. Probably it was not the constant practice to anoint kings, but upon the disturbance of the succession, as in the case of Solomon, or the interruption of it, as in the case of Joash (Kg1 11:12), or the translation of the government to a new family, as here and in the case of David; yet it might be used generally, though the scripture does not mention it. (2.) He put the words into his mouth which he must say (Kg2 9:3) - I have anointed thee king, and, no doubt, told him all the rest that he said, Kg2 9:7-10. Those whom God sends on his errands shall not go without full instructions. (3.) He also ordered him, [1.] To do it privately, to single out Jehu from the rest of the captains and anoint him in an inner chamber (Kg2 9:2), that Jehu's confidence in his commission might be tried, when he had no witness to attest it. His being suddenly animated for the service would be proof sufficient of his being anointed to it. There needed no other proof. The thing signified was the best evidence of the sign. [2.] To do it expeditiously. When he went about it he must gird up his loins; when he had done it he must flee and not tarry for a fee, or a treat, or to see what Jehu would do. It becomes the sons of the prophets to be quick and lively at their work, to go about it and go through it as men that hate sauntering and trifling. They should be as angels that fly swiftly.

II. The commission delivered. The young prophet did his business with despatch, was at Ramoth-Gilead presently, Kg2 9:4. There he found the general officers sitting together, either at dinner or in a council of war, Kg2 9:5. With the assurance that became a messenger from God, notwithstanding the meanness of his appearance, he called Jehu out from the rest, not waiting his leisure, or begging his pardon for disturbing him, but as one having authority: I have an errand to thee, O captain. Perhaps Jehu had some intimation of his business; and therefore, that he might not seem too forward to catch at the honour, he asked, To which of all us? that it might not be said afterwards he got it by speaking first, but they might all be satisfied he was indeed the person designed. When the prophet had him alone he anointed him, Kg2 9:6. The anointing of the Spirit is a hidden thing, that new name which none knows but those that have it. Herewith,

1.He invests him with the royal dignity: Thus saith the Lord God of Israel, whose messenger I am, in his name I have anointed thee king over the people of the Lord. He gives him an incontestable title, but reminds him that he was made king, (1.) By the God of Israel; from him he must see his power derived (for by him kings reign), for he must use it, and to him he must be accountable. Magistrates are the ministers of God, and must therefore act in dependence upon him and with an entire devotedness to him and to his glory. (2.) Over the Israel of God. Though the people of Israel were wretchedly corrupted, and had forfeited all the honour of relationship to God, yet they are here called the people of the Lord, for he had a right to them and had not yet given them a bill of divorce. Jehu must look upon the people he was made king of as the people of the Lord, not as his vassals, but God's freemen, his sons, his first-born, not to be abused or tyrannized over, God's people, and therefore to be ruled for him, and according to his laws.

2.He instructs him in his present service, which was to destroy all the house of Ahab (Kg2 9:7), not that he might clear his own way to the throne, and secure to himself the possession of it, but that he might execute the judgments of God upon that guilty and obnoxious family. He calls Ahab his master, that the relation might be no objection. "He was thy master, and to lift up thy hand against his son and successor would be not only base ingratitude, but treason, rebellion, and all that is bad, if thou hadst not an immediate command from God to do it. But thou art under higher obligations to thy Master in heaven than to thy master Ahab. He has determined that the whole house of Ahab shall perish, and by thy hand; fear not: has not he commanded thee? Fear not sin; his command will justify thee and bear thee out: fear not danger; his command will secure and prosper thee." That he might intelligently, and in a right manner, do this great execution on the house of Ahab, he tells him, (1.) What was their crime, what the ground of the controversy, and wherefore God had quarrel with them, that he might have an eye to that which God had an eye to, and that was the blood of God's servants, the prophets and others, faithful worshippers, which they had shed, and which must now be required at the hand of Jezebel. That they were idolaters was bad enough, and merited all that was brought upon them; yet that is not mentioned here, but the controversy God has with them is for their being persecutors, not so much their throwing down God's altars as their slaying his prophets with the sword. Nothing fills the measure of the iniquity of any prince or people as this does nor brings a surer or a sorer ruin. This was the sin that brought on Jerusalem its first destruction (Ch2 36:16) and its final one, Mat 23:37, Mat 23:38. Jezebel's whoredoms and witchcrafts were not so provoking as her persecuting the prophets, killing some and driving the rest into corners and caves, Kg1 18:4. (2.) What was their doom. They were sentenced to utter destruction; not to be corrected, but to be cut off and rooted out. This Jehu must know, that his eye might not spare for pity, favour, or affection. All that belonged to Ahab must be slain, Kg2 9:8. A pattern is given him of the destruction intended, in the destruction of the families of Jeroboam and Baasha (Kg2 9:9), and he is particularly directed to throw Jezebel to the dogs, Kg2 9:10. The whole stock of royal blood was little enough, and too little, to atone for the blood of the prophets, the saints and martyrs, which, in God's account, is of great price.

The prophet, having done this errand, made the best of his way home again, and left Jehu alone to consider what he had to do and beg direction from God.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 1–10. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
ON THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS 9:1-24
“Then the prophet Elisha called a member of the company of prophets and said to him, ‘Gird up your loins; take this flask of oil in your hand, and go to Ramoth-gilead.’ ” Here the Scripture reports the just sentence that befalls the house of Ahab. Immediately it speaks about the choice of the judge and executor of the judgment. And this was Jehu, the son of Nimshi, who, on the word of the Lord, anointed one of the prophets for the royalty. And this was the disciple of Elisha who was sent by his master to the city of Ramoth-gilead, which was under the siege of the Israelites. He entered their camp and went to the tent where the commanders of the army gathered and standing before them, he naively said, “I have a message for you, commander.” Jehu said in reply, “For which one of us?” The servant realized that he was the one indicated by Elisha. In fact, he did not know his name, but even though the son of the prophet did not know him nor had ever seen him, he saw the importance of this situation, and his mind was troubled, so that he said, “For you, commander.” He showed that through the revelation of God he had realized that he was the one chosen by God. And immediately he took him into an inner chamber, according to the order of his master. And two things were also hidden: Jehu understood that that affair had to remain secret and that the news [of the anointing] should not be divulged at that time among the people. Therefore he anointed him and ordered him to take revenge against the house of Ahab. Then the prophet fled at once from the camp, and shortly later the entire assembly was in an admirable unanimity before king Jehu against Israel.So he went out with a group of select men. But he met Joram, king of Israel, in the course of his journey, and little later Ahaziah, king of Judah. He was able to defeat them after the first attack and killed them both. Jehu said to Bidkar, “ ‘Lift him out, and throw him on the plot of ground belonging to Naboth the Jezreelite,’ because last night I saw the blood of Naboth and the blood of his children.” He is thinking here about what had been said to him at night, or maybe he believes that this vengeance and the fact that he would kill Joram had been predicted to him at night through a vision. Jehu had also indicated to Bidkar another reason for killing Joram in his place and for ordering him to throw him on the plot of Naboth, saying, “When you and I rode side by side behind his father Ahab how the Lord uttered this oracle against him: ‘For the blood of Naboth and for the blood of his children that I saw yesterday, says the Lord, I swear I will repay you on this very plot of ground,’ ” that is, outside the walls of Jezreel where the goods of Naboth were. After this action accomplished outside the gates of Jezreel, he entered the city to complete what he had successfully begun.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 9:5 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.