Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
¶ In the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah began Jehoash the son of Jehoahaz to reign over Israel in Samaria, and reigned sixteen years.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
In the thirty H7970 H8141 and seventh H7651 year H8141 of Joash H3101 king H4428 of Judah H3063 began Jehoash H3060 the son H1121 of Jehoahaz H3059 to reign H4427 over Israel H3478 in Samaria H8111, and reigned sixteen H8337 H6240 years H8141.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
It was in the thirty-seventh year of Yo'ash king of Y'hudah that Yo'ash the son of Y'ho'achaz began his rule over Isra'el in Shomron; he ruled for sixteen years.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
In the thirty-seventh year of the reign of Joash over Judah, Jehoash son of Jehoahaz became king of Israel in Samaria, and he reigned sixteen years.
Ask
American Standard Version
In the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah began Jehoash the son of Jehoahaz to reign over Israel in Samaria, and reigned sixteen years.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
In the thirty-seventh year of Joash king of Judah, Jehoash the son of Jehoahaz began to reign over Israel in Samaria for sixteen years.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
In the seuen and thirtieth yere of Ioash King of Iudah began Iehoash the sonne of Iehoahaz to reigne ouer Israel in Samaria, and reigned sixteene yeere,
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
In the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah reigned hath Jehoash son of Jehoahaz over Israel, in Samaria--sixteen years,
Ask
In the KJVVerse 9,882 of 31,102

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

This verse precisely dates the beginning of Jehoash's sixteen-year reign over the Northern Kingdom of Israel, placing it in the thirty-seventh regnal year of Joash, king of Judah. It serves as a crucial chronological marker within the historical narrative of the divided monarchy, highlighting the meticulous record-keeping of the biblical authors and setting the stage for Jehoash's significant interactions with the prophet Elisha and his military campaigns against Syria, which would bring a measure of relief to the oppressed nation.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: This verse is strategically positioned within 2 Kings 13, a chapter that meticulously chronicles the reigns of two successive kings of Israel, Jehoahaz and his son Jehoash, and their pivotal interactions with the venerable prophet Elisha. The preceding verses (2 Kings 13:1-9) detail the wicked reign of Jehoahaz, during which the Northern Kingdom suffered severe oppression and military defeat at the hands of the Arameans (Syrians), a direct consequence of Israel's persistent idolatry and abandonment of Yahweh. 2 Kings 13:9 explicitly records the death and burial of Jehoahaz, making 2 Kings 13:10 the immediate and essential chronological transition, announcing the accession of his son, Jehoash. This precise chronological synchronization with the reign of the contemporary king of Judah is a hallmark of the books of Kings, designed to interweave the parallel histories of the two kingdoms and provide a coherent narrative framework. Jehoash's subsequent reign will be marked by significant events, notably his final, poignant encounter with the dying prophet Elisha (2 Kings 13:14-19) and his partial fulfillment of Elisha's prophecies through military victories against Syria.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The period described in 2 Kings 13 was a time of profound national crisis, political instability, and spiritual degradation for the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The nation was under severe and prolonged oppression from Aram (Syria), particularly under the formidable kings Hazael and his son Ben-Hadad, a divine judgment for Israel's persistent sin and idolatry, especially the calf worship introduced by Jeroboam. The mention of "Samaria" as the capital city of Israel is significant, as it was a highly fortified and strategically vital urban center, often symbolizing the Northern Kingdom's religious apostasy and political intrigue since its founding by Omri (1 Kings 16:24). The practice of synchronizing the reigns of the kings of Israel with those of Judah (e.g., "in the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah") was a sophisticated and common method of ancient Near Eastern historiography, reflecting the biblical authors' commitment to establishing a coherent and verifiable timeline for the divided monarchy. This era also witnessed the continued, albeit challenging, ministry of prophets like Elisha, who served as God's unwavering voice to kings and people, offering both stern warnings of impending judgment and profound promises of divine mercy and deliverance, even amidst widespread national unfaithfulness.
  • Key Themes: This concise verse, while primarily a historical record, contributes significantly to several overarching theological and narrative themes prevalent throughout the books of Kings. Firstly, it underscores Chronological Precision and the Bible's meticulous attention to historical detail. The precise dating of Jehoash's accession, cross-referenced with the reign of Joash of Judah, highlights the divine oversight of history, demonstrating that human events, including the rise and fall of kings, unfold within a divinely orchestrated timeline. Secondly, it exemplifies the recurring theme of the Succession of Kings and the ongoing cycle of leadership in ancient Israel. Each succession brought new challenges and opportunities, often reflecting the spiritual state of the nation and its leaders. Jehoash's reign, though marked by his continuation in the sins of Jeroboam (2 Kings 13:11), would nonetheless see God's hand at work in providing partial deliverance from Syrian oppression (2 Kings 13:25). Finally, the verse implicitly reinforces the enduring reality of the Divided Kingdom, a central and tragic theme since the schism recorded in 1 Kings 12:19. The parallel reigns and intertwined fates of Israel and Judah, despite their political and religious separation, are consistently emphasized through such synchronized dating, highlighting God's continued engagement with both branches of His covenant people.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • Jehoash (Hebrew, Yᵉhôwʼâsh', H3060): This name, derived from YHVH (Jehovah) and a word perhaps related to "fire," carries the meaning "Jehovah-fired." This theophoric name, common in ancient Israel, reflects a theological understanding that kingship, and indeed the very existence and vitality of a ruler, is ultimately a divine endowment. Despite the Northern Kingdom's consistent idolatry and Jehoash's own moral failings (as indicated by his continuation in the sins of Jeroboam, as noted in 2 Kings 13:11), the name subtly points to God's continued involvement and sovereign hand in Israel's history, even in raising up imperfect leaders who would nonetheless serve His purposes.
  • reign (Hebrew, mâlak', H4427): This primitive root verb signifies "to reign" or, inceptively, "to ascend the throne." It can also causatively mean "to induct into royalty." The act of reigning implies authority, governance, and the exercise of power. In the context of the Israelite monarchy, the king's reign was understood to be under the ultimate sovereignty of Yahweh, even when the human king acted disobediently. The mention of Jehoash beginning to "reign" formally marks his assumption of royal authority and responsibility over the Northern Kingdom, initiating a new chapter in its turbulent history.
  • Samaria (Hebrew, Shômᵉrôwn', H8111): Derived from a word meaning "watch-station," Samaria was the strategically vital capital city of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, founded by King Omri (1 Kings 16:24). Its elevated and fortified position made it a formidable stronghold. However, Samaria also tragically became a hub of political intrigue and, more significantly, a prominent center for idolatrous worship, particularly of Baal, under kings like Ahab and Jezebel. Its explicit mention in this verse grounds the narrative geographically and clearly identifies the specific kingdom over which Jehoash ruled, underscoring the ongoing spiritual and political distinction from the Southern Kingdom of Judah.

Verse Breakdown

  • "In the thirty and seventh year of Joash king of Judah": This precise chronological marker is profoundly significant, serving as a critical synchronism for interweaving the parallel histories of the Northern Kingdom (Israel) and the Southern Kingdom (Judah). By anchoring Jehoash's accession to the established timeline of Judah's king, Joash, the biblical author provides a robust framework for understanding the contemporary political and spiritual landscape of the divided monarchy. This meticulous consistency underscores the historical reliability of the biblical record and the careful nature of its composition, allowing for accurate chronological reconstruction.
  • "began Jehoash the son of Jehoahaz to reign over Israel in Samaria": This clause formally announces the royal succession of Jehoash, identifying him by his paternal lineage as the son of the recently deceased Jehoahaz. His rule "over Israel in Samaria" explicitly designates him as the sovereign of the Northern Kingdom, with Samaria serving as its administrative and symbolic capital. This transition of power, while marking a new reign, often brought with it continuations or shifts in national policy, alliances, and, most crucially, the nation's spiritual trajectory, though in Jehoash's case, the narrative indicates a continuation of the idolatrous practices of his predecessors.
  • "[and reigned] sixteen years": This concluding detail provides the exact duration of Jehoash's kingship. The length of a king's reign was a standard and essential feature of biblical regnal formulas, offering a concise summary of his period of rule and serving as a key data point for chronological reconstruction. Jehoash's sixteen-year reign would be a period of significant events, including his notable interaction with the prophet Elisha and subsequent military successes against the Arameans, which brought a measure of relief and recovery to the long-suffering nation of Israel.

Literary Devices

The verse primarily functions as a Chronological Marker, precisely dating the commencement of Jehoash's reign by cross-referencing it with the reign of the contemporary king of Judah. This meticulous dating is a characteristic and consistent feature throughout the books of Kings, establishing a coherent and verifiable historical timeline for the complex narrative of the divided monarchy. Furthermore, the verse employs a standard Regnal Formula, a recurring literary pattern utilized to introduce new kings and provide essential details about their accession. This formulaic structure typically includes the new king's name, his parentage, the kingdom he rules, its capital, and the duration of his reign. This consistent structure provides clarity, consistency, and a clear sense of historical progression, allowing readers to easily track the succession and duration of each monarch's rule within the broader biblical narrative.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

This verse, though seemingly a mere historical record, is deeply embedded within the overarching theological narrative of God's sovereignty over history. The meticulous dating underscores that human events, including the rise and fall of kings and the destinies of nations, unfold not by chance but within a divinely ordained and meticulously orchestrated framework. Even in the midst of Israel's spiritual decline, persistent idolatry, and political instability, God's overarching plan for His covenant people continues to unfold. The succession of Jehoash, despite his father's wickedness and his own moral compromises, points to God's enduring patience and His continued working through chosen (though often deeply flawed) instruments to achieve His purposes. It also implicitly highlights the themes of divine judgment and mercy, as the kings' actions directly impacted the nation's welfare, yet God often provided reprieve and a measure of deliverance through His prophets, demonstrating His enduring covenant faithfulness even when His people were unfaithful.

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

While 2 Kings 13:10 appears as a simple historical entry, it invites profound reflection on God's active and meticulous involvement in human history. The precise dating reminds us that God is not a distant observer but a sovereign Lord who meticulously orchestrates the flow of time, raising up and bringing down leaders according to His inscrutable will and overarching purposes. This truth challenges us to perceive even the seemingly mundane details of life and history as integral parts of a larger, divinely woven tapestry. For us today, this verse underscores the immense importance of leadership and the profound, far-reaching impact of those in authority, both on a national and a personal level within our communities and families. It calls us to a posture of active prayer for our leaders, recognizing that their choices have significant consequences for society, and to trust that even amidst political turmoil, societal challenges, or ungodly leadership, God remains firmly on His throne, working out His eternal purposes. Ultimately, we are reminded that our ultimate hope and security are not to be placed in fallible human rulers but in the unchanging King of Kings, whose reign is eternal, perfect, and just.

Questions for Reflection

  • How does the Bible's meticulous attention to historical detail, as exemplified in this verse, strengthen your faith in its reliability and God's sovereign control over time and human events?
  • What does this verse, when considered within the broader context of the kings of Israel and Judah, teach us about the spiritual responsibility inherent in leadership and its profound impact on a nation or community?
  • How might understanding the biblical "regnal formula" and the significance of chronological markers inform our prayers for current leaders and our engagement with political processes, knowing that God is ultimately in control of all earthly authorities?

FAQ

Why does the Bible include such precise chronological details for kings?

Answer: These meticulous details serve several critical purposes within the biblical narrative. Firstly, they establish the historical veracity and reliability of the biblical account, allowing for potential cross-referencing with other ancient Near Eastern records and demonstrating the Bible's commitment to factual and verifiable reporting. Secondly, they provide a coherent and synchronized timeline for the parallel histories of the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah, helping readers understand the complex interplay and contemporary events between the two kingdoms. Theologically, these precise markers underscore God's absolute sovereignty over time and history, showing that all events, including the rise and fall of human rulers, unfold according to His divine plan and not by mere chance. For example, the synchronism here between Jehoash of Israel and Joash of Judah allows for a clear understanding of the contemporary political and spiritual landscape of the divided monarchy.

Is this Jehoash the same as King Joash of Judah?

Answer: No, they are distinct individuals, although their names are very similar and can easily cause confusion. This verse explicitly refers to "Jehoash the son of Jehoahaz" who began to reign "over Israel in Samaria," clearly identifying him as the king of the Northern Kingdom. The "Joash king of Judah" mentioned in the same verse (whose thirty-seventh year is used as a chronological reference point) is the king of the Southern Kingdom, whose reign is detailed in 2 Kings 12. The similar names highlight a common naming convention in ancient Israel, where variations of the divine name "Yahweh" were often incorporated. However, careful attention to the context, particularly the kingdom over which each king ruled, is essential to differentiate between these historically significant but distinct individuals.

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

While 2 Kings 13:10 is a historical record of a human king's succession, it subtly yet profoundly points to the ultimate and eternal King, Jesus Christ. The constant cycle of imperfect human rulers—kings like Jehoash, who, despite bringing temporary relief, were ultimately limited by time, flawed by sin, and eventually succeeded by others—underscores humanity's deep and abiding need for a perfect and everlasting King. Unlike the kings of Israel and Judah, whose reigns were finite, often marked by unfaithfulness, and always subject to the vicissitudes of human weakness, Jesus's reign is eternal, without blemish, and perfectly righteous. He is the true Son of David, the promised Messiah whose kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36) yet rules over all creation. The meticulous chronological details preserved throughout the Old Testament, including this seemingly simple verse, form part of the grand historical narrative that culminates in Christ's advent, demonstrating God's unwavering faithfulness across generations to bring about His redemptive plan for humanity. Every earthly king, whether good or bad, ultimately served as a shadow or a stark contrast, pointing forward to the one who would truly deliver His people from their ultimate enemies—not merely a regional power like Syria, but sin and death itself. Jesus is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, and the King of kings and Lord of lords, whose kingdom will have no end (Luke 1:33).

Copy as

Commentary on 2 Kings 13 verses 10–19

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

We have here Jehoash, or Joash, the son of Jehoahaz and grandson of Jehu, upon the throne of Israel. Probably the house of Jehu intended some respect to the house of David when they gave this heir-apparent to the crown the same name with him that was then king of Judah.

I. The general account here given of him and his reign is much the same with what we have already met with, and has little in it remarkable, Kg2 13:10-13. He was none of the worst, and yet, because he kept up that ancient and politic idolatry of the house of Jeroboam, it is said, He did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord. That one evil was enough to leave an indelible mark of infamy upon his name; for, how little evil soever men saw in it, it was, in the sight of the Lord, a very wicked thing; and we are sure that his judgment is according to truth. It is observable how lightly the inspired penman passes over his acts, and his might wherewith he warred, leaving it to the common historians to record them, while he takes notice only of the respect he showed to Elisha. One good action shall make a better figure in God's book than twenty great ones; and, in his account, it gains a man a much better reputation to honour a prophet than to conquer a king and his army.

II. The particular account of what passed between him and Elisha has several things in it remarkable.

1.Elisha fell sick, Kg2 13:14. Observe, (1.) He lived long; for it was now about sixty years since he was first called to be a prophet. It was a great mercy to Israel, and especially to the sons of the prophets, that he was continued so long a burning and shining light. Elijah finished his testimony in a fourth part of that time. God's prophets have their day set them, some longer, others shorter, as Infinite Wisdom sees fit. (2.) All the latter part of his time, from the anointing of Jehu, which was forty-five years before Joash began his reign, we find no mention made of him, or of any thing he did, till we find him here upon his death-bed. He might be useful to the last, and yet not so famous as he had sometimes been. The time of his flourishing was less than the time of his living. Let not old people complain of obscurity, but rather be well pleased with retirement. (3.) The spirit of Elijah rested on Elisha, and yet he was not sent for to heaven in a fiery chariot, as Elijah was, but went the common road out of the world, and was visited with the visitation of all men. If God honour some above others, who yet are not inferior to them in gifts or graces, who shall find fault? May he not do what he will with his own?

2.King Joash visited him in his sickness, and wept over him, Kg2 13:14. This was an evidence of some good in him, that he had a value and affection for a faithful prophet; so far was he from hating and persecuting him as a troubler of Israel that he loved and honoured him as one of the greatest blessings of his kingdom, and lamented the loss of him. There have been those who would not be obedient to the word of God, and yet have the faithful ministers of it so manifested in their consciences that they could not but have an honour for them. Observe here, (1.) When the king heard of Elisha's sickness he came to visit him, and to receive his dying counsel and blessing; and it was no disparagement to him, though a king, thus to honour one whom God honoured. Note, It may turn much to our spiritual advantage to attend the sick-beds and death-beds of good ministers and other good men, that we may learn to die, and may be encouraged in religion by the living comforts they have from it in a dying hour. (2.) Though Elisha was very old, had been a great while useful, and, in the course of nature, could not continue long, yet the king, when he saw him sick and likely to die, wept over him. The aged are most experienced and therefore can worst be spared. In many causes, one old witness is worth ten young ones. (3.) He lamented him in the same words with which Elisha had himself lamented the removal of Elijah: My father, my father. It is probable he had heard or read them in that famous story. Note, Those that give just honours to the generation that goes before them are often recompensed with the like from the generation that comes after them. He that watereth, that watereth with tears, shall be watered, shall be so watered, also himself, when it comes to his own turn, Pro 11:25. (4.) This king was herein selfish; he lamented the loss of Elisha because he was as the chariot and horsemen of Israel, and therefore could be ill spared when Israel was so poor in chariots and horsemen, as we find they were (Kg2 13:7), when they had in all but fifty horsemen and ten chariots. Those who consider how much good men contribute to the defence of a nation, and the keeping off of God's judgments, will see cause to lament the removal of them.

3.Elisha gave the king great assurances of his success against the Syrians, Israel's present oppressors, and encouraged him to prosecute the war against them with vigour. Elisha was aware that therefore he was loth to part with him because he looked upon him as the great bulwark of the kingdom against that common enemy, and depended much upon his blessings and prayers in his designs against them. "Well," says Elisha, "if that be the cause of your grief, let not that trouble thee, for thou shalt be victorious over the Syrians when I am in my grave. I die, but God will surely visit you. He has the residue of the Spirit, and can raise up other prophets to pray for you." God's grace is not tied to one hand. He can bury his workmen and yet carry on his work. To animate the king against the Syrians he gives him a sign, orders him to take bow and arrows (Kg2 13:15), to intimate to him that, in order to the deliverance of his kingdom from the Syrians, he must put himself into a military posture and resolve to undergo the perils and fatigues of war. God would be the agent, but he must be the instrument. And that he should be successful he gives him a token, by directing him,

(1.)To shoot an arrow towards Syria, Kg2 13:16, Kg2 13:17. The king, no doubt, knew how to manage a bow better than the prophet did, and yet, because the arrow now to be shot was to have its significancy from the divine institution, as if he were now to be disciplined, he received the words of command from the prophet: Put thy hand upon the bow - Open the window - Shoot. Nay, as if he had been a child that never drew a bow before, Elisha put his hands upon the king's hands, to signify that in all his expeditions against the Syrians he must look up to God for direction and strength, must reckon his own hands not sufficient for him, but go on in a dependence upon divine aid. He teacheth my hands to war, Psa 18:34; Psa 144:1. The trembling hands of a dying prophet, as they signified the concurrence and communication of the power of God, gave this arrow more force than the hands of the king in his full strength. The Syrians had made themselves masters of the country that lay eastward, Kg2 10:33. Thitherward therefore the arrow was directed, and such an interpretation given by the prophet of the shooting of this arrow, though shot in one respect at random, as made it, [1.] A commission to the king to attack the Syrians, notwithstanding their power and possession. [2.] A promise of success therein. It is the arrow of the Lord's deliverance, even the arrow of deliverance from Syria. It is God that commands deliverance; and, when he will effect it, who can hinder? The arrow of deliverance is his. He shoots out his arrows, and the work is done, Psa 18:14. "Thou shalt smite the Syrians in Aphek, where they are now encamped, or where they are to have a general rendezvous of their forces, till thou have consumed those of them that are vexatious and oppressive to thee and thy kingdom."

(2.)To strike with the arrows, Kg2 13:18, Kg2 13:19. The prophet having in God's name assured him of victory over the Syrians, he will now try him and see what improvement he will make of his victories, whether he will push them on with more zeal than Ahab did when Benhadad lay at his mercy. For the trial of this he bids him smite with the arrows on the ground: "Believe them brought to the ground by the arrow of the Lord's deliverance, and laid at thy feet; and now show me what thou wilt do to them when thou hast them down, whether thou wilt do as David did when God gave him the necks of his enemies, beat them small as the dust before the wind," Psa 18:40, Psa 18:42. The king showed not that eagerness and flame which one might have expected upon this occasion, but smote thrice, and no more. Either out of foolish tenderness to the Syrians, he smote as if he were afraid of hurting them, at least of ruining them, willing to show mercy to those that never did, nor ever would, show mercy to him or his people. Or, perhaps, he smote thrice, and very coldly, because he thought it but a silly thing, that it looked idle and childish for a king to beat the floor with his arrows; and thrice was often enough for him to play the fool merely to please the prophet. But, by contemning the sign, he lost the thing signified, sorely to the grief of the dying prophet, who was angry with him, and told him he should have smitten five or six times. Not being straitened in the power and promise of God, why should he be straitened in his own expectations and endeavours? Note, It cannot but be a trouble to good men to see those they wish well to stand in their own light and forsake their own mercies, to see them lose their advantages against their spiritual enemies, and to give them advantage.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 10–19. Public domain.
Copy as
Ephrem the SyrianAD 373
ON THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS 13:14-19
“Now when Elisha had fallen sick with the illness from which he was to die, King Joash of Israel went down to him and wept before him, crying, “My father, my father! The chariots of Israel and its horsemen!” And Jehu, king of Israel, died, and Jehoahaz, his son, took his place for seventeen years and died. And his son Joash reigned; he reestablished the kingship which had been troubled by his father, and fought impiety. Elisha helped him with words and actions. And when the prophet was struck with a fatal disease, the king came to him and, seeing that his death was imminent, began to weep like a son deprived of his father and said, “My father, my father,” and so on. This is also the word that Elisha said at the moment of Elijah’s ascension to heaven. And the meaning of both words is one, and we have explained it above.Then he calls the prophet “chariots and horsemen of Israel,” because the peace of the kingdom and the victories of Israel depended on his prayer and rule. The prophet, on his part, rewarded the love of his tears and “said to him, ‘Take a bow and arrows.’ Elisha laid his hands on the king’s hands” and ordered him to open the window turned eastwards and to shoot the arrow. And he shot the arrow. And Elisha said, “The Lord’s arrow of victory, the arrow of victory over Aram!” Indeed, the window was turned towards Aram. “You shall fight the Arameans in Aphek until you have made an end of them.”
This passage suggests two spiritual meanings. The first is that God has bound the victory of the children of Israel to that sign, which is not a new thing: it existed for many centuries, [as was demonstrated] a few centuries before when the Lord made the plagues of Egypt and the liberation of the people depend on the lifting of the rod of Moses, and the destruction of Amalek on the lifting of his hands during the prayer and the destruction of the city of Ai on the lifting of the javelin of Joshua. It was appropriate that that situation was carried out in that manner, so that the people might clearly recognize with certainty the aid that God had given them and, at the moment of receiving such grace, the memory of grace might penetrate into their hearts. But only Elisha clearly knew the mystery, whereas it was hidden to the king; otherwise, he would have not struck the ground three times but ten. And since he was hesitant and drew back, Elisha blamed him—not because he had committed any fault but because his mistake deprived the children of his people of the victory and the great profit that would have derived from the extermination of the Arameans and the overthrowing of their kingdom that Elisha strongly desired. He is sad for being frustrated in his hope by the king who had stopped and had not multiplied the prescribed strokes. But the real motive which prevented the grace was the apostasy of the king and the people and their rebellious will in the worship of idols. That was again the cause that hindered the gift of the grace that was signified in that sign.
The fact that Elisha laid his hands on the hands of the king shows that the weak hands of the king would be strengthened by the power that dwelled in the hands of the prophet, who stood here in the place of his master, so that those hands might be capable of destroying Aram and to exterminate it after it had destroyed and exterminated Israel. It is clear that the children of Israel, at the time of Joram, had diminished a great deal because in the royal city only 5 horses, and at the time of his son, only 10 chariots were available in their entire land and 50 horsemen, and only 10, foot soldiers, as the Scripture says, because the king of Aram had made them perish and had made them like the dust at threshing. Now the Hebrews, at the time of Solomon, had 52, horses in the stables of the king, and Jeroboam sent to war 800, men, and Abijah lined up against them 400, brave men whom he had gathered from the two tribes of Judah and Benjamin.
The second spiritual meaning is the following: this sign is divided into two figures, and each of them possesses its own meaning: “The Lord’s arrow of victory” clearly signifies our Lord and Savior hanging from the wood and giving up his spirit. In his spirit he descends into the fortresses and the castle of Sheol and delivers the righteous, who were imprisoned there, and after his resurrection, he subdues the entire universe through the holy apostles and gives new life to those who believe in his name.
On the other hand, the fact that the arrow was shot from the window placed eastwards means that the accomplishment of our salvation has been obtained through the ascension of our Lord, as he rides higher than the heavens of the eastern heavens, and through his ascension he raises the eternal gates and makes us ascend as a host of the captives of heaven. Again the arrow stuck into the ground and then pulled out or departing from the ground signifies the burial of our Lord and his resurrection after he had descended and remained in the heart of the Sheol and in the land of the dead. Observe also, with discernment, that the land of Israel has been struck with three arrows, but the kingdom of Aram has been defeated in three battles, in the likeness of the adorable body of our Lord, which was tried with the thorns, the nails and the sword but was not corrupted. The power of death, of Satan, has been crushed three times. Indeed, [the Lord] annihilated Satan and banished sin and death. Again the arrow is shot three times and stays on the ground, but the Lord raises up the people of the Lord who had been thrown onto the ground, as also Christ was placed in the tomb and gave the hope of resurrection to the saints.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying 2 Kings 13:10 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.