Ezra 4:16

We certify the king that, if this city be builded [again], and the walls thereof set up, by this means thou shalt have no portion on this side the river.

We {H586} certify {H3046} the king {H4430} that, if {H2006} this {H1791} city {H7149} be builded {H1124} again, and the walls {H7792} thereof set up {H3635}, by this {H1836} means {H6903} thou shalt have {H383} no {H3809} portion {H2508} on this side {H5675} the river {H5103}.

We submit to the king that if this city is rebuilt and the walls are finished, you will soon lose possession of all territories beyond the River."

We advise the king that if this city is rebuilt and its walls are restored, you will have no dominion west of the Euphrates.

We certify the king that, if this city be builded, and the walls finished, by this means thou shalt have no portion beyond the River.

Commentary

Context

Ezra 4:16 is part of a letter written by the adversaries of Judah and Benjamin to King Artaxerxes I of Persia. These adversaries, primarily Samaritans and other peoples settled in the region, were attempting to halt the rebuilding efforts of the Jewish exiles who had returned from Babylonian captivity under the leadership of Zerubbabel and Joshua. While the primary focus initially was the Temple, the rebuilding of the city walls was seen as a crucial step towards re-establishing an independent Jewish state, which posed a perceived threat to Persian imperial control. This verse specifically highlights their political strategy: to convince the king that allowing the walls to be rebuilt would lead to a significant loss of revenue and control over the vital trans-Euphrates province.

Key Themes

  • Opposition to God's Work: This verse vividly illustrates the persistent opposition faced by God's people when engaged in His work. The adversaries used political maneuvering and false accusations to impede the divine mandate to restore Jerusalem.
  • Political Manipulation: The letter is a masterclass in political fear-mongering. The opponents appeal to the king's self-interest, warning of financial and territorial losses, rather than addressing the religious or moral aspects of the rebuilding.
  • Sovereignty Amidst Obstacles: Despite such formidable human opposition and the temporary success of these tactics (the work was indeed stopped for a time, as noted in Ezra 4:24), the narrative of Ezra ultimately shows God's plan prevailing.

Linguistic Insights

The phrase "no portion on this side the river" translates from the Aramaic 'abar nahara' (Χ’Χ‘Χ¨ נהרא), which literally means "beyond the river." This refers to the satrapy or province of Trans-Euphrates, a major administrative division of the Persian Empire that encompassed the lands west of the Euphrates River, including Judah. The adversaries' warning was a direct threat to the king's tax revenues and tribute from this economically and strategically important region, emphasizing the high stakes they presented to Artaxerxes.

Related Scriptures

The challenges faced by the Jewish exiles in Ezra are reminiscent of later struggles. For instance, Nehemiah also faced intense opposition from Sanballat and Tobiah when he later sought to rebuild Jerusalem's walls. This pattern of spiritual and political resistance against God's purposes is a recurring theme throughout biblical history. Despite the cunning of their enemies, the rebuilding of the Temple eventually resumed and was completed under the decree of King Darius I, as detailed in Ezra 6:1-12, demonstrating God's faithfulness to His promises of restoration following the Babylonian captivity.

Practical Application

Ezra 4:16 serves as a powerful reminder that those who commit to God's work may encounter significant resistance. This opposition can manifest through political pressure, false accusations, economic threats, or social ostracism. Believers today can draw encouragement from this passage, understanding that setbacks and delays do not signify God's abandonment. Rather, they highlight the spiritual battle at play. It calls us to persevere in faith, trusting in God's ultimate sovereignty to accomplish His purposes, even when human obstacles seem insurmountable.

Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated β€” the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

  • 1 Kings 4:24 (2 votes)

    For he had dominion over all [the region] on this side the river, from Tiphsah even to Azzah, over all the kings on this side the river: and he had peace on all sides round about him.
  • Ezra 4:20 (2 votes)

    There have been mighty kings also over Jerusalem, which have ruled over all [countries] beyond the river; and toll, tribute, and custom, was paid unto them.
  • 2 Samuel 8:3 (2 votes)

    David smote also Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates.