Skip to content

נְוָלוּ

nᵉvâlûw /nev-aw-loo'/ Ask about this word
(Aramaic) or נְוָלִי; (Aramaic), from an unused root probably meaning to be foul; a sink
dunghill.
Copy as

Core Meaning & Semantic Range

The Aramaic word nᵉvâlûw, represented by H5122, refers to a dunghill or sink. It comes from a root that suggests something foul. This term appears 3 times across 3 unique verses, exclusively as a symbol of complete ruin and public disgrace.

Biblical Occurrences & Contextual Analysis

In the biblical narrative, H5122 is consistently used within the context of severe royal decrees. In Daniel, King Nebuchadnezzar threatens that the houses of his Chaldeans will be made a dunghill if they fail to interpret his dream Daniel 2:5. Later, after the deliverance of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, he decrees the same fate for anyone who speaks against their God Daniel 3:29. Similarly, in Ezra, King Darius decrees that the house of anyone who alters his command regarding the temple will be made a dunghill Ezra 6:11.

Related Words & Concepts

Several related Aramaic words clarify the context of this severe punishment:

  • H1917 haddâm (piece): This word describes something stamped to pieces. It is used in direct parallel with H5122 as part of the same sentence of judgment, where offenders shall be "cut in pieces, and their houses shall be made a dunghill" (Daniel 2:5, Daniel 3:29).
  • H5648 ʻăbad (make): This verb, meaning to do or make, is used to enact the punishment. For example, the decree states "let his house be made a dunghill" Ezra 6:11. The word's broader usage includes actions of kings, such as when Nebuchadnezzar "made an image of gold" Daniel 3:1.

Theological Significance

The thematic weight of H5122 is significant in understanding authority and judgment in the narratives of Daniel and Ezra.

  • Symbol of Total Desolation: To have one's house turned into a dunghill was a sentence of ultimate disgrace, wiping out not just the structure but also the family's name and honor.
  • Instrument of Royal Authority: The threat is always issued by a powerful king—Nebuchadnezzar or Darius—to enforce absolute obedience to a decree. It represents the highest form of state-sanctioned punishment (Daniel 2:5, Ezra 6:11).
  • Penalty for Defiance: In every case, this punishment is the stated consequence for failure or disobedience, whether against a king's command or, in a unique turn, against the God of Israel Daniel 3:29.

Summary

In summary, H5122 is more than just a place of refuse; it is a powerful biblical symbol of judgment. Used exclusively in royal threats, it communicates a sentence of complete and shameful destruction. Its appearance in both Daniel and Ezra highlights a shared understanding of this punishment as the ultimate consequence for defying the highest authority, be it a human king or the God he comes to recognize.

Grammatical Forms

In the Hebrew Old Testament, this word appears as a noun across 3 occurrences, inflected in 1 grammatical form.

  • Singular common gender Absolute
Singular
One.
common gender
Either gender — the form does not distinguish.
Absolute
The independent form of a noun (not bound to another).

Theographic Context

Biblical Distribution

Appears in 3 verses across 2 books. Most frequent in Daniel (2 verses).

1
Ezra
2
Daniel

Verse Explorer

Select a verse to begin.