Skip to content
Translation
King James Version
And now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious unto us: this hath been by your means: will he regard your persons? saith the LORD of hosts.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And now, I pray you, beseech H2470 H6440 God H410 that he will be gracious H2603 unto us: this hath been by your means H3027: will he regard H5375 your persons H6440? saith H559 the LORD H3068 of hosts H6635.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
So if you pray now that God will show us favor, what your actions have accomplished is that ADONAI-Tzva'ot asks, "Will he receive any of you?
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
“But ask now for God’s favor. Will He be gracious? Since this has come from your hands, will He show you favor?” asks the LORD of Hosts.
Ask
American Standard Version
And now, I pray you, entreat the favor of God, that he may be gracious unto us: this hath been by your means: will he accept any of your persons? saith Jehovah of hosts.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“Now, please entreat the favor of God, that he may be gracious to us. With this, will he accept any of you?” says the LORD of Hosts.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And nowe, I pray you, pray before God, that he may haue mercie vpon vs: this hath beene by your meanes: will hee regard your persons, sayth the Lord of hostes?
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
And now, appease, I pray thee, the face of God, And He doth favour us; From your own hand hath this been, Doth He accept of you appearances? Said Jehovah of Hosts.
Ask

Study This Verse

SUMMARY

Malachi 1:9 presents a cutting rhetorical challenge from the LORD to the priests and the people of Israel, exposing the profound hypocrisy and spiritual apathy that had permeated their worship. Having offered defiled and unworthy sacrifices, they are sarcastically invited to plead for God's grace, with the implicit and damning question of whether a holy God would indeed "regard their persons" or accept their pleas, given their contemptuous actions. The verse powerfully underscores the inseparable link between genuine reverence and divine favor, highlighting God's uncompromising demand for integrity in worship.

CONTEXT

  • Literary Context: Malachi 1:9 is situated within the opening chapter of the book, which immediately establishes a confrontational tone between God and His people, particularly the priests. The preceding verses (Malachi 1:6-8) detail God's specific accusations against the priests for despising His name and defiling His altar by offering blind, lame, and sick animals for sacrifice—animals explicitly forbidden by the Mosaic Law for offerings (e.g., Leviticus 22:20-24). Verse 9 serves as the climax of this initial indictment, a rhetorical flourish that exposes the absurdity of their actions. It's a direct challenge to their presumption that God would bless them despite their flagrant disobedience, setting the stage for further rebukes regarding tithing, divorce, and social injustice throughout the book.
  • Historical & Cultural Context: The book of Malachi is set in the post-exilic period, likely around 450-430 BC, after the Jews had returned from Babylonian captivity and rebuilt the Second Temple (as chronicled in Ezra and Nehemiah). While the physical temple was restored, the spiritual fervor and covenant faithfulness had waned. The initial zeal had given way to complacency, cynicism, and ritualism. The priests, who were meant to be guardians of the Law and examples of piety, had become corrupt, performing their duties out of obligation rather than devotion. Economically, the people faced hardship, which they attributed to God's lack of favor, failing to see their own sin as the cause. This verse directly addresses their failure to uphold the covenant responsibilities, particularly regarding the quality of sacrifices, which was a fundamental aspect of their relationship with God under the Old Covenant.
  • Key Themes: This verse powerfully contributes to several overarching themes in Malachi. It highlights the theme of God's Sovereignty and Holiness, emphasizing that the "LORD of hosts" cannot be trifled with; His character demands pure and undefiled worship. It underscores the theme of Covenant Faithfulness, revealing how Israel's breach of the covenant through their defiled offerings directly impacted their relationship with God and His willingness to bless them. Furthermore, it introduces the theme of Integrity in Worship, asserting that God values the heart and quality of the offering over mere ritualistic performance. This theme is foundational to God's later pronouncements on their lack of tithes (Malachi 3:8-10) and their social injustices, demonstrating that true worship encompasses all aspects of life, not just temple rituals.

EXPOSITION AND ANALYSIS

Key Word Analysis

  • beseech (Hebrew, châlâh', H2470): This word, often translated as "to entreat" or "to make sick," carries a double entendre in this context. While it means to earnestly seek favor or make supplication, its root also implies weakness, sickness, or grief. Malachi uses it ironically: "Go ahead, try to make earnest supplication, but your actions have made the very act of seeking favor 'sick' or 'weak' in God's eyes." It highlights the futility of their insincere prayers.
  • gracious (Hebrew, chânan', H2603): Derived from a root meaning "to bend or stoop in kindness to an inferior," this term refers to the act of showing favor, mercy, or compassion. It's the very quality the people desperately needed from God. The rhetorical question implies that God's characteristic graciousness, which is freely given, cannot be coerced or expected when His people are actively despising Him through their actions.
  • regard your persons (Hebrew, _nâsâʼ _pânîym'__, H5375): This phrase literally means "to lift up the face" or "to show favor/partiality." The verb nâsâʼ means "to lift" or "to carry," and pânîym refers to "face" or "presence." In a judicial or relational context, to "lift up someone's face" signifies to show acceptance, favor, or to look upon them with approval. The rhetorical question, "will he regard your persons?", powerfully conveys God's refusal to show favor or accept their plea when their offerings and hearts are contemptible. It underscores His impartiality and justice.

Verse Breakdown

  • "And now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious unto us:" This opening clause is deeply ironic and sarcastic. God, through Malachi, challenges the priests and people to do precisely what they presume they can do—plead for divine favor. The implication is that such a plea, given their current state, is utterly hollow and presumptuous. It sets up the impending rebuke by highlighting their misplaced confidence.
  • "this hath been by your means:" This declarative statement serves as the damning indictment. The phrase "by your means" (literally "from your hand") directly attributes the current state of divine disfavor and the defilement of worship to the actions of the priests and the people. It removes any doubt about the source of the problem, placing the responsibility squarely on their shoulders, particularly their offering of blemished sacrifices.
  • "will he regard your persons?" This is the core rhetorical question, the punchline of God's sarcastic challenge. It questions whether God, the holy and just "LORD of hosts," would show favor, acceptance, or partiality to those who have so blatantly dishonored Him. The expected answer is a resounding "No." It emphasizes that God's favor is not automatic or unconditional; it is tied to genuine reverence and obedience.
  • "saith the LORD of hosts." This concluding authoritative declaration reinforces the divine origin and unchallengeable truth of the preceding statements. The title "LORD of hosts" (Yahweh Sabaoth) emphasizes God's supreme power, His command over all creation and heavenly armies, and His absolute holiness. It underscores the gravity of their offense against such a majestic and powerful God, making their disrespect all the more egregious.

Literary Devices

Malachi 1:9 is rich in Rhetorical Question, which is the primary literary device employed. The question "will he regard your persons?" is not meant to elicit an answer from the audience, but rather to make a forceful point, implying a self-evident negative response. This technique powerfully conveys God's indignation and the futility of their actions. Closely related is Irony, as God sarcastically invites them to seek grace while simultaneously highlighting the very actions that prevent it. There is also a subtle use of Anthropomorphism in "regard your persons," which literally refers to God "lifting up His face" to show favor, attributing a human-like action (facial expression) to God to convey His emotional and relational response. The repeated use of the divine title "LORD of hosts" serves as a form of Emphasis and Divine Authority, reinforcing the weight and unchallengeable nature of God's pronouncements.

THEOLOGICAL AND THEMATIC CONNECTIONS

Malachi 1:9 profoundly articulates God's demand for authentic worship and His intolerance for hypocrisy. It reveals that God's grace, while abundant, is not a license for irreverence or disobedience. The priests and people had reduced worship to a mere ritual, believing that outward performance could appease God regardless of the heart's condition or the quality of the offering. This verse shatters that illusion, asserting that God's favor is contingent upon genuine reverence and adherence to His covenant commands. It highlights God's unwavering holiness and justice, demonstrating that He cannot be mocked or manipulated by insincere devotion. Their defiled sacrifices were an insult to His majesty, and He would not "regard their persons" in such a state.

  • 1 Samuel 15:22: "And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams."
  • Isaiah 1:11-15: "To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats... When ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you: yea, when ye make many prayers, I will not hear: your hands are full of blood."
  • Proverbs 15:8: "The sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination to the LORD: but the prayer of the upright is his delight."

REFLECTION AND APPLICATION

Malachi 1:9 serves as a timeless mirror for believers today, challenging us to scrutinize the sincerity and integrity of our own worship and service to God. It forces us to ask whether our offerings—be they our time, talents, resources, or even our prayers—are truly our "best," offered with a heart of genuine reverence and love, or if they are merely convenient leftovers, given out of obligation or a desire for personal gain. God is not impressed by outward religious performance if our hearts are far from Him. This verse calls us to move beyond mere ritualism to a living, vibrant relationship where our entire lives are an act of worship. It reminds us that our actions have consequences in our relationship with God, and that true grace is received by those who approach Him with humility, repentance, and a desire to honor His name above all else.

Questions for Reflection

  • In what areas of my life might I be offering God "blemished sacrifices" – giving Him less than my best or acting out of obligation rather than devotion?
  • How does my daily life reflect the sincerity of my worship, beyond formal religious activities?
  • Am I truly seeking God's grace with a repentant heart, or am I presuming upon His favor despite my actions?
  • What practical steps can I take to cultivate a more genuine, heartfelt, and obedient approach to my relationship with God?

FAQ

What does "this hath been by your means" mean in Malachi 1:9?

Answer: The phrase "this hath been by your means" (KJV) or "this is your doing" (NIV) directly attributes the problem of God's disfavor and the defilement of worship to the actions of the priests and the people. The Hebrew literally translates to "from your hand" (מִיֶּדְכֶם, miyadekem), emphasizing their direct responsibility. It refers specifically to their practice of offering blemished, sick, blind, and lame animals as sacrifices, which was a direct violation of God's commands in the Law (e.g., Leviticus 22:20-24). God is essentially saying, "The reason you are in this predicament, the reason I am not showing you favor, is entirely due to your own disrespectful and disobedient actions."

CHRIST-CENTERED FULFILLMENT

Malachi 1:9, with its stark portrayal of defiled worship and the futility of seeking grace through blemished offerings, powerfully foreshadows the need for a perfect sacrifice and a new covenant. The priests' inability to offer acceptable sacrifices highlights humanity's pervasive sin and its inability to perfectly honor God. This deficiency finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. He is the perfect Lamb of God, without blemish or spot, whose once-for-all sacrifice on the cross perfectly atoned for sin, doing what the Old Testament sacrifices could never fully accomplish. Through His shed blood, we are made righteous, and our worship, though imperfect, is made acceptable to God through Him. Furthermore, Jesus is our great High Priest, who truly intercedes for us, enabling us to draw near to God with confidence—a stark contrast to the Malachi priests whose actions alienated them. Thus, the grace that the Malachi priests vainly sought through their defiled means is now freely offered to all who come to God through faith in Christ, whose perfect life and sacrifice truly "regarded our persons" and secured eternal favor.

Copy as

Commentary on Malachi 1 verses 6–14

I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

The prophet is here, by a special commission, calling the priests to account, though they were themselves appointed judges, to call the people to an account. Let the rulers in the house of God know that there is one above them, who will reckon with them for their mal-administrations. Thus saith the Lord of hosts to you, O priests! Mal 1:6. God will have a saying to unfaithful ministers; and it concerns those who speak from God to his people to hear and heed what he says to them, that they may save themselves in the first place, otherwise how should they help to save those that hear them? It is a severe, and no doubt a just reproof, that is here given to the priests, for the profanation of the holy things of God, with which they were entrusted; and, if this was the crime of the priests, we have reason to fear the people also were guilty of it: so that what is said to the priests is said to all, nay, it is said to us, who, as Christians, profess ourselves, not only the people of God, but priests to him. Observe here,

I. What it was that God expected from them, and with what good reason he expected it (Mal 1:6): A son honours his father, because he is his father; nature has written this law in the hearts of children, before God wrote it at Mount Sinai; nay, a servant, though his obligation to his master is not natural, but by voluntary compact, yet thinks it his duty to honour him, to be observant of his orders, and true to his interests. Children and servants pay respect to their parents and masters; every one cries out shame on them if they do not, and their own hearts cannot but reproach them too; the order of families is thus kept up, and it is their beauty and advantage. But the priests, who are God's children and his servants, do not fear and honour him. They were fathers and masters to the people, and expected to be called so (Jdg 18:19, Mat 22:7, Mat 22:10) and to be reverenced and obeyed as such; but they forgot their Father and Master in heaven, and the duty they owed to him. We may each of us charge upon ourselves what is here charged upon the priests. Note, 1. We are every one of us to look upon God as our Father and Master, and upon ourselves as his children and servants. 2. Our relation to God as our Father and Master strongly obliges us to fear and honour him. If we honour and fear the fathers of our flesh, much more the Father and Master of our spirits, Heb 12:9. 3. It is a thing to be justly complained of, and lamented, that God is so little feared and honoured even by those that own him for their Father and Master. Where is his honour? Where is his fear?

II. What the contempt was which the priests put upon God.

1.This is that, in general, which is charged upon them: - (1.) They despised God's name; their familiarity with it, as priests, bred contempt of it, and served them only to gain a veneration by it for themselves and their own name, while God's name was of small account with them. God's name is all that whereby he has made himself known - his word and ordinances; these they had low thoughts of, and vilified that which it was their business to magnify; and no wonder that when they despised it themselves they did that which made it despicable to others, causing even the sacrifices of the Lord to be abhorred, as Eli's sons did. (2.) They profaned God's name, Mal 1:12. They polluted it, Mal 1:7. They not only made no account of sacred things, but they made an ill use of them, and perverted them to the service of the worst and vilest purposes - their own pride, covetousness, and luxury. There cannot be a greater provocation to God than the profanation of his name; for it is holy and reverend. His purity cannot be polluted by us, for he is unspotted, but his name may be profaned; and nothing profanes it more than the misconduct of priests, whose business it is to do honour to it. This is the general charge exhibited against them. To this they plead Not guilty, and challenge God to prove it upon them, and to make good the charge, which added daring impudence to their daring impiety: You say, Wherein have we despised thy name? (Mal 1:6), and wherein have we polluted thee? Mal 1:7. It is common with proud sinners, when they are reproved, to stand thus upon their own justification. These priests had most horridly profaned sacred things, and yet, like the adulterous woman, they said that they had done no wickedness; they were so inobservant of themselves that they remembered not or reflected not upon their own acts, or they were so ignorant of the divine law that they thought there was no harm in them, and that what they did could not be construed into despising God's name, or they were so atheistical as to imagine that though they knew their own guilt yet God did not, or they were so scornful in their conduct towards God and his prophets that they took a pride in bantering a serious and just reproof, and turning it off with a jest. They either laugh at the reproof, as those that despise it, and harden their hearts against it, or they laugh it off, as those that resolve they will not be touched by it, or will not seem to be so. Which way soever we take it, their defence was their offence, and, in justifying themselves, their own tongues condemned them, and their saying, Wherein have we despised thy name? proved them proud and perverse. Had they asked this question with a humble desire to be told more particularly wherein they had offended, it would have been an evidence of their repentance, and would have given hopes of their reformation; but to ask it thus in disdain and defiance of the word of God argues their hearts fully set in them to do evil. Note, Sinners ruin themselves by studying to baffle their own convictions; but they will find it hard to kick against the pricks.

2.Justly might they have been convicted and condemned upon the general charge, and their plea thrown out as frivolous; but God will not only overcome, but will be clear, will be justified when he judges, and therefore he shows them very particularly wherein they had despised his name, and what the contempt was that they cast upon him. As formerly, when he charged them with idolatry, so now, when he charges them with profaneness, he bids them see their way in the valley and know what they have done, Jer 2:23.

(1.)They despised God's name in what they said, in the low opinion they had of his institutions: "You say in your hearts, and perhaps speak it out when you priests get together over your cups. out of the hearing of the people, The table of the Lord is contemptible" (Mal 1:7), and again (Mal 1:12), "You say, The table of the Lord is polluted; it is to be no more regarded than any other table." Either the table in the temple, on which the show-bread was placed, is that which they reflect upon (not understanding the mystery of it, they despised it as an insignificant thing), or rather the altar of burnt-offerings is here called the table, for there God, and his priests, and his people, did, as it were, feast together upon the sacrifices, in token of friendship. This they thought was contemptible. Formerly, in the days of superstition, it was thought contemptible in comparison with the idolatrous alters that the heathen had, and was set aside to make room for a new-fashioned one (Kg2 16:14, Kg2 16:15); now it is thought contemptible in comparison with their own tables, and those of their great men: The fruit thereof, even his meat, is contemptible. Those who served at the altar were to live upon the altar; but they complained that they lived poorly and meanly, and that it was not worth while to attend the service of the altar for the fruit and meat of it, for it was very ordinary and always the same again; they had no dainties, no varieties, no nice dishes. Nay, that part of the sacrifices which was given to God, the blood and the fat, they looked upon with contempt, as not worthy the multitude of laws God had made about it; they asked, "What need is there of so much ado about burning the fat and pouring out the blood?" Note, Those greatly profane and pollute God's name who despise the business of religion, though it is very honourable, as not worth taking pains in, and the advantages of religion, though highly valuable, as not worth taking pains for. Those who live in a careless neglect of holy ordinances, who come to them and attend on them irreverently, and go away from them never the better and under no concern, do in effect say, "The table of the Lord is contemptible; there is neither virtue nor value in it, neither credit nor comfort from it."

(2.)They despised God's name in what they did, which was of a piece with what they said, and flowed from it; corrupt principles and notions are roots of bitterness, which bear the gall and wormwood of corrupt practices. They looked upon the table and altar of the Lord as contemptible, and then, [1.] They thought any thing would serve for a sacrifice, though ever so coarse and mean, and were so far from bringing the best, as they ought to have done, that they picked out the worst they had, which was fit neither for the market nor for their own tables, and offered that at God's altar. With every sacrifice they were to bring a meat-offering of fine flour mingled with oil; but they brought polluted bread (Mal 1:7), coarse bread, servants' bread, perhaps it was dry and mouldy, or made of the refuse of the wheat, which they thought good enough to be burnt upon the altar; for had it been better they would have said, To what purpose is this waste? And as to the beasts they offered, though the law was express that what was offered in sacrifice should not have a blemish, yet they brought the blind, and the lame, and the sick (Mal 1:8), and again (Mal 1:13), the torn, and the lame, and the sick, that was ready to die of itself. They looked no further than the burning of the sacrifice, and they pleaded that it was a pity to burn it if it was good for any thing else. The people were so far convinced of their duty that they would bring sacrifices; they durst not wholly omit the duty, but they brought vain oblations, mocked God, and deceived themselves, by bringing the worst they had; and the priests, who should have taught them better, accepted the gifts brought to the altar and offered them up there, because, if they should refuse them, the people would bring none at all, and then they would lose their perquisites; and therefore, having more regard to their own profit than to God's honour, they accepted that which they knew he would not accept. Some make Mal 1:8 to be a continuation of what the priests profanely said Mal 1:7, You say to the people, If you offer the blind for sacrifice, it is not evil; or the lame and the sick, it is not evil. Note, It is a very evil thing, whether men think so or no, to offer the blind and the lame, the torn and the sick, in sacrifice to God. If we worship God ignorantly, and without understanding, we bring the blind for sacrifice; if we do it carelessly, and without consideration, if we are cold, and dull, and dead, in it, we bring the sick; if we rest in the bodily exercise, and do not make heart-work of it, we bring the lame; and, if we suffer vain thoughts and distractions to lodge within us, we bring the torn. And is not this evil? Is it not a great affront to God and a great wrong and injury to our own souls? Do not our books tell us, nay, do not our own hearts tell us, that this is evil? for God, who is the best, ought to be served with the best we have. [2.] They would do no more of their work than what they were paid for. The priests would offer the sacrifices that were brought to the altar, because they had their share of them; but as for any other service of the temple, that had not a particular fee belonging to it, they would not stir a step, nor lend a hand, to it; and this was the general temper of them, Mal 1:10. There is not a man among the priests that would shut the doors, or kindle a fire, for nought. If he were required to do the smallest piece of service, he would ask, how shall I be paid for it? They would do nothing gratis, but were all for what they could get, every one for his gain, from his quarter, Isa 56:11. Note, Though God has given order that his servants be well paid in this world, yet those are no acceptable servants to him who are mercenary, and would never do the work but for the wages. [3.] Their work was a perfect drudgery to them (Mal 1:13): You said also, Behold, what a weariness is it! Both priests and people were of this mind, that they thought God imposed too hard a task upon them; the people grudged the charge of providing the sacrifice and the priests grudged the pains of offering it; they thought the feasts of the Lord came too thick, and they were forced to attend too often, and too long, in the courts of the Lord; the priests thought it a severe penance imposed upon them to purify themselves as was required when they attended the altar and ate of the holy things; they thought the duty of their office toilsome and troublesome, and snuffed at it as unreasonable, and bearing hard upon them; they did it, but it was grudgingly and with reluctance. God speaks of it, in justification of his law, that he had not made them to serve with an offering, nor wearied them with incense, Isa 43:23. Wherein have I wearied thee? Mic 6:3. But their own wicked hearts made it a weariness; and they were, as Doeg, detained before the Lord; they would rather have been any where else. Note, Those are highly injurious, both to God and themselves, who are weary of his service and worship, and snuff at it.

III. Observe how God expostulates and reasons the case with them, for their conviction and humiliation. 1. Would they, durst they, affront an earthly prince thus? "You offer to God the lame and the sick; offer it now unto thy governor (Mal 1:8), either as tribute or as a present, when thou art entreating his favour, or in gratitude for some favour received; will he be pleased with thee? Or, rather, will he not take himself to be affronted by it?" Note, Those who are careless and irreverent in the duties of religious worship should consider what a shame it is to offer that to their God which they would scorn to offer to their governor, to be more observant of the laws of breeding and good manners than of the laws of religion, and more afraid of being rude than of being profane. 2. Could they imagine that such sacrifices as these would be pleasing to God, or answer the end of sacrifices? "Should I accept this at your hand, saith the Lord? Mal 1:13. Have you any reason to think I should either not discern or not resent the affront, that I should connive at the violation of my own laws? No (Mal 1:10); I have no pleasure in you, and therefore, I will not accept an offering, such an offering, at your hand." If God has no pleasure in the person, if the person be not in a justified state, if he be not sanctified, God will not accept the offering. God had respect to Abel first and then to his sacrifice. Note, In order to our acceptance with God it is not enough to do that which, for the matter of it, is good, but we must do it from a right principle, in a right manner, and for a right end. It was the ancient rule laid down (Gen 4:7), If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? Now, if we be not accepted of God, in vain do we worship him; it is all lost labour; nay, we are all undone, for ever undone, if we come short of God's acceptance. Those therefore make a bad bargain for themselves who, to save charges in their religion, miss all the ends of it, and, by thinking to go the nearest way to work, bring nothing to pass. Those who make it the top of their ambition, as we all ought to do, whether present or absent, to be accepted of the Lord, will not dare to bring the torn, and the lame, and the sick, for sacrifice. 3. How could they expect to prevail with God in their intercessions for the people when they thus affronted God in their sacrifices? So some understand Mal 1:9, as spoken ironically, "And now if you will do the duty of priests, and stand in the gap to turn away the judgments of God that you see ready to pour in upon us, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us, and to our land which is almost eaten up with locusts and caterpillars," as appears Mal 3:11. "Try now what interest you have at the throne of grace; improve it for the removing of this plague, for it has been by your means; you have provoked God to send it. But as you go on thus to profane his sacred things will he regard your persons or your prayers? No, you cannot prevail with him to command it away." For, if we regard iniquity in our hearts, God will not hear us, either for ourselves or for others. 4. Had God deserved this at their hands? No, he had provided comfortably for them, and had given them such encouragement in their work as might have engaged them to do it cheerfully and well; so some understand Mal 1:10, "Who is there among you that shall shut a door, or kindle a fire, for nought? No, God does not expect you should serve him for nothing; you are well paid for it, and shall be so; not a cup of cold water, given for the honour of God, shall lose its reward." Note, The consideration of our constant receivings from God, and the present rewards of obedience in obedience, very much aggravates our slothfulness and niggardliness in our returns of duty to God.

IV. He calls them to repentance for their profanations of his holy name. So we may understand Mal 1:9, "Now, I pray you, beseech God that he will be gracious to us. Humble yourselves for your sin, cry mightily to God for pardon, and make up in the faith and fervency of your prayers what has been wanting in the worth and value of your sacrifices; for all the rebukes of Providence we are under are by your means." Note, Those who have by their sins helped to kindle a fire are highly concerned by their repentance, prayers, and the personal reformation, to help to quench it. We must see how much God's judgments are by our means, and be awakened thereby to be earnest with him to return in mercy; and, if we take not this course, how can we think he should regard our persons?

V. He declares his resolution both to secure the glory of his own name and to reckon with those who profane it. Those who put contempt upon God and religion, and think to run down sacred things, let them know,

1.That they shall not gain their point. God will magnify his law and make it honourable, though they vilify it and make it contemptible; for (Mal 1:11) from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same my name shall be great among the Gentiles. It might be said, "If these are not the worshippers whom God will accept, then he has no worshippers." As if he must make the best of their service, or else he would have no service done him; and then what will he do for his great name? But let him alone for that; though Israel be not faithful, be not gathered, yet God will be glorious. Though these priests provoke him to take down the ceremonial economy, and to abolish that law of commandments, which could not make the comers thereunto perfect, yet he will be no loser by that, at the long run; for, (1.) Instead of those carnal ordinances, which they profaned, a spiritual way of worship shall be introduced and established: Incense shall be offered to God's name (which signifies prayer and praise, Psa 141:2; Rev 8:3), instead of the blood and fat of bulls and goats. And it shall be a pure offering, refined, not only from the corruptions that were in the priests' practice, but from the mere bodily exercise that was in the institutions themselves, which are called carnal ordinances, imposed till the time of reformation, Heb 9:10. When the hour came in which the true worshippers worshipped the Father in spirit and in truth, then this incense was offered, even this pure offering. (2.) Instead of his being worshipped and served among the Jews only, a small people in a corner of the world, he will be served and worshipped in all places, from the rising of the sun to the going down of the same; in every place, in every part of the world, incense shall be offered to his name; nations shall be discipled, and shall speak of the wonderful works of God, and have them spoken to them in their own language. This is a plain prediction of that great revolution in the kingdom of grace by which the Gentiles, who had been strangers and foreigners, came to be fellow-citizens with the saints and of the household of God, and as welcome to the throne of grace as ever the Jews had been. It is twice said (for the thing was certain), My name shall be great among the Gentiles, whereas hitherto in Judah only he was known, and his name was great, Psa 76:1. God's name shall be declared to them, the declaration of it shall be received and believed, and there shall be those among the Gentiles who shall magnify and glorify the name of God better than ever the Jews had done, even the priests themselves.

2.That they shall not go unpunished, Mal 1:14. Here is the doom of those who do like these priests, for the sentence on them is a sentence on all such. Observe, (1.) The description of profane and careless worshippers. They are such as vow and sacrifice to the Lord a corrupt thing when they have in their flock a male. They have of the best, wherewith to serve and honour him, so bountiful has be been in his gifts to them, but they put him off with the worst, and think that good enough for him, so ungrateful are they in their returns to him. This was the fault of the people, but the priests connived at it, and indulged them in it. We find a distinction in the law which allowed that to be offered for a free-will offering which would not be accepted for a vow, Lev 22:23. But the priests would accept it, though God would not, pretending to be more indulgent than he was, for which he will give them no thanks another day. (2.) The character given of such worshippers. They are deceivers; they deal falsely and fraudulently with God; they play the hypocrite with him; they pretend to honour him, in making the vow, but, when it comes to be performed, they put an affront upon him, to such a degree that it would have been better not to have vowed than to vow and thus to pay; but let not such be themselves deceived, for God is not mocked. Those who think to put a cheat upon God will prove, in the end, to have put a damning cheat upon their own souls. Hypocrites are deceivers, and they will prove self-deceivers, and so self-destroyers. (3.) The doom passed upon them: They are cursed; they expect a blessing, but will meet with a curse, the tokens of God's wrath, according to the judgment written. (4.) The reason of this doom: "For I am a great King, saith the Lord of hosts, and therefore will reckon with those who deal with me but as a man like themselves; my name is dreadful among the heathen, and therefore I will not bear that it should be contemptible among my own people." The heathen paid more respect to their gods, though idols, than the Jews did to theirs, though the only true and living God. Note, The consideration of God's universal dominion, and the universal acknowledgment of it, should restrain us from all irreverence in his service.

Matthew Henry (1662–1714) — Commentary on the Whole Bible. This section covers verses 6–14. Public domain.
Copy as
JeromeAD 420
Commentary on Malachi
(V. 9) And now beseech the face of God that he may have mercy on you: for by your hand has this been done, if in any way he may accept your faces, says the Lord of hosts. Who is among you that shut the doors, and kindle my altar to no purpose? LXX: And now beseech the face of your God, and pray to him: these things have been done by your hands, if I may accept your faces, says the Lord Almighty: because even among you the doors shall be closed, and my altar shall not be kindled for nothing. In this place, the Seventy interpreters differ greatly from the Hebrew truth: and where the interpretation is different, it is necessary that the meaning also be different. Because you have offered blind, lame, and weak victims, for you have done all these things that I have said: repent, if in any way God will have mercy on you, for there is no one among you to the very end, not even a high priest, not a priest, not even a Levite, not a singer, and not even a doorkeeper, and the one who sets fire on the altar for burning sacrifices, who should not receive payment for his work from me. However, when he says this, he means tithes of all the crops that are offered by the people. By this, it is shown that servitude to the Lord is more acceptable, which does not demand a reward in the present. Hence the Apostle preaches the Gospel for free (1 Thess. 2); and he works with his hands night and day, so as not to be a burden to anyone, and he testifies that this glory of his free preaching to the Gentiles should by no means be diminished (2 Thess. 3). Furthermore, LXX others suggest a much different meaning: O priests, who offer weak sacrifices, turn to repentance, and seek the face of the Lord and pray for the works of your hands. But what it brings forth: If I 951 take your faces, I do not know if it agrees with the exhortation of repentance. For no one says, pray to me, and I will not spare you. It follows: In you the doors will be closed, namely, those of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Where the Savior says: I am the door (John 10:9). Or in other words: The doors of the Scriptures will not be opened to you, nor will you be able to understand the holy of holies or know the sacraments of the Lord; nor will you be able to offer incense on his altar, because your prayers will not reach him. And what is said to be given freely, we interpret as meaning without reward: those who follow this understanding that we now explain turn it into a favor, so that they do not have the grace to serve at the Lord's altar.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Malachi 1:9 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.