Leviticus 17:16
“Purity Laws for Eating Carrion”Leviticus 17:15–16
Bible text: King James Version (1769 Blayney text) · Public domain
Bible text: Berean Standard Bible · Public domain
Bible text: American Standard Version (1901) · Public domain
Bible text: World English Bible, Messianic edition · Public domain
Bible text: Geneva Bible (1599) · Public domain
Bible text: Young's Literal Translation · Public domain
- וְאִםve·'Imand ifH518Conj-w ¦ PrtParticle Conditionalוְandאִםif
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- יְכַבֵּסye·kha·Beshe will washH3526V-Piel-Imperf-3msVerb Piel Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- וּבְשָׂרוֹu·ve·sa·Roand his bodyH1320Conj-w ¦ N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixוּandבְשָׂרbodyוֹhis
- לֹאlo'notH3808NegParticle Negative
- יִרְחָץyir·Chatzhe will washH7364V-Qal-Imperf-3msVerb Qal Imperfect 3rd Singular Masculine
- וְנָשָׂאve·na·Sa'and he will bearH5375Conj-w ¦ V-Qal-ConsecPerf-3msVerb Qal Consecutive Perfect 3rd Singular Masculineוְandנָשָׂאhe will bear
- עֲוֹנוֹa·vo·Nohis iniquityH5771N-msc ¦ 3msNoun Singular Masculine Construct with suffixעֲוֹנiniquityוֹhis
English is a literal word-by-word gloss of the Hebrew, not the KJV's wording. Why?
This is the original text the KJV's translators worked from — each Hebrew word with its own literal English meaning in this verse, prepared by scholars at Tyndale House, Cambridge. The KJV translates whole sentences, not word by word, so its wording differs: one Hebrew word can become several English words, and the KJV may choose “the LORD” where the gloss reads “Yahweh”. Both are faithful — they answer different questions. For the KJV's own rendering, switch to the KJV text.
Words in [ ] are added by the English.
Details
Study this verse
Public-domain commentary
Matthew Henry
From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry wrote on whole passages, and this entry covers Leviticus 17:10–16. He set out his notes in a two-level outline, kept here as he numbered it.
We have here, I. A repetition and confirmation of the law against eating blood. We have met with this prohibition twice before in the levitical law (Leviticus 3:17; Leviticus 7:26), besides the place it had in the precepts of Noah, Genesis 9:4. But here, 1. The prohibition is repeated again and again, and reference had to the former laws to this purport (Leviticus 17:12): I said to the children of Israel, No soul of you shall eat blood; and again (Leviticus 17:14), You shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh. A great stress is laid upon it, as a law which has more in it than at first view one would think. 2. It is made binding, not only on the house of Israel, but on the strangers that sojourned among them (Leviticus 17:10), which perhaps was one reason why it was thought advisable, for a time, to forbid blood to the Gentile converts, Acts 15:29. 3. The penalty annexed to this law is very severe (Leviticus 17:10): I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, if he do it presumptuously, and will cut him off; and again (Leviticus 17:14), He shall be cut off. Note, God's wrath will be the sinner's ruin. Write that man undone, for ever undone, against whom God sets his face; for what creature is able to confront the Creator? 4. A reason is given for this law (Leviticus 17:11): because it is the blood that makes atonement for the soul; and therefore it was appointed to make atonement with, because the life of the flesh is the blood. The sinner deserved to die; therefore the sacrifice must die. Now, the blood being so the life that ordinarily beasts were killed for man's use by the drawing out of all their blood, God appointed the sprinkling or pouring out of the blood of the sacrifice upon the altar to signify that the life of the sacrifice was given to God instead of the sinner's life, and as a ransom or counter-price for it; therefore without shedding of blood there was no remission, Hebrews 9:22. For this reason they must eat no blood, and, (1.) It was then a very good reason; for God would by this means preserve the honour of that way of atonement which he had instituted, and keep up in the minds of the people a reverent regard to it. The blood of the covenant being then a sensible object, no blood must be either eaten or trodden under foot as a common thing, as they must have no ointment nor perfume like that which God ordered them to make for himself. But, (2.) This reason is now superseded, which intimates that the law itself was ceremonial, and is now no longer in force: the blood of Christ who has come (and we are to look for no other) is that alone which makes atonement for the soul, and of which the blood of the sacrifices was an imperfect type: the coming of the substance supersedes the shadow. The blood of beasts is no longer the ransom, but Christ's blood only; and therefore there is not now that reason for abstaining from blood which there was then, and we cannot suppose it was the will of God that the law should survive the reason of it. The blood, provided it be so prepared as not to be unwholesome, is now allowed for the nourishment of our bodies, because it is no longer appointed to make an atonement for the soul. (3.) Yet it has still useful significancy. The life is in the blood; it is the vehicle of the animal spirits, and God would have his people to regard the life even of their beasts, and not to be cruel and hard-hearted, not to take delight in any thing that is barbarous. They must not be a blood-thirsty people. The blood then made atonement figuratively, now the blood of Christ makes atonement really and effectually; to this therefore we must have a reverent regard, and not use it as a common thing, for he will set his face against those that do so, and they shall be cut off, Hebrews 10:29.
II.Some other precepts are here given as appendages to this law, and hedges about it,
1.They must cover the blood of that which they took in hunting, Leviticus 17:13. They must not only not eat it, but must give it a decent burial, in token of some mystery which they must believe lay hidden in this constitution. the Jews look upon this as a very weighty precept and appoint that the blood should be covered with these words, Blessed be he that hath sanctified us by his precepts, and commanded us to cover blood.
2.They must not eat that which died of itself or was torn of beasts (Leviticus 17:15), for the blood was either not at all, or not regularly, drawn out of them. God would have them to be curious in their diet, not with the curiosity that gratifies the sensual appetite, but with that which checks and restrains it. God would not have his children to eat every thing that came in their way with greediness, but to consider diligently what was before them, that they might learn in other things to ask questions for conscience' sake. Those that flew upon the spoiled sinned, 1 Samuel 14:32, 1 Samuel 14:33. If a man did, through ignorance or inconsideration, eat the flesh of any beast not duly slain, he must wash himself and his clothes, else he bore his iniquity, Leviticus 17:15, Leviticus 17:16. The pollution was ceremonial, so was the purification from it; but if a man slighted the prescribed method of cleansing, or would not submit, he thereby contracted moral guilt. See the nature of a remedial law: he that obeys it has the benefit of it; he that does not, not only remains under his former guilt, but adds to that guilt of contemning the provisions made by divine grace for his relief, and sins against the remedy.
Continue studying Leviticus 17:16 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.
Read & Compare
- BibleGatewayThis verse in more than 200 translations and 70 languages.
- Bible.comThe YouVersion reader — hundreds of translations, reading plans, and highlights.
- ESV.orgCrossway's official English Standard Version reader.
- NET BibleThe NET translation with 60,000+ translators' notes on every rendering decision.
- STEP BibleTyndale House's free study tool — original text, vocabulary, and scholarly resources.
- BibliaLogos Bible Software's free web reader.
- USCCBThe New American Bible (Revised Edition) with the U.S. bishops' study notes.
Commentaries
- BibleHub CommentariesDozens of classic commentaries on this verse, gathered on one page.
- StudyLightMore than 100 commentary sets — the largest collection on the web.
- BibleRefPlain-English commentary on what this verse means, verse by verse.
- Enduring WordDavid Guzik's free commentary on this chapter, widely used by Bible teachers.
- Bible Study ToolsVerse commentary alongside Greek and Hebrew study aids.
Original Language & Research
- BibleHub InterlinearThe verse word by word — original language, transliteration, and English.
- BibleHub LexiconEvery word's original-language definition and Strong's entry.
- Blue Letter BibleDeep-study tools — Strong's numbers, concordance, and word studies.
- SefariaThe Hebrew text with Rashi and centuries of Jewish commentary.
Sermons, Hymns & Audio
TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.
Written with AI assistance. Always check it against Scripture.
This verse
The one who will not wash his clothes or bathe after eating such meat stays unclean and answers to God for it, because he shall bear his iniquity.
“But if he wash them not,”
“Them” are the clothes of verse 15, left unwashed.
“nor bathe his flesh;”
The second part of the remedy, the bathing of the body, is refused as well.
“then he shall bear his iniquity.”
nâsâʼ (to carry) with ʻâvôn (iniquity, and the guilt and penalty it brings). He stays unclean and carries the guilt of it before God, in contrast with the Servant who bears the iniquities of others (Isaiah 53:11).
Passage studyLeviticus 17:15–16
Unclean Until Evening, Then Clean
Summary
Leviticus 17 closes with a law about meat from an animal that died of itself or was torn by wild beasts. Anyone who ate it, whether born in Israel or a stranger living there, was to wash his clothes, bathe in water, and stay unclean until evening, and then he was clean. The one who refused the washing would bear his iniquity. In two verses God guards the honour of blood and life, holds everyone among his people to one standard, and gives a short and gracious way back to cleanness, a way that points ahead to the cleansing we have in Christ.
Why eating what died of itself made a person unclean
This law follows directly on the chapter’s teaching about blood. Leviticus 17:10–14 forbids eating blood, says that the life of the flesh is in the blood, and tells the hunter to pour out the blood of the game he catches. Verse 15 carries the same concern from the altar to the ordinary table, to meat that was never offered in sacrifice at all.
Two kinds of meat are named. “That which died of itself” translates nᵉbêlâh, a carcass, an animal that died naturally and was never slaughtered. “That which was torn with beasts” is ṭᵉrêphâh, an animal mangled or killed by wild animals. Both died without the slaughter that drained the blood from clean meat, so their flesh still held the blood, and whoever ate it ate the life God had claimed for himself.
God gives the reason for this care a few verses earlier: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul” (Leviticus 17:11). Life belongs to God, and blood was the means he appointed for covering sin on the altar. Eating meat with its blood still in it treated lightly what God had set apart for atonement, and so it made the eater unclean.
The word for unclean, ṭâmêʼ, means to be or become unclean or defiled, and it is also used of a priest pronouncing someone unclean. Here it names the state the eater falls into until the evening.
Keeping away from such meat had practical benefits in a hot land, where flesh soon decays, but the reason the law itself gives is holiness. Israel belonged to the LORD and was to live as his people, apart from the nations around them, who had no such laws about blood and carrion. Over all the laws of clean and unclean food God sets his own call, “ye shall therefore be holy, for I am holy” (Leviticus 11:44–45). Deuteronomy repeats the ban on eating what dies of itself (Deuteronomy 14:21). Centuries later, when Ezekiel was told to eat defiled bread, he pleaded with the Lord that from his youth he had never eaten what died of itself or was torn in pieces (Ezekiel 4:14).
One law for the Israelite and the stranger
“Every soul” (nephesh) means every person, and the verse spells out who that includes: “whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger.” The first is the native-born Israelite and the second is the foreigner who had come to live among them. God holds both to the same standard of purity, because both dwell among the people where he has set his presence, and so the whole community is one holy people under his law. The Passover law speaks the same way: “One law shall be to him that is homeborn, and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you” (Exodus 12:48–49).
Washing, bathing and waiting for evening
The remedy has three parts. The eater must “wash his clothes”, “bathe himself in water”, and “be unclean until the even”. The verb for washing clothes, kâbaç, means to wash, and Strong’s and BDB describe the way it was done, by treading the cloth underfoot, as a fuller cleaned garments. The verb for bathing, râchats, means to wash or bathe, the whole body or part of it, usually with water. So both his garments and his body are washed. These were the standard acts by which the law of Moses removed ritual defilement.
Then he waits. The uncleanness lasts until the evening, and with the close of the day the verse declares, “then shall he be clean.” God fixes both the remedy and its end. The person who ate such meat, even without meaning to, had a clear way back, and by evening he could take his full place again in the worship and life of the community. Such a law keeps before Israel how holy the God among them is, and it shows just as plainly that he provides the cleansing he requires.
What it means to bear his iniquity
Verse 16 gives the other path: “But if he wash them not, nor bathe his flesh; then he shall bear his iniquity.” The “them” are the clothes of verse 15, and the flesh is his body.
To “bear” is nâsâʼ, a verb with a very wide range that means to lift or carry. In this phrase it is the carrying of a burden, the responsibility for an act and its consequences. “Iniquity” is ʻâvôn, which means fault or iniquity and also the guilt and punishment that belong to it. Together the words say that the man who refuses the washing stays in his defiled state, and he carries the guilt and penalty of it himself, with nothing done to remove it.
In daily life this meant that he stayed unclean. An unclean person was kept from the tabernacle and from sharing in the worship and sacrifices of the people, and he could be kept apart from others in the camp so that his uncleanness did not spread to them or to holy things. The verse names no death penalty. Its weight lies in a person cut off from the sacred life of Israel and answerable to God for his state.
The uncleanness of verse 15 came from eating, and it was a ritual barrier to holy things. The guilt of verse 16 comes from refusing the washing God had given. A defilement left alone becomes a disobedience, and the law treats even a neglected ritual as a serious matter before God. The law for one who touches a dead body follows the same pattern of uncleanness and required cleansing (Numbers 19:11–13), and the law about presumptuous sin shows how each person answers for his own disregard of God’s word (Numbers 15:30–31).
All of this sits within a larger provision. The laws on clean and unclean animals in Leviticus 11 mark the line between what Israel may and may not eat. The Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16 shows God’s means of cleansing the whole people. Leviticus 17 as a whole teaches the sacredness of blood and life, and the chapters that follow call the whole people to holiness in daily living.
Does this law still apply to Christians?
The washing rite belongs to the ceremonial laws of the old covenant, and Christ has fulfilled it. Jesus declared all foods clean (Mark 7:19), turning the attention of his people from the purity of food to the purity of the heart. In Peter’s vision God told him, “What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common” (Acts 10:15), so what was once unclean food has been made clean.
At the Jerusalem council the apostles asked Gentile believers to abstain from things strangled and from blood (Acts 15:20). That counsel served the unity of Jewish and Gentile believers in the church and kept them from giving offence to one another, and salvation itself remained by grace.
What remains for us is what the law was teaching all along: God is holy, life is sacred to him, and his people need his cleansing. Peter carries the old command straight into the life of the church: “Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:15–16).
The one who bore our iniquity
The man who would not wash bore his own iniquity. Isaiah foretells a Servant who would carry the iniquity of others: “by his knowledge shall my righteous servant justify many; for he shall bear their iniquities” (Isaiah 53:11). Peter says the same of Jesus, “Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24). John the Baptist pointed to him as “the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world” (John 1:29).
Water and the setting sun made an Israelite clean until his next defilement. The blood of Christ purges our conscience from dead works to serve the living God (Hebrews 9:14), and “the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin” (1 John 1:7). By his offering, made once for all, we are sanctified (Hebrews 10:10), and so we may draw near to God with a true heart in full assurance of faith (Hebrews 10:22). The washing of Leviticus covered a day. The cleansing Christ gives lasts for ever.
What this law shows of God
God cares about something as ordinary as a meal. He claimed the life in every creature as his own, and he taught his people to honour it even at their tables. He held the stranger and the native to one standard, because both lived in his presence. And when a person became unclean, he named the remedy and promised its end: wash, bathe, wait until evening, “then shall he be clean.”
The warning of verse 16 is real, and it shows how seriously God takes our refusal of the cleansing he offers. Yet the same God has given his Son to bear the iniquity that we could never carry away ourselves. The law that left the unwashed man with his own guilt points us to the one who took our guilt on himself, and in him we are clean.
Leviticus 17:15
“And every soul that eateth”
“Soul” is nephesh, here meaning any person at all. The act that defiles is eating.
“that which died of itself, or that which was torn with beasts,”
The carcass of an animal that died naturally (nᵉbêlâh) and an animal killed by wild beasts (ṭᵉrêphâh). Neither was slaughtered so as to drain its blood.
“whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger,”
The native-born Israelite and the resident foreigner are bound alike.
“he shall both wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water,”
Two acts of cleansing, kâbaç for the garments and râchats for the body.
“and be unclean until the even:”
The state of being unclean (ṭâmêʼ) lasts until sunset.
“then shall he be clean.”
At the close of the day he is clean again and may return to the full life of the community.
Leviticus 17:16 This verse
“But if he wash them not,”
“Them” are the clothes of verse 15, left unwashed.
“nor bathe his flesh;”
The second part of the remedy, the bathing of the body, is refused as well.
“then he shall bear his iniquity.”
nâsâʼ (to carry) with ʻâvôn (iniquity, and the guilt and penalty it brings). He stays unclean and carries the guilt of it before God, in contrast with the Servant who bears the iniquities of others (Isaiah 53:11).
Last revised