Skip to content
“Job Demands Constructive Counsel”· Job 6:24–30
Translation
King James Version
Teach me, and I will hold my tongue: and cause me to understand wherein I have erred.
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
Teach H3384 me, and I will hold my tongue H2790: and cause me to understand H995 wherein I have erred H7686.
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
"Teach me, and I will be silent. Make me understand how I am at fault.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Teach me, and I will be silent. Help me understand how I have erred.
Ask
American Standard Version
Teach me, and I will hold my peace; And cause me to understand wherein I have erred.
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
“Teach me, and I will hold my peace. Cause me to understand wherein I have erred.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
Teach me, and I wil hold my tongue: and cause me to vnderstande, wherein I haue erred.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
Shew me, and I--I keep silent, And what I have erred, let me understand.
Ask
See on the biblical-era map
In the KJVVerse 13,003 of 31,102 · 41.8%

Study This Verse

Summary

Job 6:24 encapsulates a profound and challenging plea from Job, who, amidst his overwhelming suffering and the simplistic accusations of his friends, expresses a desperate desire for genuine instruction and understanding. He is not stubbornly defiant but earnestly seeks clarity, inviting his accusers to demonstrate precisely where he has erred, promising to silence himself if true understanding and verifiable evidence are provided. This verse powerfully highlights Job's deep longing for truth, justice, and a reasoned explanation for his inexplicable pain in the face of his companions' unhelpful and condemning counsel, revealing his integrity and his commitment to intellectual honesty.

Context

Literary Context

This verse is a pivotal moment within Job's first extensive response (chapters 6-7) to Eliphaz the Temanite. Eliphaz, in his preceding speech (chapters 4-5), had articulated a classic, albeit rigid, form of retribution theology, implying that Job's immense suffering must be a direct consequence of his sin, as God, in their view, only punishes the wicked (Job 4:7-9). Job, who has consistently maintained his innocence regarding any great transgression, is overwhelmed by the sheer magnitude of his physical and emotional anguish, which he vividly describes in his earlier lament (Job 6:2-3). His plea in Job 6:24 marks a significant shift from lament to a direct, almost legalistic challenge, demanding concrete evidence and specific understanding rather than vague accusations. This challenge exposes the inadequacy and cruelty of his friends' "comfort," setting the stage for the escalating theological debate throughout the book.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Book of Job is situated within the broader genre of ancient Near Eastern wisdom literature, which frequently grappled with complex questions surrounding suffering, divine justice, and human wisdom. In this cultural milieu, the prevailing belief was a strict form of retributive justice: righteousness was believed to lead to prosperity and blessing, while wickedness invariably led to calamity and divine punishment. When an individual experienced profound affliction, it was almost universally assumed to be a direct consequence of unconfessed sin. Friends and counselors were therefore expected to help the afflicted discern their sin and encourage confession to restore divine favor. Job's steadfast refusal to confess a specific sin, coupled with his demand for a precise explanation, directly confronts and subverts this deeply ingrained cultural and theological framework. His plea for understanding also reflects the social dynamics of a disputation, where one party challenges the other to provide verifiable evidence for their claims, highlighting the intellectual and moral stakes of the dialogue.

Key Themes

Job 6:24 powerfully contributes to several central themes woven throughout the book. Firstly, it underscores Job's profound desire for truth and instruction. He is not stubbornly closed off to correction but demands that any teaching be based on verifiable truth, not mere assumption or abstract theological propositions. Secondly, it highlights his desperate plea for understanding; it is insufficient for Job to merely be told he has erred—he yearns for clarity on wherein his error lies, reflecting his longing for justice amidst inexplicable pain and the limitations of human wisdom in discerning divine ways (Job 28). Thirdly, his statement, "Teach me, and I will hold my tongue," demonstrates a remarkable conditional humility, signifying a willingness to be silent and accept rebuke if his fault can be clearly and logically demonstrated, contrasting sharply with the unproven assertions of his friends. Finally, the verse poignantly illustrates the burden of false accusation, a central theme in Job's narrative, as he endures the pain of being condemned without specific justification, a universal human experience that resonates with the suffering of the innocent.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

Teach yârâh' H3384

From the Hiphil stem of H3384 (yârâh), this word means "to instruct," "to teach," "to point out," or "to show the way." It implies a desire for clear, authoritative, and directional guidance, not just general accusations or abstract theological propositions. Job is demanding specific, verifiable information that would "point out" his error, much like one points out a path or directs an arrow. It signifies a request for concrete, actionable knowledge rather than vague condemnation.

Erred shâgâh' H7686

Derived from H7686 (shâgâh), meaning "to stray," "to make a mistake," or "to err." Crucially, this term often refers to an unintentional error, an oversight, or a going astray, rather than a deliberate, rebellious, or presumptuous sin. This nuance is vital for understanding Job's stance; he is not admitting to conscious rebellion against God but is open to the possibility that he might have inadvertently gone wrong or misunderstood something, thereby challenging his friends to specify such an unintentional transgression. It highlights his desire to understand any unwitting fault.

Verse Breakdown

"Teach me"

This is Job's direct, impassioned challenge and invitation to his friends. It indicates that he is not entirely closed off to the idea of having made a mistake. Rather than stubbornly refusing correction, he is demanding concrete, specific instruction and evidence from those who claim to possess divine insight into his situation. It signifies an openness to truth, even if that truth might implicate him, provided it is presented with clarity and substantiation.

"and I will hold my tongue"

This clause reveals Job's conditional promise of silence and submission. The Hebrew word for "hold my tongue" (chârash, H2790) implies being silent or deaf. If his friends can genuinely instruct him, provide clear evidence, and prove his error, he pledges to cease his protests, lamentations, and self-justifications. This highlights his integrity and his profound desire for a just and truthful resolution to his inexplicable suffering. It also underscores the weight of his current words, which he is willing to retract if proven wrong by undeniable truth.

"and cause me to understand wherein I have erred"

This is the core of Job's demand and the most critical part of his plea. He doesn't merely want to be told he is wrong or that his suffering is due to sin; he wants the precise nature, specific instance, and verifiable evidence of his error to be laid bare. The Hebrew word for "understand" (bîyn, H995) implies mental separation, discernment, and comprehension. It is a plea for clarity, justice, and verifiable truth in the face of abstract accusations and the simplistic, unproven theological framework offered by his friends. He desires intellectual and spiritual vindication or, failing that, specific, demonstrable correction.

Literary Devices

Job 6:24 employs several powerful literary devices that amplify its impact. It functions as a Rhetorical Challenge, where Job's statement, though phrased as a request, implicitly questions the wisdom and the validity of his friends' accusations. He is, in essence, daring them to provide the evidence they claim to possess, thereby exposing the emptiness of their counsel. The verse also utilizes a clear Conditional Clause ("Teach me, and I will hold my tongue"), which emphasizes Job's readiness to submit to truth if it is presented, thereby highlighting the stark contrast between his integrity and his friends' unsubstantiated assertions. Furthermore, there is a profound element of Irony at play: the suffering Job, who is the one truly seeking understanding and demonstrating intellectual honesty, is appealing for genuine wisdom from those who claim to be wise but are offering only platitudes and false accusations, ultimately revealing their spiritual and intellectual bankruptcy.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Job's earnest plea for understanding in the face of unmerited suffering resonates deeply with the broader biblical narrative concerning divine justice, the human experience of pain, and the pursuit of truth. His demand challenges the simplistic retribution theology prevalent in his day and throughout history, forcing a deeper theological inquiry into the complexities of God's sovereignty and the multifaceted purposes of suffering beyond immediate sin. Job's desire to understand "wherein I have erred" reflects a universal human longing for meaning and justice when confronted with inexplicable hardship, pushing the boundaries of conventional wisdom and anticipating a more nuanced understanding of God's ways. His openness to correction, coupled with his demand for clarity, exemplifies a humble yet persistent pursuit of truth, even when it might expose personal fault, laying groundwork for a mature faith that grapples with divine mystery and acknowledges the limits of human comprehension.

Reflection and Application

Job 6:24 offers profound lessons for how we navigate suffering, accusation, and the pursuit of truth in our own lives and interactions. When faced with difficulties or accusations, Job's example encourages us to cultivate a spirit of genuine openness to correction, yet also to insist on specific, clear understanding of where we might have gone wrong. This requires both humility to admit potential fault and courage to demand verifiable truth, rather than accepting vague condemnations or unsubstantiated judgments. For those offering counsel or correction, this verse serves as a powerful reminder: instead of vague accusations or simplistic solutions, we are called to provide clear, actionable insights, rooted in truth, empathy, and compassion. Condemnation without explanation is rarely helpful and often deeply harmful, as Job's experience vividly illustrates. Job's promise to "hold his tongue" if taught underscores the vital importance of active listening and a willingness to be silent and learn when presented with genuine wisdom, reminding us that true discernment often begins with quiet attention rather than hasty pronouncements or dogmatic assertions.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How do I typically respond when I am accused or misunderstood? Do I seek genuine understanding and specific feedback, or do I tend to become defensive or dismissive?
  2. When offering counsel or correction to others, especially those in distress, am I quick to judge or to offer simplistic solutions, or do I strive to understand their specific situation and offer compassionate, clear, and constructive guidance?
  3. What does Job's willingness to "hold his tongue" if taught teach me about humility, integrity, and the pursuit of truth in difficult conversations and relationships?

FAQ

Is Job 6:24 an admission of guilt from Job?

No, Job 6:24 is not an admission of guilt in the sense that Job is confessing to a specific, deliberate sin that caused his suffering. Instead, it is a direct challenge and an earnest invitation to his friends. Job is essentially saying, "If you truly believe I have erred, then show me precisely what that error is, and provide the evidence." The Hebrew word for "erred" (shagiti) often refers to an unintentional mistake or going astray, rather than a deliberate rebellion against God. Job maintains his integrity and his claim of innocence regarding any great transgression, while simultaneously demonstrating an openness to correction if a valid, specific case can be made against him. This plea underscores his profound desire for justice and truth, rather than a blanket admission of the specific transgressions his friends accuse him of.

What does "hold my tongue" signify in this context?

Job's promise to "hold my tongue" (or "be silent") is a powerful and conditional declaration of his willingness to cease his lamentations, arguments, and self-justifications. It signifies that if his friends can provide a clear, truthful, and specific explanation for his suffering that genuinely demonstrates his error, he will stop protesting and accept their rebuke. This highlights his integrity and his profound desire for understanding and justice, even if it means acknowledging personal fault. It is a testament to his commitment to truth and his demand for intellectual honesty from his accusers, demonstrating that his current outspokenness is not stubborn defiance but a desperate cry for clarity and vindication.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Job's desperate cry for someone to "teach me" and "cause me to understand wherein I have erred" finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Job longed for a wise and just arbiter, a mediator who could truly explain the mysteries of suffering and expose the truth of his situation. In Christ, we find the embodiment of all wisdom and truth (Colossians 2:3). He is the true teacher, the one who does not accuse falsely but reveals the truth with perfect clarity and compassion (John 14:6). While Job was innocent of the specific sins his friends accused him of, he was, like all humanity, a sinner in need of redemption. Christ, however, was truly without sin (1 Peter 2:22), yet He bore the full weight of our errors and suffered unjustly on our behalf, becoming the ultimate atoning sacrifice (Isaiah 53:5-6). He is the sympathetic high priest who understands our weaknesses and sufferings, having been tempted in every way, yet without sin (Hebrews 4:15). Job's desire for vindication and a just explanation for suffering is ultimately met in the cross, where the Lamb of God takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29), providing not just understanding but ultimate reconciliation, eternal justice, and the promise of a future where all tears are wiped away (Revelation 21:4).

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Job 6:22–30. His two-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 9 verses
Passage under commentJob 6:22–30
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points

Poor Job goes on here to upbraid his friends with their unkindness and the hard usage they gave him. He here appeals to themselves concerning several things which tended both to justify him and to condemn them. If they would but think impartially, and speak as they thought, they could not but own,

I.That, though he was necessitous, yet he was not craving, nor burdensome to his friends.

Those that are so, whose troubles serve them to beg by, are commonly less pitied than the silent poor. Job would be glad to see his friends, but he did not say, Bring unto me (Job 6:22), or, Deliver me, Job 6:23. He did not desire to put them to any expense, did not urge his friends either,

1.To make a collection for him, to set him up again in the world. Though he could plead that his losses came upon him by the hand of God and not by any fault or folly of his own, - that he was utterly ruined and impoverished, - that he had lived in good condition, and that when he had wherewithal he was charitable and ready to help those that were in distress, - that his friends were rich, and able to help him, yet he did not say, Give me of your substance. Note, A good man, when troubled himself, is afraid of being troublesome to his friends. Or,

2.To raise the country for him, to help him to recover his cattle out of the hands of the Sabeans and Chaldeans, or to make reprisals upon them: "Did I send for you to deliver me out of the hand of the mighty? No, I never expected you should either expose yourselves to any danger or put yourselves to any charge upon my account. I will rather sit down content under my affliction, and make the best of it, than sponge upon my friends." St. Paul worked with his hands, that he might not be burdensome to any. Job's not asking their help did not excuse them from offering it when he needed it and it was in the power of their hands to give it; but it much aggravated their unkindness when he desired no more from them than a good look, and a good word, and yet could not obtain them. It often happens that from man, even when we expect little, we have less, but from God, even when we expect much, we have more, Eph 3:20.

II.That, though he differed in opinion from them, yet he was not obstinate, but ready to yield to conviction, and to strike sail to truth as soon as ever it was made to appear to him that he was in an error (Job 6:24, Job 6:25): "If, instead of invidious reflections and uncharitable insinuations, you will give me plain instructions and solid arguments, which shall carry their own evidence along with them, I am ready to acknowledge my error and own myself in a fault: Teach me, and I will hold my tongue; for I have often found, with pleasure and wonder, how forcible right words are. But the method you take will never make proselytes: What doth your arguing reprove? Your hypothesis is false, your surmises are groundless, your management is weak, and your application peevish and uncharitable." Note,

1.Fair reasoning has a commanding power, and it is a wonder if men are not conquered by it; but railing and foul language are impotent and foolish, and it is no wonder if men are exasperated and hardened by them.

2.It is the undoubted character of every honest man that he is truly desirous to have his mistakes rectified, and to be made to understand wherein he has erred; and he will acknowledge that right words, when they appear to him to be so, though contrary to his former sentiments, are both forcible and acceptable.

III.That, though he had been indeed in a fault, yet they ought not to have given him such hard usage (Job 6:26, Job 6:27):

"Do you imagine, or contrive with a great deal of art" (for so the word signifies), "to reprove words, some passionate expressions of mine in this desperate condition, as if they were certain indications of reigning impiety and atheism? A little candour and charity would have served to excuse them, and to put a better construction upon them. Shall a man's spiritual state be judged of by some rash and hasty words, which a surprising trouble extorts from him? Is it fair, is it kind, is it just, to criticize in such a case? Would you yourselves be served thus?" Two things aggravated their unkind treatment of him: - 1. That they took advantage of his weakness and the helpless condition he was in: You overwhelm the fatherless, a proverbial expression, denoting that which is most barbarous and inhuman. "The fatherless cannot secure themselves from insults, which emboldens men of base and sordid spirits to insult them and trample upon them; and you do so by me." Job, being a childless father, thought himself as much exposed to injury as a fatherless child (Psa 127:5) and had reason to be offended with those who therefore triumphed over him. Let those who overwhelm and overpower such as upon any account may be looked upon as fatherless know that therein they not only put off the compassions of man, but fight against the compassions of God, who is, and will be, a Father of the fatherless and a helper of the helpless. 2. That they made a pretence of kindness: "You dig a pit for your friend; not only you are unkind to me, who am your friend, but, under colour of friendship, you ensnare me." When they came to see and sit with him he thought he might speak his mind freely to them, and that the more bitter his complaints to them were the more they would endeavour to comfort him. This made him take a greater liberty than otherwise he would have done. David, though he smothered his resentments when the wicked were before him, would probably have given vent to them if none had been by but friends, Psa 39:1. But this freedom of speech, which their professions of concern for him made him use, had exposed him to their censures, and so they might be said to dig a pit for him. Thus, when our hearts are hot within us, what is ill done we are apt to misrepresent as if done designedly.

IV.That, though he had let fall some passionate expressions, yet in the main he was in the right, and that his afflictions, though very extraordinary, did not prove him to be a hypocrite or a wicked man. His righteousness he holds fast, and will not let it go. For the evincing of it he here appeals, 1. To what they saw in him (Job 6:28): "Be content, and look upon me; what do you see in me that bespeaks me either a madman or a wicked man? Nay, look in my face, and you may discern there the indications of a patient and submissive spirit, for all this. Let the show of my countenance witness for me that, though I have cursed my day, I do not curse my God." Or rather, "Look upon my ulcers and sore boils, and by them it will be evident to you that I do not lie," that is, "that I do not complain without cause. Let your own eyes convince you that my condition is very sad, and that I do not quarrel with God by making it worse than it is." 2. To what they heard from him, Job 6:30. "You hear what I have to say: Is there iniquity in my tongue? that iniquity that you charge me with? Have I blasphemed God or renounced him? Are not my present arguings right? Do not you perceive, by what I say, that I can discern perverse things? I can discover your fallacies and mistakes, and, if I were myself in an error, I could perceive it. Whatever you think of me, I know what I say." 3. To their own second and sober thoughts (Job 6:29): "Return, I pray you, consider the thing over again without prejudice and partiality, and let not the result be iniquity, let it not be an unrighteous sentence; and you will find my righteousness is in it," that is, "I am in the right in this matter; and, though I cannot keep my temper as I should, I keep my integrity, and have not said, nor done, nor suffered, any thing which will prove me other than an honest man." A just cause desires nothing more than a just hearing, and if need be a re-hearing.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Two Centuries of Reception

2 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

2 quotes · AD 407–604
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
400500600

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

AD 407John ChrysostomPost-NiceneSourceCOMMENTARY ON JOB 6:24A
However, even in such a condition, Job does not refuse to learn. “You may say something useful. I will be silent, if you speak helpful words.” But they could not, to be sure, present evidence, but simply proceeded through conjectures. And since Job’s life was manifestly full of virtue, they supposed that it was not the ground of his punishments.
AD 604Gregory the DialogistEarly Medieval
51. It seems doubtful under the scale of what pointing this should hang, whether it be joined to what he had brought in, Did I say, or whether the sentence is spoken disjoined from the preceding, so that it is said thereby in reproach, Teach me, and I will hold my tongue, and cause me to understand wherein I have erred. Which same however agrees with either pointing, for by neither does he depart from the path of sound meaning. But since we have delivered these things in course allegorically, it remains for us to examine the words of the history in a moral sense.
52. Blessed Job had undergone the loss of his property; being given over to the strokes of evil spirits, he was suffering the smarts of their wounds; yet in loving the wise foolishness of God, he had trodden under foot the foolish wisdom of the world with inward scorn. Therefore in opposition to the rich of this world he is called poor, in opposition to the powerful he is called oppressed, in opposition to the wise he is called a fool. He answers the three, that as poor he seeks not their substance, nor as oppressed their aid against the strong, nor as a fool does he seek the lore of earthly wisdom. For in that the holy man is carried off above himself in spirit, both being poor he is not straitened by want, and being oppressed he suffers nothing, and being of free will foolish, he does not gaze with admiration at carnal wisdom. Hence it is that another poor and oppressed man saith, We are perplexed, yet not in despair, persecuted, but not forsaken we are cast down, yet perish not. [2 Cor. 4, 8. 9.] Hence it is that teaching the wisdom of a holy foolishness, he says, But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise. [1 Cor. 1, 27] And, if any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise. [3, 18] Hence making manifest both the gloriousness of oppression, and the riches of chosen poverty, he says, As dying, and behold we live; as chastened, and not killed; as sorrowful, yet alway rejoicing; as poor, yet making many rich; as having nothing, and yet possessing all things. [2 Cor. 6, 9]
53. It is well on this point to lift up the eyes of the mind, and to see in the Elect of God, who are suffering oppression without, what a fortress of strength they are masters of within. For all that is high and exalted without, in their secret view is grovelling, from the contempt they feel. For transported above themselves in the interior, they fix their mind on high, and all that they meet with in this life, they look upon as passing away far below unconnected with themselves, and so to speak, while they strive by the Spirit to become quit of the flesh, almost the very things they are undergoing, they are blind to. For in their eyes whatsoever is exalted in time, is not high. For as though set upon the summit of a high mountain, they look down upon the flats and levels of the present life, and rising above themselves in spiritual loftiness, they see made subject to themselves, within, all that swells highest without in carnal glorying; and hence they spare no Powers that are contrary to truth, but those whom they see to be uplifted by pride, they abase by the authority of the Spirit. For it is hence that Moses, coming from the wilderness, encounters the king of Egypt with authority, saying, Thus saith the Lord God of the Hebrews, How long wilt thou refuse to humble thyself before Me? let My people go, that they may serve Me: [Ex. 10, 3] and when Pharaoh, being driven hard by the plagues, said, Go ye, sacrifice to your God in this land [Ex. 8, 25]; he thereupon answered with increased authority, It is not meet so to do; for we shall sacrifice the abominations of the Egyptians to the Lord our God. It is hence that Nathan encounters the king when guilty; to whom first offering a similar instance of the transgression committed, and holding him convicted by the voice of his own sentence, he thereupon added, saying, Thou art the man, who hast done this thing. [2 Sam. 12, 7] It is hence that the Man of God, being sent to Samaria to destroy idolatry, when king Jeroboam threw frankincense upon the altar, not fearing the king, not held back by the dread of death, with undaunted spirit, put forth the authority of a free voice against the Altar, saying, O Altar, Altar, thus saith the Lord; Behold, a child shall be born to the house of David, Josiah by name, and upon thee shall he offer the priests of the high places. [1 Kings 13, 2] It is hence that when proud Ahab, being bowed down to the service of idols, ventured to upbraid Elijah, saying, Art thou the man that troubleth Israel? [1 Kings 18, 17] Elijah forthwith struck the foolishness of the king in his pride with the authoritativeness of a free rebuke, saying, I have not troubled Israel, but thou and thy fathers house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and have followed Baalim. [ver. 18] It is hence that Elisha, following his master's true loftiness, confounded for the guilt of unbelief Joram the son of Ahab, when he came to him with the king Jehoshaphat, saying, What have I to do with thee? Get thee to the prophets of thy father and to the prophets of thy mother. [2 Kings 3, 13] And, As the Lord of hosts liveth, before Whom I stand, surely were it not that I regard the presence of Jehoshaphat the king of Judah, I would not look toward thee, nor see thee. [ver. 14] Hence it is that the same man held Naaman fixed before the door of his house, when he came to him with horses and chariots, and did not meet him, set up as he was with abundance of talents and raiment; that he did not open the door of his house to him, but charged him by a messenger that he should wash seven times in the Jordan. Hence too this same Naaman was going away enraged, saying, Behold, I thought he will surely come out to me. It is hence that Peter, when the priests and elders, raging furiously even in scourging, forbade him to speak in the Name of Jesus, straightway made answer with great authority, saying, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. [Acts 4, 19. 20.] It is hence that when Paul saw the chief Priest sitting in judgment [al. making resistance] against the Truth, and when his officer had struck him a blow on the cheek, he uttered not a curse, as being moved to wrath, but filled with the Spirit, prophesied with a free voice, saying, God shall smite thee, thou whited wall: for sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be smitten contrary to the law? [Acts 23, 3] It is hence that Stephen not even when doomed to die dreaded to put forth authoritativeness of voice in utterance against the power of his persecutors, saying, Ye stiff necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do alway resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye. [Acts 7, 51]
54. But that holy men burst into such high words from passionate affection for Truth, and not from the sin of pride, they themselves plainly point out, in that by other doings and other sayings they make it appear with what great humility they are adorned, and with what great charity they are inflamed toward those whom they rebuke. For pride begets hatred, humility only love. Thus the words which love makes bitter, flow, surely, from the fountain head of humility. Accordingly, how could Stephen utter reproach in pride, who with bended knee prayed for those whom he reproached, when they went on to worse and stoned him, saying, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. [ver. 60] How did Paul in pride utter words of bitterness against the Priest and Chief of his nation, who in humility lowers himself to the service of his disciples, saying, For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus our Lord, and ourselves your servants for Christ’s sake? [2 Cor. 4, 5] How did Peter resist the rulers from Pride? when in compassion to their erring course, he as it were makes excuse for their guilt, saying, I wot that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers. But those things which God before had showed by the mouth of all His prophets, that Christ should suffer, He hath so fulfilled. [Acts 3, 17. 18.] And he draws them in pity to life, saying, Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out. [ver. 19] How was it from pride that Elisha refused to come to the sight of Naaman, who not only let himself be seen, but even be taken hold of by a woman? concerning whom it is written, And when she came to the Man of God to the hill, she caught him by the feet, but Gehazi came near to thrust her away. And the Man if God said, Let her alone, for her soul is in bitterness. [2 Kings 4, 27] How was it in pride that Elijah uttered words of reproach against the proud king, seeing that he ran humbly before his chariot, as it is written, And he girded up his loins, and ran before Ahab? How was it of Pride that the man of God disregarded the presence of Jeroboam, who out of pity straightway restored his withered right hand to its former soundness? As it is written, And it came to pass, when king Jeroboam heard the saying of the man of God, which had cried against the altar in Bethel, that he put forth his hand from the altar, saying, Lay hold on him. And his hand dried up. [1 Kings 13, 4] And shortly after, And the man of God besought the face of the Lord, and the king's hand was restored him again, and became as it was before. [ver. 6] For as pride cannot give birth to miraculous powers, we are shown, in what a Spirit of humility the voice of upbraiding issues, in that signs go along with it. How did Nathan swell high in words of rebuke against king David, who when there was sin lacking that deserved rebuke, fell on his face upon the ground in his sight? as it is written, And they told the king, saying, Behold, Nathan the Prophet. And when he was come in before the king, he bowed himself before the king with his face to the ground. [1 Kings 1, 23] How could Moses, when he freely withstood the Egyptian king, indulge contempt for him, who while he held familiar communing with God worshipped with self-abasement Jethro his relation who was following him? to whose advice he paid such ready obedience, that after the secret communications of God, he accounted that great gain, which came to him without from the lips of man.
55. From one set of deeds of the Saints, then, we learn what account we are to take of another. For holy men are neither free spoken out of pride, nor submissive out of fear. But whenever uplightness uplifts them to freedom of speech, thought of their own weakness preserves them in self-abasement. For though, in chiding them, they smite as from above the misdoings of offenders, yet judging themselves the more exactly in their own eyes, they in a manner take their place amongst the refuse, and as they pursue after wickedness in others, so much the fiercer do they return to keep themselves in check; and, on the other hand, as they never spare themselves in doing better, they are the more watchful in rebuking the deeds of other men. For what, that is derived from the powers of man without, shall strike them with wonder, who alike look down upon themselves, even at the moment that now they have well nigh gotten hold of the summit of interior height. And so for this reason it is right for them to sit in judgment on the loftiness of earthly exaltation without, for that no load of swelling humour weighs down the eye within. Hence when blessed Job disregards earthly wisdom, and powers, and substance, in those friends that were full of harsh words, saying, Did I say, Bring unto me? or, Give me of your substance? or, Deliver me from the enemy's hand ? or, Redeem me from the hand of the mighty? Teach me, and I will hold my tongue, and cause me to understand wherein I have erred; what opinion he entertains about himself, he makes appear a little below, saying, Yea, ye overwhelm the fatherless. Thus it is clearer than the light what a weak nature he sees himself to be possessed of, in that he calls himself fatherless.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Job 6:24 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.