Skip to content
“Jesus, the Perfect High Priest”· Hebrews 7:23–28
Translation
King James Version
And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death:
Ask
KJV (with Strong's)
And G2532 they G1526 truly G3303 were G1526 G1096 many G4119 priests G2409, because they were not suffered G2967 to continue G3887 by reason of G1223 death G2288:
Ask
Complete Jewish Bible
Moreover, the present cohanim are many in number, because they are prevented by death from continuing in office.
Ask
Berean Standard Bible
Now there have been many other priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office.
Ask
American Standard Version
And they indeed have been made priests many in number, because that by death they are hindered from continuing:
Ask
World English Bible Messianic
Many, indeed, have been made priests, because they are hindered from continuing by death.
Ask
Geneva Bible (1599)
And among them many were made Priests, because they were not suffered to endure, by the reason of death.
Ask
Young's Literal Translation
and those indeed are many who have become priests, because by death they are hindered from remaining;
Ask
In the KJVVerse 30,088 of 31,102 · 96.7%

Study This Verse

Summary

Hebrews 7:23 succinctly highlights a fundamental limitation of the Old Covenant's Levitical priesthood: their inherent mortality. This verse serves as a crucial foundational statement, setting the stage for the author's profound argument concerning the unparalleled superiority and eternal nature of Jesus Christ's priesthood, which transcends the temporary and imperfect provisions of the former covenant due to His permanent, unchangeable life.

Context

Literary Context

The Book of Hebrews is a sophisticated theological treatise, meticulously arguing for the supremacy of Jesus Christ over every aspect of the Old Covenant. Following an extended discussion on Christ's superiority to angels (chapters 1-2), Moses (chapter 3), and the Sabbath rest (chapter 4), the author shifts focus to the priesthood in chapters 5-10. Chapter 7 specifically develops the argument for Christ's priesthood "after the order of Melchizedek," a priesthood superior to the Aaronic/Levitical system. Verse 23 is strategically placed to underscore the inherent flaw in the Levitical system—the mortality of its priests—thereby creating a stark contrast with the eternal priesthood of Christ, which is immediately introduced in Hebrews 7:24 and Hebrews 7:25. This verse functions as a premise for the conclusion that a new, more perfect priest was necessary.

Historical & Cultural Context

The Levitical priesthood was central to Israelite worship and the Old Covenant system. Priests, specifically those from the tribe of Levi and the lineage of Aaron, served as mediators between God and the people, offering sacrifices and performing rituals in the Tabernacle, and later the Temple. This system required a continuous line of priests, as the office was hereditary. However, the most significant practical limitation was the mortality of the priests themselves. Each priest's service was finite, interrupted by death, necessitating a constant succession. This meant that no single priest could offer a permanent, uninterrupted ministry, nor could they achieve a final, complete atonement. The Jewish audience of Hebrews would have been intimately familiar with this system and its inherent limitations, making the author's argument about Christ's eternal priesthood particularly impactful.

Key Themes

Hebrews 7:23 contributes significantly to several overarching themes in the book. Firstly, it highlights the theme of Mortality vs. Eternity, emphasizing that human priests, subject to death, could not provide a permanent solution for sin, in stark contrast to Christ's eternal life and ministry. Secondly, it underscores the Imperfection and Temporary Nature of the Old Covenant, demonstrating that a system requiring constant succession due to death was inherently flawed and provisional, paving the way for a "better hope" (Hebrews 7:19) and a "better covenant" (Hebrews 8:6). Thirdly, it sets up the theme of Succession vs. Unchangeable Priesthood, as the "many priests" of the Old Covenant are contrasted with the "one priest" who holds an "unchangeable priesthood" (Hebrews 7:24), thereby establishing the Superiority of Christ's Priesthood as the ultimate theological point.

Exposition and Analysis

Key Word Analysis

priests hiereús' G2409

Refers to those consecrated to sacred offices, particularly in the Old Testament, who mediated between God and humanity through sacrifices and rituals. In this context, it specifically denotes the Levitical priests. The use of the plural "many priests" immediately signals the transient nature of their office, as individual priests were replaced upon death.

suffered kōlýō' G2967

Means "to hinder," "to prevent," or "to forbid." This word highlights the external, insurmountable obstacle that prevented the Levitical priests from continuing their service. It's not that they chose not to continue, but that they were forcibly stopped by an unavoidable force—death. This emphasizes the lack of control and permanence inherent in their ministry.

continue paraménō' G3887

Signifies "to stay near," "to remain," or "to be permanent." The inability of the Levitical priests to "continue" underscores the temporary and interrupted nature of their service. Their ministry was not perpetual but was constantly broken by the succession necessitated by death, revealing a fundamental inadequacy in their capacity to provide a lasting solution for humanity's sin problem.

death thánatos' G2288

Refers to physical death, the cessation of life. In this verse, death is presented as the ultimate, unavoidable impediment to the Levitical priests' ministry. It is the decisive factor that renders their service impermanent and necessitates a continuous succession of "many priests." This biological reality serves as the primary theological argument for the need for a priest who is not subject to death.

Verse Breakdown

"And they truly were many priests"

This phrase acknowledges the historical reality of the Levitical priesthood. The emphasis on "many" is crucial, indicating a succession of individuals rather than a single, enduring office-holder. This multiplicity inherently suggests a lack of permanence and a system that required constant replacement.

"because they were not suffered to continue"

This clause provides the reason for the "many priests." The priests were "not suffered" or "prevented" from maintaining their office indefinitely. This highlights an external, unavoidable force that interrupted their ministry, signaling an inherent flaw or limitation within the system itself.

"by reason of death"

This final phrase explicitly identifies the insurmountable obstacle. Death was the ultimate barrier, rendering any individual priest's service finite and necessitating a continuous cycle of new priests. This biological reality underpins the theological argument for the inadequacy of the Old Covenant priesthood and sets the stage for the introduction of Christ's eternal, death-conquering ministry.

Literary Devices

The author of Hebrews employs several literary devices in this concise verse. Contrast is paramount, as the mortality of the Levitical priests is presented as a stark counterpoint to the impending revelation of Christ's eternal priesthood. The phrase "by reason of death" functions as a powerful statement of Cause and Effect, directly linking the priests' inability to continue their service to their inherent mortality. This simple, factual statement also carries the weight of Understatement or Litotes, as the profound theological implications of death's dominion over the Old Covenant system are conveyed with remarkable brevity. The verse also serves as a crucial piece of Rhetorical Argumentation, laying the necessary groundwork for the subsequent, more detailed exposition of Christ's superior and unchangeable priesthood in the verses that follow, effectively building a logical case for the New Covenant's supremacy.

Theological and Thematic Connections

Hebrews 7:23 profoundly illustrates the theological principle that human limitation, particularly mortality, inherently restricts the efficacy of any covenant mediated by finite beings. The constant succession of Levitical priests due to death underscored the provisional and imperfect nature of the Old Covenant's provisions for sin. It revealed that a truly permanent and effective redemption required a mediator who was not subject to the very power of death that sin introduced into the world. This verse, therefore, implicitly points to the necessity of a divine, eternal High Priest whose life and ministry could overcome death's barrier, providing an everlasting atonement and unfailing access to God. It highlights that the Old Covenant, while divinely ordained, was designed to reveal humanity's need for a perfect, eternal solution found only in Christ.

Reflection and Application

Hebrews 7:23, by exposing the inherent weakness of the Old Covenant priesthood, offers profound assurance and stability to believers today. We are not dependent on a succession of fallible, dying mediators for our access to God or the forgiveness of our sins. Instead, we have a High Priest, Jesus Christ, who is eternal, unchangeable, and has conquered death. His sacrifice was not one in a series of many, but a once-for-all act that perfectly atoned for sin. His intercession for us is not temporary but perpetual, meaning our standing before God is secure and our prayers are always heard through Him. This truth should fill us with immense confidence and peace, knowing that our salvation rests on an unshakeable foundation, not on human frailty or the limitations of earthly systems. It calls us to live with bold assurance, approaching God's throne with confidence, knowing our High Priest ever lives to intercede for us.

Questions for Reflection

  1. How does the mortality of the Levitical priests highlight the unique and superior nature of Jesus's priesthood for your personal faith?
  2. In what ways does knowing that Jesus's intercession is "unchangeable" and "perpetual" impact your confidence in prayer and your sense of security in Christ?
  3. What does this verse teach us about the temporary nature of earthly systems, even those divinely ordained, in contrast to the eternal nature of God's ultimate provision in Christ?

FAQ

Why does the author of Hebrews emphasize the priests' mortality so much?

The author emphasizes the priests' mortality to highlight a critical flaw in the Old Covenant's sacrificial system and priesthood. Because the Levitical priests were subject to death, their service was inherently temporary and interrupted. This constant succession meant that no single priest could offer a permanent, complete atonement for sin, nor could they provide continuous access to God. By stressing this limitation, the author builds a compelling argument for the necessity of a new, perfect High Priest—Jesus Christ—whose eternal life and unchangeable priesthood (Hebrews 7:24) overcome the deficiencies of the former system, offering a once-for-all sacrifice and perpetual intercession (Hebrews 7:25).

How does Hebrews 7:23 relate to the concept of the "new covenant"?

Hebrews 7:23 is foundational to understanding the necessity and superiority of the "new covenant." The mortality of the Levitical priests demonstrated that the Old Covenant, though divinely instituted, was imperfect and temporary in its ability to provide a lasting solution for sin and reconciliation with God. A covenant mediated by dying priests and requiring repeated sacrifices could not bring about perfect righteousness or permanent access. This verse, by exposing the Old Covenant's inherent weakness, sets the stage for the introduction of the new covenant, which is "better" because it is mediated by a perfect, eternal High Priest, Jesus Christ (Hebrews 8:6), whose single sacrifice definitively deals with sin and establishes a permanent relationship with God.

Christ-Centered Fulfillment

Hebrews 7:23, by underscoring the inherent and unavoidable limitation of the Old Covenant's Levitical priesthood—their mortality—serves as a poignant backdrop against which the unparalleled glory and efficacy of Jesus Christ's priesthood shine. The "many priests" who "were not suffered to continue by reason of death" perfectly illustrate the inadequacy of a system dependent on finite human mediators. This deficiency directly points to the divine necessity of a High Priest who is not subject to death, one who can offer a truly permanent and perfect mediation. Jesus Christ fulfills this need precisely because He has conquered death and possesses an "unchangeable priesthood" (Hebrews 7:24). His resurrection ensures that His ministry is perpetual, allowing Him to "save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them" (Hebrews 7:25). Unlike the Levitical priests who offered repeated sacrifices that could never fully take away sins, Christ, through His own blood, entered the holy places "once for all, having obtained eternal redemption" (Hebrews 9:12). Thus, the temporary and interrupted ministry of the Levitical priests, highlighted in Hebrews 7:23, finds its ultimate and perfect fulfillment in the eternal, living, and perpetually interceding High Priesthood of Jesus Christ, who has secured our lasting access to God.

Copy as

Public-domain commentary

Matthew Henry

From his Commentary on the Whole Bible. Henry comments on passages, not single verses — this entry covers Hebrews 7:11–28. His three-level outline is real structure in the source text, so it is rendered as structure.

1662–1714 · 18 verses
Passage under commentHebrews 7:11–28
I. II. Main points1. 2. Sub-points(1.) (2.) Details

Observe the necessity there was of raising up another priest, after the order of Melchisedec and not after the order of Aaron, by whom that perfection should come which could not come by the Levitical priesthood, which therefore must be changed, and the whole economy with it, Heb 7:11, Heb 7:12, etc. Here,

I.It is asserted that perfection could not come by the Levitical priesthood and the law.

They could not put those who came to them into the perfect enjoyment of the good things they pointed out to them; they could only show them the way.

II.That therefore another priest must be raised up, after the order of Melchisedec, by whom, and his law of faith, perfection might come to all who obey him; and, blessed be God, that we may have perfect holiness and perfect happiness by Christ in the covenant of grace, according to the gospel, for we are complete in him.

III.It is asserted that the priesthood being changed there must of necessity be a change of the law; there being so near a relation between the priesthood and the law, the dispensation could not be the same under another priesthood; a new priesthood must be under a new regulation, managed in another way, and by rules proper to its nature and order.

IV.It is not only asserted, but proved, that the priesthood and law are changed, Heb 7:13, Heb 7:14.

The priesthood and law by which perfection could not come are abolished, and a priest has arisen, and a dispensation is now set up, by which true believers may be made perfect. Now that there is such a change is obvious.

1.There is a change in the tribe of which the priesthood comes. Before, it was the tribe of Levi; but our great high priest sprang out of Judah, of which tribe Moses spoke nothing concerning the priesthood, Heb 7:14. This change of the family shows a real change of the law of the priesthood.

2.There is a change in the form and order of making the priests. Before, in the Levitical priesthood, they were made after the law of a carnal commandment; but our great high priest was made after the power of an endless life. The former law appointed that the office should descend, upon the death of the father, to his eldest son, according to the order of carnal or natural generation; for none of the high priests under the law were without father or mother, or without descent: they had not life and immortality in themselves. They had both beginning of days and end of life; and so the carnal commandment, or law of primogeniture, directed their succession, as it did in matters of civil right and inheritance. But the law by which Christ was constituted a priest, after the order of Melchisedec, was the power of an endless life. The life and immortality which he had in himself were his right and title to the priesthood, not his descent from former priests. This makes a great difference in the priesthood, and in the economy too, and gives the preference infinitely to Christ and the gospel. The very law which constituted the Levitical priesthood supposed the priests to be weak, frail, dying, creatures, not able to preserve their own natural lives, but who must be content and glad to survive in their posterity after the flesh; much less could they, by any power or authority they had, convey spiritual life and blessedness to those who came to them. But the high priest of our profession holds his office by that innate power of endless life which he has in himself, not only to preserve himself alive, but to communicate spiritual and eternal life to all those who duly rely upon his sacrifice and intercession. Some thing the law of the carnal commandment refers to the external rites of consecration, and the carnal offerings that were made; but the power of an endless life to the spiritual living sacrifices proper to the gospel, and the spiritual and eternal privileges purchased by Christ, who was consecrated by the eternal Spirit of life that he received without measure.

3.There is a change in the efficacy of the priesthood. The former was weak and unprofitable, made nothing perfect; the latter brought in a better hope, by which we draw near to God, Heb 7:18, Heb 7:19. The Levitical priesthood brought nothing to perfection: it could not justify men's persons from guilt; it could not sanctify them from inward pollution; it could not cleanse the consciences of the worshippers from dead works; all it could do was to lead them to the antitype. But the priesthood of Christ carries in it, and brings along with it, a better hope; it shows us the true foundation of all the hope we have towards God for pardon and salvation; it more clearly discovers the great objects of our hope; and so it tends to work in us a more strong and lively hope of acceptance with God. By this hope we are encouraged to draw nigh unto God, to enter into a covenant-union with him, to live a life of converse and communion with him. We may now draw near with a true heart, and with the full assurance of faith, having our minds sprinkled from an evil conscience. The former priesthood rather kept men at a distance, and under a spirit of bondage.

4.There is a change in God's way of acting in this priesthood. He has taken an oath to Christ, which he never did to any of the order of Aaron. God never gave them any such assurance of their continuance, never engaged himself by oath or promise that theirs should be an everlasting priesthood, and therefore gave them no reason to expect the perpetuity of it, but rather to look upon it as a temporary law. But Christ was made a priest with the oath of God: The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec, Heb 7:21. Here God has upon oath declared the immutability, excellency, efficacy, and eternity, of the priesthood of Christ.

5.There is a change in that covenant of which the priesthood was a security and the priest a surety; that is, a change in the dispensation of that covenant. The gospel dispensation is more full, free, perspicuous, spiritual, and efficacious, than that of the law. Christ is in this gospel covenant a surety for us to God and for God to us, to see that the articles be performed on both parts He, as surety, has united the divine and human nature together in his own person, and therein given assurance of reconciliation; and he has, as surety, united God and man together in the bond of the everlasting covenant. He pleads with men to keep their covenant with god, and he pleads with God that he will fulfil his promises to men, which he is always ready to do in a way suitable to his majesty and glory, that is, through a Mediator.

6.There is a remarkable change in the number of the priests under these different orders. In that of Aaron there was a multitude of priests, of high priests, not at once, but successively; but in this of Christ there is but one and the same. The reason is plain, The Levitical priests were many, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death. Their office, how high and honourable soever, could not secure them from dying; and, as one died, another must succeed, and after a while must give place to a third, till the number had become very great. But this our high priest continues for ever, and his priesthood is aparabaton - an unchangeable one, that does not pass from one to another, as the former did; it is always in the same hand. There can be no vacancy in this priesthood, no hour nor moment in which the people are without a priest to negotiate their spiritual concerns in heaven. Such a vacancy might be very dangerous and prejudicial to them; but this is their safety and happiness, that this ever-living high priest is able to save to the utmost - in all times, in all cases, in every juncture - all who come to God by him, Heb 7:25. So that here is a manifest alteration much for the better.

7.There is a remarkable difference in the moral qualifications of the priests. Those who were of the order of Aaron were not only mortal men, but sinful men, who had their sinful as well as natural infirmities; they needed to offer up sacrifices first for their own sins and then for the people. But our high priest, who was consecrated by the word of the oath, needed only to offer up once for the people, never at all for himself; for he has not only an immutable consecration to his office, but an immutable sanctity in his person. He is such a high priest as became us, holy, harmless, and undefiled, etc., Heb 7:26-28. Here observe,

(1.)Our case, as sinners, needed a high priest to make satisfaction and intercession for us.

(2.)No priest could be suitable or sufficient for our reconciliation to God but one who was perfectly righteous in his own person; he must be righteous in himself, or he could not be a propitiation for our sin, or our advocate with the Father.

(3.)The Lord Jesus was exactly such a high priest as we wanted, for he has a personal holiness, absolutely perfect. Observe the description we have of the personal holiness of Christ expressed in various terms, all of which some learned divines consider as relating to his perfect purity. [1.] He is holy, perfectly free from all the habits or principles of sin, not having the least disposition to it in his nature; no sin dwells in him, though it does in the best of Christians, not the least sinful inclination [2.] He is harmless, perfectly free from all actual transgression, has done no violence, nor is there any deceit in his mouth, never did the least wrong to God or man. [3.] He is undefiled, he was never accessory to other men's sins. It is a difficult thing to keep ourselves pure, so as not to partake in the guilt of other men's sins, by contributing in some way towards them, or not doing what we ought to prevent them. Christ was undefiled; though he took upon him the guilt of our sins, yet he never involved himself in the fact and fault of them. [4.] He is separate from sinners, not only in his present state (having entered as our high priest into the holiest of all, into which nothing defiled can enter), but in his personal purity: he has no such union with sinners, either natural or federal, as can devolve upon him original sin. This comes upon us by virtue of our natural and federal union with the first Adam, we descending from him in the ordinary way. But Christ was, by his ineffable conception in the virgin, separate from sinners; though he took a true human nature, yet the miraculous way in which it was conceived set him upon a separate footing from all the rest of mankind. [5.] He is made higher than the heavens. Most expositors understand this concerning his state of exaltation in heaven, at the right hand of God, to perfect the design of his priesthood. But Dr. Goodwin thinks this may be very justly referred to the personal holiness of Christ, which is greater and more perfect than the holiness of the hosts of heaven, that is, the holy angels themselves, who, though they are free from sin, yet are not in themselves free from all possibility of sinning. And therefore we read, God putteth no trust in his holy ones, and he chargeth his angels with folly (Job 4:18), that is, with weakness and peccability. They may be angels one hour and devils another, as many of them were; and that the holy angels shall not now fall does not proceed from an indefectibility of nature, but from the election of God; they are elect angels. It is very probable that this explanation of the words, made higher than the heavens, may be thought too much strained, and that it ought to be understood of the dignity of Christ's state, and not the perfect holiness of his person; and the rather because it is said he was made higher genomenos; but it is well known that this word is used in a neutral sense, as where it is said, genesthē ho Theos alēthēs - Let God be true. The other characters in the verse plainly belong to the personal perfection of Christ in holiness, as opposed to the sinful infirmities of the Levitical priests; and it seems congruous to think this must do so too, if it may be fairly taken in such a sense; and it appears yet more probable, since the validity and prevalency of Christ's priesthood in Heb 7:27 are placed in the impartiality and disinterestedness of it. He needed not to offer up for himself: it was a disinterested mediation; he mediated for that mercy for others which he did not need for himself; had he needed it himself, he had been a party, and could not have been a Mediator - a criminal, and could not have been an advocate for sinners. Now, to render his mediation the more impartial and disinterested, it seems requisite not only that he had no present need of that favour for himself which he mediated for in behalf of others, but that he never could stand in need of it. Though he needed it not today, yet if he knew he might be in such circumstances as to need it tomorrow, or at any future time, he must have been thought to have had some eye upon his own interest, and therefore could not act with impartial regard and pure zeal for the honour of God on one hand, and tender pure compassion for poor sinners on the other. I pretend not here to follow the notes of our late excellent expositor, into whose labours we have entered, but have taken the liberty to vindicate this notion of the learned Dr. Goodwin from the exceptions that I know have been made to it; and I have the rather done it because, if it will hold good, it gives us further evidence how necessary it was that the Mediator should be God, since no mere creature is of himself possessed of that impeccability which will set him above all possible need of favour and mercy for himself.

Copy as

Historical interpretation

Six Centuries of Reception

3 surviving comments on this verse. Each one is dated, so this reads as a timeline rather than a list.

3 quotes · AD 407–990
Post-NiceneEarly Medieval
4005006007008009001000

Select a marker to jump to its quote. Markers stagger vertically where authors wrote within a few decades of each other.

"And inasmuch as not without an oath." What is "And inasmuch as not without an oath"? That is, Behold another difference also. And these things were not merely promised (he says). "For those priests were made without an oath, but This with an oath, by Him that said unto Him, The Lord swore and will not repent, Thou art Priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec. By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better covenant." He lays down two points of difference, that it hath no end as the covenant of the Law had; and this he proves from its being Christ who exercises the priesthood; for he says "according to the power of an endless life." And he proves it also from the oath, because "He swore," and from the fact; for if the other was cast out, because it was weak, this stands firm, because it is powerful. He proves it also from the priest. How? Because He is One only; and there would not have been One only, unless He had been immortal. For as there were many priests, because they were mortal, so here is The One, because He is immortal. "By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better covenant," inasmuch as He swore to Him that He should always be Priest; which He would not have done, if He were not living.
What he says: "to intercede," take as what is said: "We have an advocate with the Father." (1 Jn. 2:1) From His very incarnation, He asks and intercedes with the Father that He may have mercy on us.
He said that the new covenant is better. And this indicates, he says, the difference of the priests. He said that everything has changed. Therefore, he speaks of the reason for the change, and he says, "For annulment occurs of the preceding command.” Therefore, an annulment occurs when the preceding commandment is in force, that is, of the older law. Not simply, but then when it was found to be weak and unprofitable. Since there is no fault, what need is there for the change? Therefore, he says, this is also the law. For this, the preceding commandment has been annulled due to weakness and uselessness.
For the law was not able to produce any perfection in virtue. For it only said, "Do this," and "Do not do that," and it was no longer able to strengthen and assist in bringing about what was said, which now happens to us through the Spirit.
"but is a certain introduction." It is done in common.
"of a greater hope." For the law had hope, but not such as that which was introduced. For those who were observing the law hoped to possess the land. "For you shall eat the good things of the land," (Is. 1:19) but the hope through Christ gives the kingdom of heaven, and the nearness to stand before God, and to serve Him with angels.He said above (Heb. 4:6): Entering into the inner part of the veil; but now: Through which we draw near to God, he says; for the hope that is with him leads us to the divine throne, and stands with the Cherubim.
"because the matter was not done without an oath." And so much, he says, the hope has been greatly improved, insofar as Christ has become a priest without an oath. For the oath indicates the unchangeable nature of his being a high priest forever.
"For they indeed became priests without an oath." Then, from the lesser, the comparisons of the priests among the Jews and our High Priest.For the legal priests, he says, were made priests without an oath; for God never found it necessary to swear: "You shall be a priest according to the law." But Christ, with an oath, made by the one who said to Him, as it were, by God; for God spoke through David: "You are a priest," in a certain new way; for He is not according to Aaron, but according to Melchizedek.
"by the one who said to him." As through God. For God spoke through David, "So much better is Jesus." "For," he says, "they indeed became priests without an oath, but Christ has become a high priest with an oath. And this would not have happened, he says, if the difference were not great. Therefore, there is also a great difference between the new and the old."
"the Guarantor [Έγγυος]." Like a guarantor [ἐγγυητὴς], Mediator.
"And indeed, there were many." And according to another, he says, the high priest is greater than us, not only because of the oath, but also because he is immortal.
"because they were prevented by death." For it is through death and change, namely of the priest.
"from continuing." in the priesthood, namely, "permanently." Lacking succession, forever, "Therefore." Since he always living. "always." Not only in this age, but also in the future. For this is what they want entirely and completely.
"those who come to God." Through the faith that is in Him. For whoever believes in the Son, comes to the Father certainly; for he himself is the way to the Father, and whoever takes hold of this, dwells there.
"always living." Therefore, He saves completely, because He always lives. Furthermore, He saves because He intercedes for those who approach God the Father.
"to intercede for them." Concerning Christ, as He is according to the flesh, this humble word has been said. However, when I say according to the flesh, I do not mean division. Far from it: but I know Him to be worshiped indivisibly, without confusion in one hypostasis along with His flesh. But what does it mean, "to intercede for them "? For example, He asks his Father on our behalf. For when he called him a priest, it is characteristic of a priest to ask on behalf of the people; for this reason, he said, “to intercede." That this has been said for this reason is evident. For He who raises the dead by His own authority, forgives sins, does not need the Father to save, as if He were powerless to save by His own power.
Source: Quotations drawn from early Church Fathers and historical Christian theologians (AD 100–1500). Some quotes address the surrounding passage context rather than this verse alone.
Copy as

Continue studying Hebrews 7:23 across the web’s major study libraries — every link below opens this exact verse, chapter, or book on the destination site.

TrulyRandomVerse is not affiliated with these sites and doesn’t control their content. They’re linked because they’re genuinely useful.