(The Lord speaking is red text)
Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us [therefore] a possession among the brethren of our father.
Why should the name of our father be eliminated from his family just because he didn't have a son? Give us property to possess along with the brothers of our father."
Why should the name of our father disappear from his clan because he had no sons? Give us property among our father’s brothers.”
Why should the name of our father be taken away from among his family, because he had no son? Give unto us a possession among the brethren of our father.
Why should the name{H8034} of our father{H1} be done away{H1639} from among{H8432} his family{H4940}, because he hath no son{H1121}? Give{H5414} unto us therefore a possession{H272} among{H8432} the brethren{H251} of our father{H1}.
Numbers 27:4 is part of the narrative in the Book of Numbers, which is the fourth book of the Pentateuch, the foundational texts of the Hebrew Bible and the Old Testament. The verse is set within the context of the Israelites' wandering in the wilderness, as they prepare to enter the Promised Land. The book primarily deals with laws, narratives of the Israelites' journey, and the organization of the tribes of Israel.
In this particular verse, the daughters of Zelophehad—Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah—speak to Moses, Eleazar the priest, and the leaders of the congregation. They present a case concerning the inheritance of their father's property. According to the customs of the time, property was typically passed down from father to son, and women did not have the right to inherit. However, Zelophehad had no sons, and his daughters were concerned that their father's name would be lost from among his family because of this.
The daughters' appeal is significant for several reasons:
1. **Inheritance Rights**: It challenges the existing patriarchal system by asking for their father's inheritance, which was not a standard practice for women.
2. **Legal Precedent**: Their request leads to a legal innovation, as Moses brings their case before the Lord. The response from God (in the subsequent verses) establishes a new law allowing daughters to inherit when there are no sons.
3. **Gender Equality**: While the society of the time was largely patriarchal, this story reflects an early instance of advocacy for gender equality in the context of inheritance rights.
4. **Family Continuity**: The daughters' concern for their father's name illustrates the importance of familial lineage and the desire to maintain the memory and legacy of their father within the tribe.
5. **Divine Justice**: The story underscores a theme of divine justice and mercy, as God is portrayed as responsive to the pleas of the disenfranchised and willing to adapt laws to ensure fairness.
In summary, Numbers 27:4 captures a pivotal moment where the daughters of Zelophehad advocate for their rights within a patriarchal society, leading to a divine legislative change that would affect the inheritance laws of Israel, ensuring that names and property could be passed down through the daughters when no male heirs were present. This narrative is a testament to the dynamic nature of biblical law and the recognition of women's roles and rights within the community.
*This commentary is produced by Microsoft/WizardLM-2-8x22B AI model
Note: H = Hebrew (OT), G = Greek (NT)