(The Lord speaking is red text)
¶ And, behold, the servants of David and Joab came from [pursuing] a troop, and brought in a great spoil with them: but Abner [was] not with David in Hebron; for he had sent him away, and he was gone in peace.
Just then David's men and Yo'av returned from a raid, bringing a lot of plunder with them. But Avner was not with David in Hevron, because he had sent him off under safe conduct.
Just then David’s soldiers and Joab returned from a raid, bringing with them a great plunder. But Abner was not with David in Hebron because David had sent him on his way in peace.
And, behold, the servants of David and Joab came from a foray, and brought in a great spoil with them: but Abner was not with David in Hebron; for he had sent him away, and he was gone in peace.
And, behold, the servants{H5650} of David{H1732} and Joab{H3097} came{H935} from pursuing a troop{H1416}, and brought in{H935} a great{H7227} spoil{H7998} with them: but Abner{H74} was not with David{H1732} in Hebron{H2275}; for he had sent him away{H7971}, and he was gone{H3212} in peace{H7965}.
2 Samuel 3:22 is a verse set within the broader narrative of the succession struggle following the death of King Saul and the eventual rise of David to the throne of Israel. The verse captures a moment in the complex political landscape where David is consolidating his power. Here's a summary of the themes and historical context:
In the historical context, David is recognized as the anointed successor to Saul, but his path to the throne is not straightforward. He initially rules over Judah from Hebron while Saul's son, Ish-bosheth, reigns over the rest of Israel, with Abner, Saul's cousin and military commander, as the power behind the throne. The verse reflects the shifting allegiances and military maneuvers characteristic of the time.
The theme of loyalty and treachery is central to this verse. Abner, once a staunch supporter of Saul's house, has been negotiating with David, indicating a significant political realignment. The verse mentions that Abner is not with David in Hebron, which is notable because it was Abner who had been instrumental in bolstering David's position by bringing the elders of Israel to him (as seen in 2 Samuel 3:17-19). The fact that Abner had been sent away and departed "in peace" suggests a formal parting, possibly after concluding some agreement, which is confirmed in the subsequent verses where Abner pledges to secure all Israel for David.
The returning servants of David and Joab, David's nephew and military commander, with a great spoil, indicates successful military campaigns, which would have increased David's prestige and resources, further solidifying his position. However, the peace between David and Abner is short-lived, as Joab, holding a personal grudge against Abner for killing his brother Asahel, will soon act to undermine this alliance by treacherously murdering Abner (2 Samuel 3:27).
In summary, 2 Samuel 3:22 captures a moment of transition and tension in the succession narrative, highlighting the themes of loyalty, power struggles, and the complex interplay of political and personal motives that characterized the period of David's rise to power over a united Israel.
*This commentary is produced by Microsoft/WizardLM-2-8x22B AI model
Note: H = Hebrew (OT), G = Greek (NT)