(The Lord speaking is red text)
And Zorah, and Aijalon, and Hebron, which [are] in Judah and in Benjamin fenced cities.
Tzor'ah, Ayalon and Hevron; these are fortified cities in Y'hudah and Binyamin.
Zorah, Aijalon, and Hebron, the fortified cities in Judah and Benjamin.
and Zorah, and Aijalon, and Hebron, which are in Judah and in Benjamin, fortified cities.
And Zorah{H6881}, and Aijalon{H357}, and Hebron{H2275}, which are in Judah{H3063} and in Benjamin{H1144} fenced{H4694} cities{H5892}.
2 Chronicles 1:10 is a verse that falls within the historical narrative of the early division of the Kingdom of Israel after the death of King Solomon. The verse specifically lists cities that were fortified by Rehoboam, Solomon's son, who became the king of Judah after the northern tribes seceded to form the Kingdom of Israel under Jeroboam.
The cities mentioned—Zorah, Aijalon, and Hebron—were strategically significant. Zorah was located in the Shephelah, the lowlands between the central highlands and the coastal plain, a region that was frequently contested due to its agricultural richness and its role as a buffer against incursions from the coastal Philistines. Aijalon was also in the Shephelah and was known for its strong defensive position, having been the site of a significant battle where Joshua commanded the sun to stand still (Joshua 10:12-14). Hebron, situated in the hill country of Judah, was an important city with deep historical roots, having been the first capital of King David before he captured Jerusalem.
By fortifying these cities, Rehoboam was taking steps to secure his southern kingdom's defenses. This action reflects the political and military instability of the time, as well as the importance of stronghold cities in ancient warfare for protection and as symbols of royal authority. The mention of these cities being "fenced" or fortified also underscores the preparations for potential conflicts with the northern kingdom or other external threats.
In summary, 2 Chronicles 11:10 highlights the strategic military and political efforts of Rehoboam to strengthen his kingdom in the face of division and potential external threats. The fortification of these cities was a necessary response to the new geopolitical reality following the split of the united monarchy and reflects the broader themes of political upheaval, territorial control, and national security that are prevalent throughout the historical books of the Bible.
*This commentary is produced by Microsoft/WizardLM-2-8x22B AI model
Note: H = Hebrew (OT), G = Greek (NT)