(The Lord speaking is red text)
And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven thousand horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen: David also houghed all the chariot [horses], but reserved of them an hundred chariots.
David captured 1,000 chariots, 7,000 horsemen and 20,000 foot soldiers. He reserved enough horses for 100 chariots and disabled the rest.
David captured from him a thousand chariots, seven thousand charioteers, and twenty thousand foot soldiers, and he hamstrung all the horses except a hundred he kept for the chariots.
And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven thousand horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen; and David hocked all the chariot horses, but reserved of them for a hundred chariots.
And David{H1732} took{H3920} from him a thousand{H505} chariots{H7393}, and seven{H7651} thousand{H505} horsemen{H6571}, and twenty{H6242} thousand{H505} footmen{H376}{H7273}: David{H1732} also houghed{H6131} all the chariot{H7393} horses, but reserved{H3498} of them an hundred{H3967} chariots{H7393}.
1 Chronicles 18:4 is part of a larger narrative that details the military campaigns of King David, highlighting his victories and the expansion of his kingdom. The verse specifically recounts the aftermath of David's defeat of Hadadezer, king of Zobah, an Aramean state to the northeast of Israel. In the context of ancient warfare, the acquisition of chariots, horsemen, and footmen would have significantly bolstered David's military strength.
The act of David taking a thousand chariots, seven thousand horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen from Hadadezer underscores the scale of his victory and the subsequent increase in his military resources. Chariots were a symbol of power and a key component of the military technology of the time, serving as a mobile platform for archers and providing a psychological edge in battle. Horsemen would have been valuable for their speed and mobility, while footmen represented the backbone of the infantry.
David's decision to hamstring all the chariot horses, except for a reserve of a hundred chariots, is particularly noteworthy. Hamstringing, or "hougheding," involved severing the tendons at the back of the horses' legs, rendering them useless for military purposes. This act was likely a strategic choice to prevent the horses from being used against him in future conflicts, while also serving as a demonstration of his complete dominance over the defeated enemy. The sparing of a hundred chariots suggests a balance between military pragmatism and the display of power; David kept a functional chariot force for his own use, while disabling the rest to ensure the supremacy of his rule.
In summary, 1 Chronicles 18:4 reflects the themes of military conquest, the expansion of King David's influence, and the strategic management of resources in the aftermath of victory. It also illustrates the harsh realities of warfare in the ancient Near East, where the total subjugation of an enemy was often seen as necessary for securing and maintaining power. The historical context of this verse is set during the United Monarchy period, when David was consolidating his kingdom and establishing Israel as a significant power in the region.
*This commentary is produced by Microsoft/WizardLM-2-8x22B AI model
Note: H = Hebrew (OT), G = Greek (NT)