Ruth 4:8

Therefore the kinsman said unto Boaz, Buy [it] for thee. So he drew off his shoe.

Therefore the kinsman {H1350} said {H559} unto Boaz {H1162}, Buy {H7069} it for thee. So he drew off {H8025} his shoe {H5275}.

So the redeemer said to Bo'az, "Buy it for yourself," and took off his shoe.

So the kinsman-redeemer removed his sandal and said to Boaz, β€œBuy it for yourself.”

So the near kinsman said unto Boaz, Buy it for thyself. And he drew off his shoe.

Commentary

Ruth 4:8 captures a pivotal moment in the legal transfer of rights concerning Naomi's land and Ruth's future. It seals the transaction where the closer kinsman publicly relinquishes his right of redemption, allowing Boaz to step in.

Context

This verse follows the dramatic scene at the city gate, where Boaz, according to Israelite law, confronts the unnamed kinsman who had the first right to redeem Naomi's land and, by extension, marry Ruth to raise up an heir for the deceased Elimelech (Naomi's husband). The kinsman initially expressed willingness to redeem the land but balked when he realized that redeeming the land came with the obligation of marrying Ruth, which he feared would "mar his own inheritance." His refusal cleared the path for Boaz to act as the kinsman-redeemer. The act described here is the formal, public declaration of that refusal, solidifying Boaz's right.

Key Themes

  • Redemption and Restoration: This verse is a critical step in the redemption narrative of Ruth and Naomi, symbolizing the restoration of their family line and property. Boaz's willingness to redeem embodies God's provision and faithfulness.
  • Ancient Legal Customs: It highlights the intricate and public nature of legal transactions in ancient Israel, emphasizing transparency and the binding force of agreements.
  • Divine Providence: While human laws and decisions are at play, the overarching narrative of Ruth demonstrates God's sovereign hand guiding events to fulfill His purposes, particularly in preserving the lineage through which the Messiah would come.

Linguistic Insights

The phrase "drew off his shoe" refers to a specific Israelite legal custom, primarily detailed in Deuteronomy 25:7-10. In cases where a man refused to fulfill his duty to marry his deceased brother's widow (the "levirate marriage" custom) and raise an heir, the widow would take off his shoe, spit in his face, and his house would be called "the house of him that hath his shoe loosed." While the context in Ruth 4 is slightly different (it's about redeeming land and a widow, not strictly levirate marriage, but a related obligation), the symbolic act of removing the shoe carried the same meaning: a public renunciation of rights and obligations. It was a visible sign to all witnesses that the kinsman was giving up his claim, allowing Boaz to proceed.

Practical Application

Ruth 4:8 reminds us of several enduring truths:

  • God's Faithfulness in Complexities: Even when human laws and customs seem complicated, God works through them to bring about His perfect plan. Naomi and Ruth's future was secured through this legal process.
  • Integrity and Public Witness: The public nature of the transaction underscored the importance of integrity and accountability in agreements, a principle still valuable today.
  • The Ultimate Redeemer: Boaz's role as a willing kinsman-redeemer foreshadows the ultimate redemption offered through Jesus Christ. Just as Boaz willingly paid the price and took on the obligation to restore Ruth and Naomi, Christ, our divine Kinsman-Redeemer, paid the ultimate price to redeem humanity from sin and death, offering us a new inheritance and a secure future.
Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated β€” the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

No cross-references found.