Numbers 36:11

For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father's brothers' sons:

For Mahlah {H4244}, Tirzah {H8656}, and Hoglah {H2295}, and Milcah {H4435}, and Noah {H5270}, the daughters {H1323} of Zelophehad {H6765}, were married {H802} unto their father's {H1730} brothers' sons {H1121}:

Machlah, Tirtzah, Hoglah, Milkah and No'ah all got married to sons of their father's brothers.

Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married to cousins on their father’s side.

for Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father’s brothers’ sons.

Commentary

Numbers 36:11 KJV records the fulfillment of a specific divine decree concerning the inheritance of the daughters of Zelophehad, ensuring that their land remained within their ancestral tribe.

Context

This verse concludes a fascinating legal case in ancient Israel, which began with the daughters of Zelophehad's petition to Moses in Numbers 27. Their father, Zelophehad of the tribe of Manasseh, died without sons, leaving his five daughters (Mahlah, Tirzah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Noah) without an heir to inherit his portion of the Promised Land. God, through Moses, ruled in their favor, establishing a precedent that daughters could inherit if there were no sons, thereby preserving the family name and legacy.

However, a new concern arose among the leaders of their tribe, the family of Gilead, son of Machir, son of Manasseh. They feared that if these daughters married men from other tribes, their inherited land would transfer to those tribes, thereby diminishing their own tribal allotment (as detailed in Numbers 36:1-4). God addressed this issue directly, instructing that while the daughters could marry anyone they chose, they must marry within their own tribe, specifically "only to the family of the tribe of their father" (Numbers 36:6). This verse confirms their obedience to that specific command, marrying their cousins – "their father's brothers' sons" – thus keeping the inheritance within the family and tribe.

Key Themes

  • Preservation of Inheritance and Tribal Land: The primary concern driving this legislation was the integrity of the tribal land distribution. The land was a sacred trust, given by God, and its boundaries were to be maintained. This marriage arrangement ensured that the land allocated to Zelophehad's family remained within the tribe of Manasseh, upholding the principle that land ultimately belonged to the Lord and was to be kept within its assigned tribal boundaries.
  • Divine Justice and Wisdom: God's ruling demonstrates His meticulous attention to justice and fairness for individuals (the daughters' right to inheritance) while also maintaining the broader communal and national structure (tribal land integrity). It shows a divine wisdom that provides solutions to complex legal and social dilemmas.
  • Obedience and Faithfulness: The daughters of Zelophehad, having received an unprecedented inheritance, faithfully followed the subsequent divine instruction regarding their marriages. Their obedience ensured the long-term stability of the land distribution and served as an example of trust in God's provision and guidance.

Practical Application

Numbers 36:11, though dealing with ancient Israelite land laws, offers timeless principles. It highlights God's concern for:

  • Equitable Treatment: God cares about fair treatment for all individuals, even those in vulnerable positions (like women in a patriarchal society seeking inheritance). We are called to seek justice and equity in our own spheres.
  • Stewardship and Legacy: The emphasis on preserving inheritance speaks to the importance of stewarding what God has given us – whether material possessions, spiritual gifts, or family heritage. We are called to manage resources wisely and consider the long-term impact of our decisions.
  • Wisdom in Community: The narrative shows how divine wisdom can resolve conflicts between individual rights and communal needs. In our communities, we are often called to find solutions that uphold justice for individuals while also ensuring the well-being and stability of the larger group.

Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated — the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

  • Numbers 27:1 (4 votes)

    ¶ Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these [are] the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah.
  • Numbers 26:33 (2 votes)

    And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad [were] Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.