Job 22:1
¶ Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said,
Next Elifaz the Teimani replied:
Then Eliphaz the Temanite replied:
Then answered Eliphaz the Temanite, and said,
Cross-References
No cross-references found.
¶ Then Eliphaz the Temanite answered and said,
Next Elifaz the Teimani replied:
Then Eliphaz the Temanite replied:
Then answered Eliphaz the Temanite, and said,
No cross-references found.
Commentary
Job 22:1 serves as a simple yet pivotal introductory verse, marking the commencement of the third and final speech delivered by Eliphaz the Temanite, one of Job's three friends. In the dramatic narrative of the Book of Job, this verse signals a new phase in the intense theological debate surrounding Job's immense suffering.
Context
The Book of Job is a profound exploration of human suffering, divine justice, and the nature of faith. Following Job's catastrophic losses and profound personal anguish, his three friends—Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar—arrive to offer comfort and counsel. However, their initial seven days of silent sympathy quickly devolve into a cycle of increasingly harsh accusations. Each friend takes turns asserting that Job's suffering must be a direct consequence of his sin, based on the traditional doctrine of retribution (that the righteous prosper and the wicked suffer).
Job 22:1 positions Eliphaz for his third round of arguments. Having previously based his counsel on personal experience and a vision (Job 4-5) and general wisdom (Job 15), Eliphaz now launches his most direct and severe attack, abandoning subtlety and accusing Job of specific, grievous sins. This verse sets the stage for a critical turning point where the friends' patience and empathy have worn thin, replaced by a firm conviction of Job's guilt.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The Hebrew phrase translated "answered and said" (וַיַּעַן אֱלִיפַז הַתֵּימָנִי וַיֹּאמֶר, vayya'an 'Eliphaz ha-Temani vayyomer) is a common biblical idiom for introducing a speech in response to a preceding one. The term "answered" (וַיַּעַן, vayya'an) doesn't necessarily imply a direct, logical refutation but simply that a reply is being given in the ongoing conversation. In this context, it signals the continuation of the back-and-forth between Job and his friends, emphasizing the cyclical nature of their unresolved debate.
Significance and Application
While brief, Job 22:1 is significant for its role in the book's structure and message. It signals the beginning of Eliphaz's most direct assault on Job's character, setting the stage for the intense accusations that follow. For the reader, it serves as a reminder of how easily preconceived notions can lead to judgment rather than compassion, especially when dealing with suffering. The friends, despite their good intentions, become instruments of further distress for Job, failing to offer true comfort or understanding. This verse invites us to consider our own responses to those in pain and the importance of truly listening before offering counsel, rather than imposing our own explanations based on limited understanding, a lesson ultimately reinforced by God's direct intervention later in the book.
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated — the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.