Genesis 30:34
And Laban said, Behold, I would it might be according to thy word.
Lavan replied, "As you have said, so be it."
“Agreed,” said Laban. “Let it be as you have said.”
And Laban said, Behold, I would it might be according to thy word.
Cross-References
-
1 Corinthians 7:7 (3 votes)
For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that. -
1 Corinthians 14:5 (3 votes)
I would that ye all spake with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater [is] he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying. -
Numbers 22:29 (3 votes)
And Balaam said unto the ass, Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee. -
Galatians 5:12 (3 votes)
I would they were even cut off which trouble you.
Commentary
Genesis 30:34 marks a critical juncture in the ongoing, often contentious, relationship between Jacob and his uncle and father-in-law, Laban. In this verse, Laban readily agrees to Jacob’s proposed new terms for his wages, believing the arrangement will significantly benefit him.
Context
This verse occurs after Jacob has faithfully served Laban for many years, enduring Laban's deceptive practices, including the infamous switch of Leah for Rachel. Jacob’s wealth had grown, but Laban, ever manipulative, had changed his wages ten times (as Jacob later recounts in Genesis 31:7). To resolve the dispute over his compensation, Jacob proposes a new, seemingly disadvantageous, system: he would only take the speckled, spotted, and brown sheep and goats, and the black sheep, from the flocks. All pure-colored animals would belong to Laban. This arrangement appeared to put Jacob at a significant disadvantage, as these specific types were less common among the pure-bred flocks, leading Laban to quickly concur, seeing it as a deal in his favor.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The phrase "according to thy word" (Hebrew: כְּדְבָרֶךָ, ke-devar-ekha) is a direct and unreserved affirmation. It signifies Laban's full acceptance of Jacob's terms without reservation. While not particularly nuanced, it emphasizes the transactional nature of their relationship, which was often characterized by suspicion and negotiation rather than genuine familial trust.
Practical Application
This verse offers several valuable insights for believers today:
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated — the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.