Ezra 10:42
Shallum, Amariah, [and] Joseph.
Shalum, Amaryah and Yosef; and
Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
Cross-References
No cross-references found.
Shallum, Amariah, [and] Joseph.
Shalum, Amaryah and Yosef; and
Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.
Shallum, Amariah, Joseph.
No cross-references found.
Commentary
Commentary on Ezra 10:42 (KJV)
Ezra 10:42 simply lists three names: "Shallum, Amariah, [and] Joseph." This concise verse is part of a longer register found in Ezra 10:25-43, detailing the men who had taken foreign wives and were required to put them away according to the covenant made with God.
Context
The book of Ezra chronicles the return of the Jewish exiles from Babylon to Jerusalem and their efforts to rebuild the temple and re-establish their community under God's law. Chapter 10 marks a critical turning point following a period of great distress and confession. Ezra had learned that many of the returnees, including priests and Levites, had intermarried with the peoples of the land, contrary to God's explicit commands (e.g., Deuteronomy 7:3-4). This sin threatened the spiritual purity and distinct identity of Israel, potentially leading them back into idolatry and assimilation, which was precisely what had led to their Babylonian exile in the first place.
In response to Ezra's profound grief and prayer, the people entered into a solemn covenant to confess their sin and separate themselves from their foreign wives and children. Ezra 10:42, therefore, names individuals like Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph as part of this collective act of repentance and obedience. Their inclusion in this list signifies their participation in this difficult, yet necessary, act of spiritual purification.
Key Themes
Linguistic Insights
The KJV's use of "[and]" in brackets indicates that this word is not present in the original Hebrew text but was added by the translators for clarity and flow in English. The names themselves are Hebrew and carry meaning:
While the meanings of these individual names are not directly tied to the narrative of Ezra 10:42 itself, they reflect the common practice of naming children with theological significance in ancient Israel.
Practical Application
While the specific command regarding intermarriage with foreign nations does not apply in the same way to believers under the New Covenant (where the focus is on not being unequally yoked with unbelievers), the principles behind Ezra 10 remain highly relevant:
Ezra 10:42, though a simple list of names, stands as a testament to the profound and often painful process of national and personal repentance necessary to restore a right relationship with God.
Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated โ the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.