Acts 24:8

Commanding his accusers to come unto thee: by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him.

Commanding {G2753} his {G846} accusers {G2725} to come {G2064} unto {G1909} thee {G4571}: by examining {G350} of {G3844} whom {G3739} thyself {G846} mayest {G1410} take knowledge {G1921} of {G4012} all {G3956} these things {G5130}, whereof {G3739} we {G2249} accuse {G2723} him {G846}.

By questioning this man yourself, you will be able to learn all about the things of which we are accusing him.”

By examining him yourself, you will be able to learn the truth about all our charges against him.”

from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things whereof we accuse him.

Commentary

Acts 24:8 is part of the orator Tertullus's elaborate accusation against the Apostle Paul before Governor Felix in Caesarea. Having opened with flattery toward Felix, Tertullus now moves to the core of his legal argument, urging the governor to personally investigate the charges.

Context

This verse immediately follows Tertullus's three main charges against Paul: being a "pestilent fellow," a "mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world," and a "ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes," in addition to attempting to "profane the temple" (Acts 24:5-6). In this verse, Tertullus challenges Felix to verify these claims by personally interrogating Paul's accusers who were present. This appeal to examination was a common legal tactic, aiming to lend credibility to the prosecution's case by inviting scrutiny.

Key Themes

  • The Demand for Examination: Tertullus's statement is a direct request for Felix to conduct a thorough investigation, implying that the evidence against Paul is so strong it will withstand any scrutiny. This sets the stage for Paul's powerful defense.
  • Legal Due Process: Despite the underlying malice and political maneuvering, the scene highlights the Roman legal system's emphasis on hearing both sides and examining witnesses, even if the application of justice was often swayed by personal interests or bribes, as was the case with Felix (Acts 24:26).
  • The Nature of Accusation: The verse underlines the adversarial nature of the trial, where the accusers are confident their testimony will substantiate their claims. This confidence, however, will be challenged by Paul's truthful and eloquent defense in the verses that follow (Acts 24:10-21).

Linguistic Insights

  • The term "accusers" comes from the Greek word katēgoros (κατήγορος), which literally means "one who speaks against" or "one who informs against." It emphasizes the role of those who bring charges.
  • "Examining" translates the Greek word anakrinō (ἀνακρίνω), which implies a thorough investigation, interrogation, or cross-examination. It suggests a judicial inquiry into the facts, not just a casual hearing. This term highlights the expectation of a rigorous legal process.

Related Scriptures

This verse is crucial for understanding the legal proceedings against Paul. For the full context of Tertullus's speech, see Acts 24:1-9. Paul's subsequent defense, where he refutes these very accusations, is found in Acts 24:10-21. The events leading to Paul's arrest and transfer to Caesarea are detailed in Acts 21:27 through Acts 23:35. The theme of false accusation against God's servants is prevalent throughout scripture, for example, in the trials of Jesus (Matthew 26:59-60) and the general biblical warnings against bearing false witness (Exodus 20:16).

Practical Application

Acts 24:8 reminds us that truth often needs to be rigorously defended in the face of false accusations. For believers, this verse can offer comfort and instruction:

  • Trust in Truth: Just as Paul relied on the truth to vindicate him, we are called to stand firm in truth, even when facing opposition or injustice.
  • Patience in Persecution: Paul's trial demonstrates that God can use unjust circumstances to further His purposes, providing opportunities to bear witness to the Gospel before powerful individuals.
  • The Need for Fair Judgment: The verse implicitly highlights the importance of fair legal systems and the need for thorough, unbiased examination of claims, a principle that remains vital in society today.
Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated — the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

  • Acts 25:15 (2 votes)

    About whom, when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed [me], desiring [to have] judgment against him.

  • Acts 25:16 (2 votes)

    To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.

  • Acts 25:5 (2 votes)

    Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with [me], and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.

  • Acts 23:35 (2 votes)

    I will hear thee, said he, when thine accusers are also come. And he commanded him to be kept in Herod's judgment hall.

  • Acts 23:30 (2 votes)

    And when it was told me how that the Jews laid wait for the man, I sent straightway to thee, and gave commandment to his accusers also to say before thee what [they had] against him. Farewell.