1 Chronicles 26:10

Also Hosah, of the children of Merari, had sons; Simri the chief, (for [though] he was not the firstborn, yet his father made him the chief;)

Also Hosah {H2621}, of the children {H1121} of Merari {H4847}, had sons {H1121}; Simri {H8113} the chief {H7218},(for though he was not the firstborn {H1060}, yet his father {H1} made {H7760} him the chief {H7218};)

Hosah, from the descendants of M'rari, had sons: Shimri the chief, for although he was not the firstborn, nevertheless his father made him the chief;

Hosah the Merarite also had sons: Shimri the first (although he was not the firstborn, his father had appointed him as the first),

Also Hosah, of the children of Merari, had sons: Shimri the chief (for though he was not the first-born, yet his father made him chief),

Commentary

1 Chronicles 26:10 provides a specific detail about the lineage and appointment of Levite gatekeepers during King David's reign, focusing on Hosah's family from the Merarite clan. It highlights an important principle regarding leadership within ancient Israelite society.

Context of 1 Chronicles 26:10

This verse is part of a larger section in 1 Chronicles chapter 26 that meticulously lists the divisions of the Levites appointed by King David for temple service, specifically focusing on the gatekeepers. These gatekeepers were crucial for maintaining order, security, and access to the sacred spaces of the tabernacle and later the temple. Hosah belonged to the Merarite clan, one of the three main branches of the Levites, who traditionally had responsibilities related to the heavier components of the tabernacle and its upkeep.

Key Themes and Insights

  • Appointment Over Primogeniture: The most striking detail in this verse is that Simri, though "not the firstborn, yet his father made him the chief." This illustrates a pattern seen elsewhere in Scripture where God's choice or a father's discernment, often guided by divine leading, could override the traditional right of the firstborn (primogeniture). This was not an uncommon occurrence in biblical history, emphasizing character and calling over birth order, as seen with figures like Ephraim over Manasseh or David being chosen over his older brothers.
  • Divine Sovereignty in Leadership: While it states "his father made him the chief," such appointments in Israel often reflected a divine leading or recognition of specific gifting. This suggests that leadership roles, especially in sacred service, were not solely determined by human tradition but by a higher purpose, aligning with God's sovereign plan for His people and the temple's operations. This echoes principles found in passages concerning God's choice of individuals based on His purpose, not human merit or birthright.
  • Importance of Gatekeepers: The detailed enumeration of gatekeepers underscores the vital role they played. They were not merely guards but custodians of holiness, ensuring only authorized individuals entered sacred areas and maintaining the sanctity of worship. Their service was integral to the temple's function, as important as the priests and musicians, highlighting that all roles in God's house are significant.

Linguistic Nuance

The Hebrew word for "chief" (רֹאשׁ, ro'sh) signifies head, leader, or principal. Its usage here emphasizes Simri's position of authority and responsibility within his family and among the gatekeepers, a role specifically conferred upon him despite not being the natural inheritor of that position by birth order. This highlights a deliberate act of selection.

Practical Application

The account of Simri serves as a powerful reminder that God's ways are not always man's ways. Leadership and responsibility, especially in God's service, are not always dictated by human conventions like birth order or social status. Instead, they are often based on divine selection, gifting, and suitability for the task. This encourages believers to recognize that God calls and equips individuals according to His purpose, irrespective of traditional expectations. It also highlights the importance of discerning character and capability when appointing leaders, a principle applicable in all areas of life, including the church today, as seen in qualifications for elders and deacons (e.g., 1 Timothy 3:1-7).

Note: If the commentary doesn’t appear instantly, please allow 2–5 seconds for it to load. It is generated by Gemini 2.5 Flash using a prompt focused on Biblical fidelity over bias. While the insights have been consistently reliable, we encourage prayerful discernment through the Holy Spirit.

Please note that only the commentary section is AI-generated β€” the main Scripture and cross-references are stored on the site and are from trusted and verified sources.

Cross-References

  • 1 Chronicles 16:38 (4 votes)

    And Obededom with their brethren, threescore and eight; Obededom also the son of Jeduthun and Hosah [to be] porters:

  • 1 Chronicles 5:1 (2 votes)

    ΒΆ Now the sons of Reuben the firstborn of Israel, (for he [was] the firstborn; but, forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph the son of Israel: and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright.

  • 1 Chronicles 5:2 (2 votes)

    For Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him [came] the chief ruler; but the birthright [was] Joseph's:)